One of the issues with this is that the previous generation that knows this best in my country is currently the least interested in talking about climate change. My parents grew up in a noticably different climate but they don't want to hear or say anything about this because to them confronting climate change means giving up convenience and if there's one thing boomers hate it's giving up convenience.
I'm only 40 years old and I remember how different it was. If you went on a weekend trip your car would be splattered with insects all over. Our garden used to be full of butterflies and other insects. I've been stung so many times but for my kids it's a really rare occasion.
Not to mention the weeks of snow instead of the scattered few days we have now. And hardly anybody seems to care.
I'm around the same age and notice the same things. I miss the fireflies and butterflies so much. Even the unloved bugs are gone. In summer the car always was plastered with dead bugs, and now that doesn't happen. A lot of notice things are gone, but even more unnoticed things are.
I feel that even though the collective "we" caused this, we as individuals have very little say on a lot of this. I can't get Coke to stop using plastic, I can't get Nestle to stop stealing groundwater, etc, and with decades of elected leaders letting us down, it's hard to come up with a plan of action. Individual actions like adding native plants back into your yard (that's what the company that shared this graphic does, which was why I was ok with sharing a business post), providing artificial animal nests and shelters, and just minding your own consumerism feels like a drop in the ocean, but I believe thousands or millions of us doing those tiny things is sadly going to be more effective in the near term than waiting for people in power to do the right thing. But it's often times hard to convince regular people of that.
It is dejecting to realize what a small drop we are. However, I feel like all I can do is make my contribution and push aside thinking about whether I matter.
My yard was mostly invasive species when I moved into my place, and now I’ve gotten it to about 75% native species and the other 25% are not strictly native to me but I kept them because they appeared to be “bee’s choice” (rhododendrons for example). On any day in the summer I can find butterflies and bees in my yard, and I often sprinkle the seeds into the local park in the hope that the peripheries might grow wild with asters and goldenrod instead of buckthorn and dog strangling vine. Actually, I’d say the guerilla gardening has been a lot of fun - I’ve got some native black cherries in the local park that are establishing nicely and some native roses as well!
You’re right- I needed the squeegee every time I got gas to clean the bugs off my windshield. Now I think I use it once per year
if there's one thing boomers hate it's giving up convenience
And admitting they were wrong!
I saw a post recently about how butterflies are always drawn like that, wings spread all the way out. That's only for dead/preserved specimens, in nature their wings are much more overlapped and I can't stop thinking about it
Most animals are drawn in a way that the viewer can identify them.
It's not a realistic image.
See stick figures. Most people just never go beyond that in their drawing skills.
As long as a picture conveys its intended message, I call it a success!
Interesting observation. Often one of the best times to spot and identify butterflies is really in the morning before they've warmed up and are basking in the sun with their wings wide open. I don't think it's unreasonable for people to draw butterflies as they're most easily seen.
It has to do when they are for collectors they pull the wings up over the head, where naturally the wings dont usually extend above the head
Ahh! Gotcha. That context makes more sense, thanks
Yeah I didn't explain that very well

VS

Having spent so much time looking at owls now, probably 90% of owl drawings I see have the feet drawn in really silly ways. They're not always impossible ways for them to have their toes, but how they actually need to use them to hunt or to distribute their body weight is just not often depicted correctly. I think it's because most depictions fail to capture the correct ratio of foot:body and it doesn't look right (because it isn't), so they stick the outer toes in places they don't belong to fill that space.
The butterfly is probably the same way. We've seen that incorrect image displayed so much that the falsehood has replaced the truth for many of us. Even after we're shown it's incorrect, we often can have trouble reconciling it with years of having it ingrained the other way.
I grew up in the 70s and 80s in the US. It is so much better now.
- Deer were almost extinct in big parts the Midwest
- Raptors were extremely rare
- There weren’t Apex predators like mountain lions, cougars, or bobcats like there are now
- There are so many more birds than when I was a kid
All this nihilism makes everybody feel hopeless. Meanwhile, people have been working towards improving the environment and there have been real payoffs.
Not that we’re done, but the efforts we’ve made have had real tangible changes for the positive.
The impact that Ducks Unlimited made just can’t be overstated.
There have been and will be tremendous wins, and this isn't intended as doomerism, so I hope that is clear. Almost everything I share is intended to inspire people that they can make a difference.
While many of us are doing our part to save things and help others recover, there are still tons of pressure to open preserve to mining or drilling or timber, efforts to roll back protections of waterways, and multiple other efforts to turn nature into cash and resources.
I just saw this post and it reminded me of all the times we discuss the Overton Window in politics, and this felt similar to how people can see our ecosystems. I really only expect this to get like 30 upvotes, but people have really taken an interest to it.
I kinda get the point, but why stop in the 1800's
360 million years ago:

