I love how most of these look like they're showing off their stuff while Robert Duncan McNeill and Garrett Wang look like they're off to do something stupid with it. Honestly, that has peak Harry and Tom energy.

And the Doctor is exactly the kind of person who wouldn't shut up about his Blackberry.

Bit unusual what Robert Beltran is doing. That picture has more personality than seven seasons of Chakotay.

You're thinking of dark bears which don't interact with regular bears and are hard to detect.

The companies can stay. Their IP rights, though..

I recently helped evaluate it for company use. My test considered of vibecoding an App that takes a Pipewire screencast and does some basic image processing on each frame. In C#, which doesn't have great options for talking to Pipewire. I did several runs with various iterations of Claude.

On the upside, it had few problems navigating DBus to negotiate a screencast handle. So that's one annoying API out of the way.

On the downside, all attempts at taking to libpipewire through P/Invoke failed, usually because Claude hallucinated parts of the API or set constants to incorrect values. I only got a working program when I allowed the use of a prerelease Pipewire NuGet package.

The generated code was of acceptable quality but I wouldn't allow it into a codebase without a refactor. The code has zero consistency and one time the whole solution didn't have any namespaces. The fact that the LLM writes and rewrites the code during a single prompt means that you can get mild spaghetti as an initial state.

Honestly, I can see it for something like rapid prototyping or implementing basic scaffolding for an annoying API. But damn is Claude bad at detail work.

"Houston, what is 'New Teams Classic' and why is it asking me to log in three times in a row?"

The GL also stands for "genetic lifeform", unlike Chell who is a generic lifeform.

Wait. All the other lifeforms just called and told me they don't want to be compared to Chell. I give my apologies. To them.

You could just... wash them right before serving them. Why would you wash them way before?

My company actually realized that an open-plan office with barely controllable AC isn't very attractive in 2026. Now they're looking for a new office so they can get rid of the current one.

Good riddance. The building has a (painted) metal facade so mobile reception is crap and you can hear the espresso machine from every point in the office with perfect clarity.

I once attended a wedding in the States once and I still distinctly remember the wedding cake. It was the worst cake I ever had.

It was pretty, mind you. But the texture sucked and it tasted like sugar and fat and nothing else. It was embarrassingly bad. For some reason none of the Americans present saw anything wrong with this monstrosity.

A wedding cake celebrates one of the most important moments of two people's lives. It's ridiculously expensive. And Americans either fully accept that it's a barely edible piece of decoration or they actually have no standards regarding baked goods at all.

(The success of Twinkies does suggest a most unhappy conclusion here...)

Sounds easy but we're deep in "draw the rest of the fucking owl" territory here.

For some people the threshold for healthy eating habits is low. I have to actively try to gain weight and I can handle slight hunger well so for me very little would have to change on a diet.

That person I mentioned, on the other hand, has to pre-plan their nutrition for a week down to the macronutrients of each single meal, just like a bodybuilder. A planning mistake will most likely result in binge eating. And yes, they would eat half a loaf of full-grain bread at night if nothing else was there.

So for someone like them advice like "have some self control and don't buy junk food" is about as helpful as "have you tried not being poor". Getting their endocrine system and gut microbiome to accept anything below maintenance calories is a long and nontrivial journey.

Unfortunately people respond differently to hunger.

Someone I know is trying to lose weight. Problem is, if they go ~100 kcal below maintenance they turn into a stress eater. ~200 below and they are unable to stop themselves from eating 400 kcal worth of food straight or of the fridge at night. All that on top of being hangry all day.

So losing weight means balancing the diet very carefully because that's not much space between eating enough to maintain the weight and eating so little that hunger overrides reason and overcompensates.

For other people going below maintenance is just kinda uncomfortable but easily doable for a couple days. Advice like "just eat less" actually works for them without having to make a whole science out of it.

The sentence length is not the problem here. The problem is that the judge has established legal precedent for "upgrading" a crime to terrorism. Secretly at that, without informing the defense or jury.

So now any crime can get you punished under terrorism statutes at the judge's discretion and the judge can announce that after the jury has delivered a verdict. That's not how a justice system should work.

I hope that the defense will move for a mistrial and win. Not that I think the perpetrators should walk free; they certainly seem to be guilty. But they should be convicted under the correct statutes for their crimes.