6
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/usa@midwest.social
63
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/world@quokk.au
9
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/technology@lemmy.zip
79
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/DeFlock@sh.itjust.works

Full story

After residents of a Virginia town complained about AI-powered license plate reading cameras in their community, the head of the company that provided them to the local police department pushed back. His message was defiant.

“Let’s call this what it is: Flock, and the law enforcement agencies we partner with, are under coordinated attack,” Garrett Langley, chief executive of Flock Safety, wrote in an unsolicited email to Staunton Police Chief Jim Williams. “The attacks aren’t new. You’ve been dealing with this forever, and we’ve been dealing with this since our founding, from the same activist groups who want to defund the police, weaken public safety, and normalize lawlessness.”

Langley’s defiance backfired.

Last month, Staunton joined the growing list of cities that are canceling contracts with Flock, amid a growing public backlash over the surveillance technology’s expansion.

City council meetings from Washington state to Massachusetts have been filled with concerned residents, many of whom accuse their local officials of entering into contracts that allow unwarranted spying without their input or knowledge.

Williams, the longtime chief in Staunton, a town of about 25,000 in the Shenandoah Valley where Flock installed six license plate reading cameras in 2024, rejected Langley’s assertion that law enforcement is under attack.

“What we are seeing here is a group of local citizens who are raising concerns that we could be potentially surveilling private citizens, residents and visitors and using the data for nefarious purposes,” Williams wrote to Langley. “These citizens have been exercising their rights to receive answers from me, my staff, and city officials, to include our elected leaders.

“In short,” he said, “it is democracy in action.” Video spurs scrutiny

More than 80,000 Flock cameras are said to be in use throughout the U.S. Flock’s customers include an estimated 5,000 law enforcement agencies and 1,000 corporations.

Scrutiny of the company has intensified since a YouTube video revealed how live feeds from more than 60 cameras were exposed to the open internet.

The video has been viewed more than 953,000 times. Its producer, technologist Benn Jordan, told Straight Arrow News that he sent an email thanking Williams for what he saw as a rational response to Flock’s CEO.

Jordan also expressed concern over Langley’s email, which he believes may have been sent out en masse.

“I realized that Garrett Langley’s original email was unsolicited and impersonal, coming from a ‘no_reply’ address, which suggests that this kind of message is going out to large amounts of law enforcement agencies around the country,” Jordan said. “Intentionally misleading law enforcement and trying to get them to ‘join the fight’ against people critical of your company is incredibly reckless and dangerous.”

“I’ve already had police show up to my house after taking video footage of Flock Safety cameras,” Jordan continued. “How will they approach my house if they have reason to believe that I’m part of a ‘lawless coordinated attack’ on them?”

SAN reached out to Flock with specific questions about Langley’s email and the contract cancellation in Staunton. The company replied only with a link to a page on its website outlining its privacy and ethics guidelines. A clash of values

In Staunton, Williams said the Flock cameras had helped officers locate missing and wanted persons, recover stolen vehicles and identify suspects in crimes.

However, the damage from Langley’s email could not be undone. After Williams met with the city manager and city council to discuss Langley’s remarks, they decided to end the contract with Flock.

In a statement, the city said that Langley’s “narrative does not reflect” Staunton’s values.

“The Staunton Police Department reported numerous successes utilizing this technology,” the statement said. “Unfortunately, the city does not agree with the assessment as detailed by the CEO of Flock Safety.”

The city says it is currently coordinating with Flock to finalize the contract’s termination and to turn off and remove all license plate reading cameras.

‘A new era’

The situation in Staunton is similar to a growing number of others, including in Flagstaff, Arizona, which terminated its contract with Flock in December after a month of pushback from local residents. Despite efforts by police to ease concerns by outlining policy guardrails, the Flagstaff City Council ultimately voted unanimously to end the partnership.

Jan Carlile, a local resident who supported terminating the contract, said during public comment that the potential privacy ramifications were too much to bear.

“I admire and respect the efforts of our police department to try to do the very best they can to protect our safety, and until the advancement of AI and frankly the troubling efforts by our current national administration, both of those can potentially very seriously undercut our privacy as citizens,” Carlile said. “I would not likely have been concerned about the use of cameras as a tool for public safety [in the past], but we are in a new era.”