Things were much better back in my day. Everything went to hell around the Triassic. You kids wouldn't know, with your phones and your tablets and opposable thumbs.
EDIT: That was a good read btw
I feel as guilty as the next human for things out of my hands, but even I won't take blame for what happened before an apocalyptic meteor strike! 😜
Neat article though! I love the Devonian.
You see numbers like population reduced by 90% in the last x years. What's often forgotten that it was already reduced by 90% earlier, so actually only 1% is left. As illustrated here.
One of the reasons is the trend of a boring, uniform yard. I remember growing up we had honey suckles, various plants and such in the yard, some were not pleasant to step on but had bio diversity. With the drive of a "perfect" lawn and the use of so many chemicals including pesticides and removal of native flora as well as trees, this has decreased bio-diversity. I hate lawns, I'd rather have natural grasses and shrubs and such.
Then people tell me "well you have to tend to those and it's a lot of work." No you don't, you tend to them because you're keeping up with the neighbors. Let them grow, water them when conditions require, clean up leaves in autumn. There's no need to modify plants for aesthetics, that's not what I'm interested in.
Or, leave the leaves, and have beautiful lightning bugs in the summer
Are leaves good to leave for the health of the ecology? If so, for certain!

Insects and other invertabrates use them as a snow/wind barrier to keep themselves an/or their eggs and larvae safe through the winter. It should be a near endless resource for them, but if we remove them, we take their shelter and babies away.
Native plants should also be less upkeep by virtue of being native. They have developed to thrive in that environment. They've developed resistance to local bugs, and the local rainfall and temperature cycle.
I've met some people that say they enjoy yardwork, but that sure isn't me! I'd rather see cool spiders, dragonflies, bees, and butterflies. And with local wildflowers, it's something unique to where you live, I'd think people would enjoy that.
Grass is just another chore to me.
No do not clean up your leaves. Baby bugs use the leaves to keep warm in the winter. Cleaning up the leaves is reducing the population of helpful bugs.
I like to ask people i meet IRL if they have a lawn. Follow up question is why then?
A lot of people seem to be unaware of the history and origin of lawns. Put oversimply, they are and have always been about gross excess resources expenditure to show those around you how rich you are.
What's the fish doin'.
I just want bees back. My town used to have bees everywhere you looked and you could plant anything and you would get to harvest it later. Now you are lucky if you get a couple fruit/veggies per plant. Its not just bees either. The standard 'plant this to attract pollenators' plants don't help if there are no pollenators to attract.
I just happened to step outside late one night as the mosquito truck rolled by, with a dopey sounding single stroke engine pumping out a cloud of spray.
It works, we don't have any skeeters in our neighborhood. We also don't have lightning bugs, labybugs, dragonflies, butterflies, bees, or most other flying critters. We do have wasps, though. Those bastards are indestructible apparently.
I was in Queens, NY, in THE city, no woods, pastures, or even parks around anywhere nearby, and yet there were lightning bugs everywhere we went at night. We can't have them where we live next to nature, but they have them in the city, because they don't spray clouds of POISON down their streets, "for the bugs."
I mentioned this to group of residents recently, and we all agreed said that we'd be happy to trade a few skeeter bites each summer if it meant we could see lightning bugs and butterflies again.
I remember the fireflies in late summer outside the cities. They are nowhere to be found anymore, unfortunately.
I think one of the easiest ways to "reset" your baseline is to visit old growth/native forests. Those are some of the few untouched areas left and shows you what the land used to be like before we depleted everything.
That's getting harder and harder to do for a lot of people. 🥺
It's one of the reason I try to represent a lot of more rare and exotic owls here. A lot of stuff we will never have the opportunity to see, especially in person, so I want to at least make people see what needs protecting. I think that's why well-run zoos and animal education centers are so important. It's near impossible to get people to care about things that they don't know even exist.
There were a lot of places in the world that went in reverse from this scene. Managed/coppiced woodlands date to the Middle Ages, and resemble the first picture much more than the third.
I would also point out that there are plenty of completely natural areas that have resembled the first picture since time immemorial. Savannahs, scrublands, steppes, and prairies are naturally sparse in terms of large vegetation, due to the grazing of large herds of ungulates. These voracious herbivores rapidly destroy young trees, leaving wide gaps between the larger trees that have beat the odds to reach the critical size needed to survive.
In North America, the disappearance of bison (due to European settlers’ destruction of their populations) has led to woody forest encroachment on areas that were previously prairie grasslands with no trees. So in that case the whole progression shown in these pictures is running in reverse.
In my lifetime – and even more so in Sir David’s – the natural world has suffered an extraordinary and devastating decline. Since the spread of industrial agriculture, the planet has lost more than two-thirds of its wildlife populations. Today, 96 per cent of all mammal biomass on Earth is made up of humans and farmed animals. Just four per cent is wild.
At COP26, he ended his address with words that deserve to be remembered: “If working apart we are a force powerful enough to destabilise our planet, surely working together we are powerful enough to save it… In my lifetime I’ve witnessed a terrible decline. In yours, you could – and should – witness a wonderful recovery.”
what happened to the fireflies
I hear everyone getting rid of all the fallen leaves is a big reason fireflies aren't as common anymore. The leaves provide food, moisture, and shelter for the fireflies for the 2 years before they get wings. So when people collect all the leaves off the ground, they get rid of all the things that keep them alive.
1800 reminds me of

