430
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 208 points 2 days ago

I’ve watched the video and work at Atlassian, that’s entirely not what the video is. The guy basically just goes over what he worked on and some things he learned. It’s basically a solid video resumé with a clickbait title. Nothing he says is new or scandalous - most of it’s open source.

[-] robbo@programming.dev 34 points 2 days ago

Atlassin is such a weird company to me. Used bitbucket a decade ago and everything just kept changing, things bought, what I used didn't feel like it got better. Is it a good place to work?

[-] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

The company claims good values and I would say mostly lives up to them, especially transparency. Though overall it is slowly becoming more corporate as it grows and especially leans in to AI hype.

The people and compensation and benefits are great, you get a lot of resources (can just spin up a fully hosted app via a terminal command if you want).

I am also lucky to be part of a small, internal-facing, chill, and yet important team so my experience on day-to-day work would definitely differ from a random Jira dev though.

I’ve not yet met anybody who has disliked working at the company — everybody dislikes the ‘APEX’ system used for measuring performance though lmao.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 9 points 2 days ago

Didn’t the name come from one of the founders being a huge Ayn Rand stan? That sounds like a red flag.

[-] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As someone who is using the Atlassian stack daily, Bitbucket (self hosted) is by far the best product from the stack. Jira is okay if you actually plan on using its features extensively. Confluence is... Well, it tries. I'd even prefer plain Mediawiki over it.

[-] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

That’s funny, before I joined Atlassian my previous company also used their stack and Confluence was the only product I could stomach. All the products have rapidly evolved over the last few years though.

[-] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jira is extremely configuration dependent. It can be good and it can be awful. Companies with bad processes will configure it in the same way and I believe that's where most of the hate comes from. Bitbucket is pretty decent by now. It's just not very feature rich. But that's not really a problem for this type of software if you hand over to other tools with the extensive web hooks. But confluence... It feels like it has been stuck in time while Mediawiki is continually closing the gap. Especially automatically updating pages is a pain with the weird and fragile code that represents the pages internally.

[-] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

I used to hate Jira. Until I had to use Clickup. I don't mind Jira anymore.

[-] robbo@programming.dev 1 points 27 minutes ago

I loved early days clickup. Then they stacked feature on top of feature on top of feature. Left to try manage things in more simple tools like trello and even tried youtrack (was so fucking slow we left). Then Linear came around and it has been good but gradually feels like it's going the way of clickup.

[-] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

This is spot on, I've used four Jira system that if I didn't know they were all Jira, I would have though they were different products with similar "generic enterprise" styling. That being said, I've rather strongly disliked every instance of Jira I've used. It probably stems from the fact that I have maintained and built over a dozen ticketing systems over the years and some of the annoyances and rough edges just feel like solved problems to me.

[-] Redjard@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

There's better wikis than mediawiki?

[-] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

It's really good but not the first choice for casual users.

[-] glowie@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

I would fire myself if I had to work there

[-] JohnnyMac@lemmy.world 151 points 2 days ago

If anyone starting fresh and decided to copy atlassian, they're doing it wrong

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

No shit right?

I'd pay you to shit my hand in a drawer if it meant I didn't have to use atlassian

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

I'd pay you to shit my hand in a drawer if it meant I didn't have to use atlassian

How would you get your hand into the drawer, and why wouldn’t we just do it over a toilet like civilized people?

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago
[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[-] djdarren@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Maicyn? Pronounced "Mason", I assume?

[-] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 3 points 2 days ago

Exploiting your kids for views. Though it was funny if I ignore that.

[-] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

No I think he has to fist you first, so you can then shit his hand into the drawer.

[-] coredev@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

I don't think so at all. Jira today is quite good. If you want something really shitty try Azure DevOps.

[-] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I just want it to be less buggy. When it works, it's alright but often I'd need to refresh the page for tasks to actually load rather than just showing a white panel.

Also if Bitbucket wouldn't stop going down every month, that'd be great.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

isn't it just k8s home-made?