Cambridge, Massachusetts, initially paused the use of 16 cameras in October. But city officials canceled their contract entirely after it was revealed that Flock had installed two additional cameras without the city’s knowledge.

“Concerns about Flock were substantiated,” said city spokesperson Jeremy Warnick. “Due to this material breach of our trust and the agreement, the city terminated its contract with Flock Safety.”

In Evanston, Illinois, a similar series of events unfolded. After the city terminated its contract in late August and deactivated 19 cameras, Flock began reinstalling cameras across the city, seemingly unbeknownst to local officials and residents. The city responded in September by issuing a cease-and-desist order against Flock, which said that it would uninstall the cameras.

The controversy came around the same time that an audit by the Illinois Secretary of State found that Flock had violated state law by allowing U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to data collected by its license plate-reading cameras. Flock refuted the charge.

Washington state has also been a hotbed for backlash against Flock. The cities of Redmond and Lynwood deactivated their cameras in November while reevaluating their contracts after complaints from residents. The City Council in Mountlake Terrace unanimously canceled its contract in November, while the capital city of Olympia uninstalled 15 cameras and canceled its pilot program with Flock in December.

18
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/world@quokk.au

[A video podcast about Cuba, hosted on PeerTube.wtf, from the podcast team Cuba Analysis Podcasts]

Historian and Executive Director of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research, Vijay Prashad, joins Cuba Analysis to examine Cuba’s revolutionary endurance, the legacy of the Tricontinental movement, and the ongoing global struggle against imperialism. With the 60th anniversary of the Tricontinental Conference taking place in January 2026 at the University of Havana (12–14 January), Prashad calls for renewed debate on South–South solidarity and internationalism.

Prashad reflects on his first visit to Cuba during the Special Period of the 1990s, when the collapse of the Soviet Union plunged the island into severe economic crisis. He argues that Cuba’s survival under extreme pressure revealed a central political truth: socialism, when confronted by empire, becomes an essential defence of sovereignty, dignity, and collective survival.

We discuss the historic 1966 Tricontinental Conference in Havana, which united revolutionary movements from Asia, Africa, and Latin America and laid the foundations for anti-imperialist internationalism. Prashad explains how the conference fused the Bandung Movement’s demand for sovereignty with Marxism’s commitment to human dignity, forging a tradition of national liberation socialism that continues to shape struggles across the Global South.

Prashad delivers a sharp analysis of ongoing U.S. aggression against Cuba, identifying the blockade as the central human rights violation—an illegal and permanent siege aimed at undermining the Cuban Revolution. He situates today’s economic crisis within a “permanent Special Period” driven by sanctions, financial warfare, and political isolation, and calls for stronger international solidarity, particularly from Latin America and the BRICS countries. He stresses that defending Venezuela is inseparable from defending Cuba.

The conversation also explores the continued relevance of Marxist analysis, critiques moralistic and idealist tendencies on the left, and highlights the importance of understanding history’s contradictions and reversals in the long struggle for social transformation.

This episode offers a rigorous political and historical analysis of Cuba’s revolutionary project and its international significance, through the lens of one of the most influential critical thinkers of our time.

4
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Semi-impartial article, although it is easy to see what side Politico, or at least the journalist - prefers to lean in relation to the agreement.

POLITICO analyzes who is uncorking the Malbec — and who is crying into their Bordeaux (cough, Emmanuel Macron, cough).

Europe’s biggest ever trade deal finally got the nod Friday after 25 years of negotiating.

It took blood, sweat, tears and tortured discussions to get there, but EU countries at last backed the deal with the Mercosur bloc — paving the way to create a free trade area that covers more than 700 million people across Europe and Latin America.

The agreement, which awaits approval from the European Parliament, will eliminate more than 90 percent of tariffs on EU exports. European shoppers will be able to dine on grass-fed beef from the Argentinian pampas. Brazilian drivers will see import duties on German motors come down.

As for the accord’s economic impact, well, that pales in comparison with the epic battles over it: The European Commission estimates it will add €77.6 billion (or 0.05 percent) to the EU economy by 2040.

Like in any deal, there are winners and losers. POLITICO takes you through who is uncorking their Malbec, and who, on the other hand, is crying into the Bordeaux.

WINNERS

Giorgia Meloni

Italy’s prime minister has done it again. Giorgia Meloni saw which way the political winds were blowing and skillfully extracted last-minute concessions for Italian farmers after threatening to throw her weight behind French opposition to the deal.

The end result? In exchange for its support, Rome was able to secure farm market safeguards and promises of fresh agriculture funding from the European Commission — wins that the government can trumpet in front of voters back home. It also means that Meloni has picked the winning side once more, coming off as the team player despite the last-minute holdup. All in all, yet another laurel in Rome’s crown.

The German car industry

Das Auto hasn’t had much reason to cheer of late, but Mercosur finally gives reason to celebrate. Germany’s famed automotive sector will have easier access to consumers in LatAm. Lower tariffs mean, all things being equal, more sales and a boost to the bottom line for companies like Volkswagen and BMW.

There are a few catches. Tariffs, now at 35 percent, aren’t coming down all at once. At the behest of Brazil, which hosts an auto industry of its own, the removal of trade barriers will be staggered. Electric vehicles will be given preferential treatment, an area that Europe’s been lagging behind on.

Ursula von der Leyen

Mercosur is a bittersweet triumph for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Since shaking hands on the deal with Mercosur leaders more than a year ago, her team has bent over backwards to accommodate the demands of the skeptics and build the all-important qualified majority that finally materialized Friday. Expect a victory lap next week, when the Berlaymont boss travels to Paraguay to sign the agreement.

On the international stage, it also helps burnish Brussels’ standing at a time when the bloc looks like a lumbering dinosaur, consistently outmaneuvered by the U.S. and China. A large-scale trade deal shows that the rules-based international order that the EU so cherishes is still alive, even as the U.S. whisked away a South American leader in chains.

But the deal came at a very high cost. Von der Leyen had to promise EU farmers €45 billion in subsidies to win them over, backtracking on efforts to rein in agricultural support in the EU budget and invest more in innovation and growth.

Europe’s farmers

Speaking of farmers, going by the headlines you could be forgiven for thinking that Mercosur is an unmitigated disaster. Surely innumerable tons of South American produce sold at rock-bottom prices are about to drive the hard-working French or Polish plowman off his land, right?

The reality is a little bit more complicated. The deal comes with strict quotas for categories ranging from beef to poultry. In effect, Latin American farmers will be limited to exporting a couple of chicken breasts per European person per year. Meanwhile, the deal recognizes special protections for European producers for specialty products like Italian parmesan or French wine, who stand to benefit from the expanded market. So much for the agri-pocalpyse now.

Then there’s the matter of the €45 billion of subsidies going into farmers’ pockets, and it’s hard not to conclude that — despite all the tractor protests and manure fights in downtown Brussels — the deal doesn’t smell too bad after all.

LOSERS

Emmanuel Macron

There’s been no one high-ranking politician more steadfast in their opposition to the trade agreement than France’s President Emmanuel Macron who, under enormous domestic political pressure, has consistently opposed the deal. It’s no surprise then that France joined Poland, Austria, Ireland and Hungary to unsuccessfully vote against Mercosur.

The former investment banker might be a free-trading capitalist at heart, but he knows well that, domestically, the deal is seen as a knife in the back of long-suffering Gallic growers. Macron, who is burning through prime ministers at rates previously reserved for political basket cases like Italy, has had precious few wins recently. Torpedoing the free trade agreement, or at least delaying it further, would have been proof that the lame-duck French president still had some sway on the European stage. Macron made a valiant attempt to rally the troops for a last-minute counterattack, and at one point it looked like he had a good chance to throw a wrench in the works after wooing Italy’s Meloni. That’s all come to nought. After this latest defeat, expect more lambasting of the French president in the national media, as Macron continues his slow-motion tumble down from the Olympian heights of the Élysée Palace.

Donald Trump

Coming within days of the U.S. mission to snatch Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro and put him on trial in New York, the Mercosur deal finally shows that Europe has no shortage of soft power to work constructively with like-minded partners — if it actually has the wit to make use of it smartly.

Any trade deal should be seen as a win-win proposition for both sides, and that is just not the way U.S. President Donald Trump and his art of the geopolitical shakedown works.

It also has the incidental benefit of strengthening his adversaries — including Brazilian President and Mercosur head honcho Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva — who showed extraordinary patience as he waited on the EU to get their act together (and nurtured a public bromance with Macron even as the trade talks were deadlocked).

China

China has been expanding exports to Latin America, particularly Brazil, during the decades when the EU was negotiating the Mercosur trade deal. The EU-Mercosur deal is an opportunity for Europe to claw back some market share, especially in competitive sectors like automotive, machines and aviation.

The deal also strengthens the EU’s hand on staying on top when it comes to direct investments, an area where European companies are still outshining their Chinese competitors. More politically, China has somewhat succeeded in drawing countries like Brazil away from Western points of view, for instance via the BRICS grouping, consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, and other developing economies. Because the deal is not only about trade but also creates deeper political cooperation, Lula and his Mercosur counterparts become more closely linked to Europe.

The Amazon rainforest

Unfortunately, for the world’s ecosystem, Mercosur means one thing: burn, baby, burn.

The pastures that feed Brazil’s herds come at the expense of the nation’s once-sprawling, now-shrinking tropical rainforest. Put simply, more beef for Europe means less trees for the world. It’s not all bad news for the climate. The trade deal does include both mandatory safeguards against illegal deforestation, as well as a commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement for its signatories. ___

22
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/technology@lemmy.zip
19
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/ethology@mander.xyz
11
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/science@mander.xyz
3
zube tube acquired (youtube.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/music@lemmy.sdf.org
1
18
submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/world@quokk.au
[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 10 points 3 weeks ago

WHO THE FUCK TOLD YOU‽ Fucking damnit, it was fucking Larry wasn't it‽

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 13 points 3 weeks ago

https://lemmy.world/post/29072279 relevant thread

But yea, a lot of tankies love to hate the fact that we're not immediately resorting to violence to install some authoritarian flavor of communism or something or another and scream about bLuEmAGa all the time

Can the ballot box fail? Sure. Is it guaranteed to be ineffective? No. Are corporate Democrats good? Fuck no. But violence isnt ruled out, it's just the last resort

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 23 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know what you're talking about it was absolutely spelled correctly this whole time and you don't need to check to see if the post was updated or not it's totally unnecessary :)

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 7 points 1 month ago

I've done it lol, but there are a few serial downvoters/downvote trolls out there

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 4 points 1 month ago

I'm ..... intrigued

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 8 points 1 month ago

I think the hate needs to be properly directed towards the companies pushing it and not the tech itself. Because that's pretty much here to stay.

And it does have good utility, in tailored ways wielded by people who know what they're doing (e.g. you should be an experienced programmer already so you can catch when it's fucking up or just doing things on a weird way)

Companies that use it over creatives (e.g. using it for ads or animation for a commercial product) can also fuck off and die

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 10 points 1 month ago

AI technology yea, lots of us find utility and value in AI itself. It's a decent tool, it's not an end all be all like the AI tech bros scream about.

AI companies fuck no, fuck them especially fuck OpenAI

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 8 points 1 month ago

It's more of a hybrid between forums and social media, but they're of type "link aggregator" or in other words, the whole point is to post articles and then have discussions about them.

When Reddit was just getting started all you could do was post links to articles, no pictures and people loved it for that. Pictures came later, but even then depended on those pics just being another link hosted somewhere else (that's where imgur came in) it was years before you could upload a picture direct to reddit

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 11 points 1 month ago

It's officially a link aggregator type of social media with discussions, when Reddit first started you couldn't even display pictures, it was just links of articles. Pictures and thumbnails came later, but even then it was years before you could upload pictures directly to reddit and relied on the picture just being another link usually with imgur

[-] cm0002@toast.ooo 27 points 1 month ago

Great, thanks to you I'm now 50k in RAM debt.

I hope your happy

view more: next ›

cm0002

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 months ago