The first game literally made by furries and featured many old school furry artists. Some of which have died or are dying now.
The plastic bag really ties it together, and strangles you.
In the US there are more trees now than in 1950. We basically clearcut the country except some in the Pacific Northwest during the 1800's - early 1900's westward expansion. More plastic as well though.
Oddly there are more forests in the USA now than there were in 1950.
More individual forests, more square footage, or both?
I legitimately don't know, I'm not asking as a gotcha
German environmentalist Robinga Schnögelrögel recently talked about the shifting baseline syndrom, and he gave an example of how bad it is. He read a primary source from 1858 that talked about the biodiversity back then: Butterflys were described as "everywhere", hundreds on every meadow. A type of mayfly (ephoron virgo) hatched in rivers and congregated above, making it look like a snow flurry. The next day their dead bodies would cover the river banks, which farmers picked up by the wheelbarrow to use as fertilizer and feed to their pigs. Hence ephoron virgo's German name "Uferaas", meaning shore carrion.
There have been a couple interactions in my life where I've had to remind people that cornfields, livestock pastures, and even former farmland left to go wild for a few years aren't nature. They are distinctly and irreversibly human-centric areas, with human-dictated ecosystems and populations.
Just because they're green in color and far from a city doesn't mean they're natural. Your relatives who live in a big farmhouse out in the country aren't necessarily any closer to nature than someone living in an apartment in a city.
Some species (I can reference owls specifically, of course) do benefit from some types of man-made clearings. Field and orchards can provide nice open areas for those that hunt while flying or ones perched high on the periphery and have a great view of rodents going after dropped fruit or grains.
But when we leave nothing for the wildlife, use poisons or other deterrents, or add hazards, then we're just taking from the environment while giving nothing back. I've been happy to be able to highlight new programs for farmers and large landowners where they can get assistance or even get paid for turning corners of their properties back into those which will sustain biodiversity. A few weeks ago someone reached out saying their family had farmland and wanted to know what they could do to help owls and other wildlife. I directed them to their state wildlife commission to see what programs they had and they found a ton of things the state would help with.
Like anything else, there's good and bad ways to do things. People just need to become aware.
Superbowl
For owls that are superb.

Please scroll down to read our community rules.
US Wild Animal Rescue Database: Animal Help Now
International Wildlife Rescues: RescueShelter.com
Australia Rescue Help: WIRES
Germany-Austria-Switzerland-Italy Wild Bird Rescue: wildvogelhilfe.org
If you find an injured owl:
Note your exact location so the owl can be released back where it came from. Contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitation specialist to get correct advice and immediate assistance.
Minimize stress for the owl. If you can catch it, toss a towel or sweater over it and get it in a cardboard box or pet carrier. It should have room to be comfortable but not so much it can panic and injure itself. If you can’t catch it, keep people and animals away until help can come.
Do not give food or water! If you feed them the wrong thing or give them water improperly, you can accidentally kill them. It can also cause problems if they require anesthesia once help arrives, complicating procedures and costing valuable time.
If it is a baby owl, and it looks safe and uninjured, leave it be. Time on the ground is part of their growing up. They can fly to some extent and climb trees. If animals or people are nearby, put it up on a branch so it’s safe. If it’s injured, follow the above advice.
For more detailed help, see the OwlPages Rescue page.
Community Rules:
Posts must be about owls. Especially appreciated are photographs (not AI) and scientific content, but artwork, articles, news stories, personal experiences and more are welcome too.
Be kind. If a post or comment bothers you, or strikes you as offensive in any way, please report it and moderators will take appropriate action.
AI is discouraged. If you feel strongly that the community would benefit from a post that involves AI you may submit it, but it might be removed if the moderators feel that it is low-effort or irrelevant.
Also visit our twinned community for wholesome content: