top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 159 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yep, the state loves to control the two largest metropolitan areas. They also own St. Louis' police. They want full control over the cities because we're the cash cows for the state, despite all the lip service paid to farmers and rural people, who all depend on the money we generate here for their welfare.

It's a remnant of Civil War-era law and unlikely to ever change.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yep we damn well didn't want to give the pigs anymore than they already get. And you aren't wrong about the situation in St Louis. People don't even understand how that shit can be like that. It's completely fucked up in the eyes of most the rest of the world but in Missouri it's just Tuesday.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yup, I hate the KCPD.

    It wasn't that long ago that they were just letting break-ins happen because they wanted to make Jackson County Prosecutor look bad and try to kill her reelection hopes, all for having the temerity to criticize the shitty job that cops do here. I see them when I'm out walking the dogs a lot and they're always friendly to my face, but I keep in the back of my mind that these people are a piece-of-refuse gang and they'd happily shoot me and my animals in the head if it were convenient for them.

    Remember the cardinal rule, friends: Don't talk to cops. Ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 129 points 3 months ago (24 children)

    If two-thirds of a populace is opposed to something, and their government approves it anyway. Then their government is illegitimate.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    The issue here is what to do when you have multiple levels of government. One government entity may be against a policy, but a larger government entity which includes the smaller entity may be for a policy.

    This case is regarding police funding, but this could apply to school or welfare programs as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, and I know this sounds trivial by comparison, but we had something similar here recently and it was a proposed ban on fox hunting that the government scooched away that the populous were wildly in favour of.

    I have to say that if 25% of my city's money was being spent on police I'd be making them earn their fucking money and you may infer from that what you will.

    Imagine the opportunity cost. And guess who lost the most in that trade? The most vulnerable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,

    Core concept, really.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 70 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    25% of a city budget to police? Wtf?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    A lot of towns and cities spend way more than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    I just checked, in Helsinki, Finland (my instance's location), 25% of the city budget (~1,25B€) would cover the police expense for entire country and more (~900M€).

    Here police is managed by the state but I tried to make things comparable. And I don't believe the police is extremely underfunded there. Is the US police driving tanks or wtf?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Urban police have a fuck ton of high tech equipment, high pay, and unlimited overtime (because the cities politically can't stop them from taking it). They also have frequent legal costs because they keep violating citizens' rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Alright, well I guess this transit expansion is going under the police file. I hope you like driving buses, cops.

    But more seriously...

    Adding insult to injury for Kansas City, local officials will have no say in how their money gets spent by the police department—even as they are required by the state to pour more funds into it.

    Talk about a corruption machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Republicans are for "small government" unless they control the state and it is a local gov.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I wonder if you couldn't start hiring social workers and garbage collectors under the police's budget. Pitch it in some ridiculous but slightly connected way. Garbage collectors could be 'gathering evidence' as the law allows garbage to be searched without warrant, and social workers could be some sort of 'post-incident contact follow-up-ers.' Hell, expand it to wildly mildly connected things, like roadwork and bike paths, you know, to make the cops able to get around faster.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Social workers, Crisis intervention teams, psychologists and a whole lot more. Police work doesn't necessarily just consist of shooting people. But I guess in the US that's a radical viewpoint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    The problem is the KCPD doesn’t report to the city. They don’t have to do what the mayor says so they just do what they want.

    It’s gross and they end up paying out a lot in lawsuits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    Oh they privatized trash pickup. It sucks. Cost more and you never know when they will get there. It has improved marginally in recent years. But even just a year or two ago. They would regularly not show up till the day after pick up was supposed to be. Often well after sunset. I'm guessing they were probably purposely understaffing. Abusing their employees to nickel and dime the contract for every cent they could get.

    And if there's one thing our dip shit state legislature is against. It's having competition for privatized services. Especially after the Kickbacks they get.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Well see the police budget is now 99 percent this new peoples internal affairs that get anti tank weapons and are hired to follow cops around there are ten with gins pointed at cops at all times under the logic that policibg makes you good so were just policing the police so they're more efficient and good

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Fuckin' statewide vote for an issue that only affects one city...

    And it's not 25% of the city's budget. It was a 25% increase in the police budget, bringing it to 38% of the city's budget. Just enough that KC had to scrap plans for free bus fares.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 3 months ago

    I'm starting to think that our democracy is broken.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Why can't the city just put all sorts of social services under the police department. Heck do the whole city and everyone gets better pay and benefits.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    i mean i heard before USA has a flawed Democracy.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    I wonder how much of that 25% is being spent to pay for lawsuits it settled or lost? I'm sure that's not just an LA thing.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    "Small government" red states love doing stuff like this. The state of Indiana passed a law banning 'no turn on red' signs, just to spite Indianapolis.

    These states are run by rural losers who resent the fact that they depend on the predominantly blue cities for all their economic activity.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    Yes, we are in the rare situation of not being in control of our police department. They do not report to the mayor and he has very little say in how they behave.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Gotta pump up those urban crime stats.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Hey this happens in Canada too. In BC, the capital city has 23% of budget go to VicPD. The city has tried turning down budget increase requests, then the province stepped in and forced them to do it.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›