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Huh? One is a productivity, planning, and documentation platform, the other is a container orchestration platform. Neither are homemade.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

i meant this guy's infrastructure provision system

it's like a bespoke terraform

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 42 points 2 days ago

showing how the company's entire tech works

Simple, it doesn't.

[-] Endmaker@ani.social 56 points 2 days ago

free for anyone to copy

I don't think their system architecture is a secret. This kind of stuff is regularly discussed in interviews.

[-] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

I think that is the rub though. If your interview pipeline has system design questions all based around your arch that someone just released a youtube vid dissecting, you're going to struggle to get signal out those interviews. False positive hires are arguably worse than false negatives.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

Aw shit we use JIRA at work. Will it get worse now?

[-] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago
[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago

Oh you sweet summer child. Have you seen Rational Team Concert?

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago

Rational Team Concert

Is that a boy punk group?

[-] tinyvoltron@discuss.online 9 points 2 days ago

You're the other person that used RTC?! I had heard there was another but I was starting to think it was just a legend.

I migrated an entire codebase from a combo of RCS, CVS, and Subversion. This was about 10 minutes before git started to hit in a big way.

I'd call it a dumpster fire but that really disrespects dumpster fires.

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

You mean it was worse than Microsoft Source Safe? The VCS that used to lose data?

[-] tinyvoltron@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago

Source Safe just attempted to be a useless source control system. RTC tried to add issue tracking, automation, and other crap. It wanted to be truly terrible at everything.

But Source Safe was fantastically bad. I especially liked that its database file was limited to like 2GB. It was so bad that Microslop didn't use it.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's the best I've ever used, so take that for what you will Action Remedy System was...something.

Although ive found that Jira and Confluence Cloud madr dozens and dozens of bad decisions and regressions over the oon-prem version.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

we (team of 15) use salesforce and a promise to include issue numbers in our (svn) commit msgs all on one dev branch so when we cherry pick merge later to qa we can “safely” assume we got it all. 30% of the time it works 10% of the time.

i can’t convince these guys code is not “self documenting” let alone use git or a tool for proper bug reporting.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I had a boss who wrote a script to automatically remove all comments from code for pull requests. Since nobody ever added meaningful comments to their commits (or made any contributions at all to the alleged documentation), the code base was a complete mystery to the people who were actually working on it. God knows what it seemed like to new developers added to the project. But hey, comments are a "code smell" (his exact words) so it was all good.

His primary justification of his "comments bad" philosophy was that if comments aren't kept up-to-date with the code, they can mislead and confuse future developers. This gets said a lot but it is something that I have literally never seen in 25 years of programming (I've witnessed -- and participated in -- a large number of project failures, and misleading comments have never been the cause of the failure). I pointed out that the same exact thing could be said about method and variable names but nobody ever advocates not using descriptive method and variable names; he had no response to this.

[-] nbsp@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

kinda depends how you set it up and run it, no?

i have some simple new projects that are clean and easy, and some 10+ year old monstrosities that are the spawn of satan.

need to use ublock to stop the insane 'pls bro buy our ai' pop-up though.

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I inject an entire set of CSS rules into Jira and into Confluence 🫠

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I use Atlassian products every day.

I'm good. 😒

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

The world needs to see how it works to learn from our past errors and move forward as a society

[-] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For those tired of being nickel & dimed, you can hop the wall here.

[-] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago

haven't watched the video yet, but the medium article sounds very much like llm slop

[-] robbo@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

considering the human summaries here the slop isn't even close to correct, it based it all off the title

[-] Venat0r@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I hope someone at azure sees it 😅

I don't know if this is really effective revenge. An understanding of the software isn't why businesses outsource to a company like Atlassian. Its convenience. If Atlassian's product is good enough why build your own?

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

It’s not revenge. It’s a CV

Ha! I like it!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
430 points (95.7% liked)

Programming

26970 readers
275 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS