302
Why is the Democratic party still hiding its 2024 election autopsy?
(www.theguardian.com)
Probably because the solution would be easy, but would lose them AIPAC bribes.
"We successfully failed to win. The AIPAC money must keep coming in."
It rhymes and they're slime.
..bb-bUt look at everything but Democrats did win. Donor money, trips to Israel, lobbying dinners, suspiciously-accurate stock market moves... You need to re-shape your mindset and focus on the incremental gains!
TLDR: Because they don't give a fuck about you or me or anyone who isn't a donor.
Repubs want to hurt you. Dems don't care that you exist. We need a third party (as if that's a new idea).
Stop fucking talking about 3rd party, that's throwing your vote away.
Besides, the tea party proved you don't need another party, simply primary and take over one of the main ones.
Progressives have already started, we need to keep the energy going.
More Mandani's less Schumers and we'll get what we want.
More Mandani’s
Ok, this person is a fucking troll trying to sew division on the Left. Zorhan Mamdani proved that young people want progressive politics. This person doesn't know how to spell his name and they're claiming he's the reason we need to keep supporting Dems and "take over" the party when it's clearly already captured by the corporate class.
I think this person might be a right-wing plant trying to sabotage Leftist solidarity. They (the right) play dirty. Watch out. Don't become divided (said the person calling someone a plant; the irony is not lost on me).
Footnote: a person who genuinely cares about politics enough to want to take over the Dems with progressives would know (or at least look up) how to spell the name of the person they were using in their argument. A person who only wants to sew division might be stupid and not know they should double-check the spelling.
One SOWs division. One SEWs clothing.
Speaking of spelling....
You know what makes me lose hope? It's not Republicans pushing fascism and corruption. It's not the Democrats being spineless and ineffective as a wet rag.
It's comments like this, showing that the people who should be upset and fighting against this mess are filled with the dumbest motherfuckers alive.
"Someone say something I don't agree with? Must be right wing troll!!!1!!"
Like damn man. Can you just fucking not? It's fucking embarrassing to be sharing the same space as people with takes this idiotic.
Uh, while he may be a fucking troll, it doesn't mean he isn't right. He's trying to divide the left by telling us to not... checks notes... divide? Primarying non-progressive dems is the best bet if you don't want to have a republican majority for the interim time period between starting a third party and the dems giving up and going home.
Your post perfectly describes you, more than him.
Quick: who's got Mayor Mamdani on their team? THOSE guys seem to care about people.
The guys who refused to endorse him.
Quick: who’s got Mayor Mamdani on their team? THOSE guys seem to car about people.
The political equivalent of having a black friend just dropped.
Don't let them divide us. I just (five minutes ago) responded to what I think is a pretty clear plant (see misspelling of Mamdami's name). Whether someone isn't "Left-enough" to you or whatever, if they want to help people and want to beat the Repubs, try to bring them along.
There's the trope that Leftists fight each other and the right have solidarity. The first part is true. The second part is only true in that they unite around hate and fear and bigotry. That's why the orange dickbag kept firing his cabinet in the first admin. And though he brought a bunch of sycophantic ass-kissers this time, he's finally removing them too.
Let's work together to put these assholes in prison.
load more comments
(5 replies)
The Democratic Party isn’t there to “win”, it’s there to act as a honeypot to attract and neutralize progressives, and to make sure that the “Overton Window” of American politics never moves left.
Controlled Opposition achieved by lobbying and corprate capture
Many Americans are aware of the Ratchet Effect but they’re reluctant to acknowledge that it’s deliberate and coordinated, instead asserting that it’s a function of the “donor class” in the Democratic Party having a different perspective on how political priorities should be assigned.
It's irrelevant if it's coordinated or not. Alignment of interests gives the same results as overt conspiracy.
So far the only reason that they would want to keep this a secret is AIPAC.
Just reading the headline reminded me of how disgusting the amount of money in US politics is. It's probably spreading to other places too.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Because they don't intend to change anything and they don't want to get called out on repeating the same exact mistakes.
Why? Because their candidates were a couple of corporate stooges who licked Israel's butthole.
Neither one showed any humanity or concern for the working class.
Meanwhile trump convinced the common man he was on their side and would lower prices. It was all a lie of course. But the democrats couldn't even be bothered to do that.
The whole campaign was "we aren't trump". But offered not solutions at all, just tired platitudes and insincere posturing from a women who had all the empathy of a cold ham.
The DNC needs to stop seeing people as demographics. They were so over the moon to have a black asian female candidate that they overlooked the fact no one actually wants a career prosecutor with political ambitions who stands for nothing. She waved her little $4000 tax credit in the wind for about five minutes and lost. What autopsy do we even need to see?
load more comments
(14 replies)
We all know the reason. It condemns their own shit neoliberal policies and posturing, and they want to continue to pretend that their problem is how they sell the snake oil rather the fact that nobody wants fucking snake oil.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
302 points (98.4% liked)
politics
29793 readers
1856 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS