1091

From Parklane Landscapes

Shifting Baseline Syndrome (SBS) is what happens when we forget how vibrant the natural world used to be. Each generation grows up with a more depleted environment and calls it "normal," simply because it's all they've ever known.

Think about walking through a park and thinking, "This seems healthy." But maybe 30 years ago that same park had twice as many birds, wildflowers, or insects. If you never saw that version, you don't feel the loss - and that quiet forgetting becomes the new baseline. Over time, we start accepting degraded ecosystems as normal.

Researchers warn that this shift lowers our expectations, increases our tolerance for decline, and reduces our urgency to protect what's left.

What helps:

Intergenerational conversations that reconnect us with what nature used to be.

Direct experiences with nature that sharpen our awareness of change.

Remembering (knowing) the past is the first step to restoring the future.

Not a sponsor, I don't think it's an AI graphic, and I think it has something important to say. Plus it does have an owl. We can't save our animals if we don't save them the spaces they need to thrive.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

what happened to the fireflies

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I hear everyone getting rid of all the fallen leaves is a big reason fireflies aren't as common anymore. The leaves provide food, moisture, and shelter for the fireflies for the 2 years before they get wings. So when people collect all the leaves off the ground, they get rid of all the things that keep them alive.

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I've heard that too. Whatever it is needs to stop.

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 108 points 3 days ago

One of the issues with this is that the previous generation that knows this best in my country is currently the least interested in talking about climate change. My parents grew up in a noticably different climate but they don't want to hear or say anything about this because to them confronting climate change means giving up convenience and if there's one thing boomers hate it's giving up convenience.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 67 points 3 days ago

I'm only 40 years old and I remember how different it was. If you went on a weekend trip your car would be splattered with insects all over. Our garden used to be full of butterflies and other insects. I've been stung so many times but for my kids it's a really rare occasion.

Not to mention the weeks of snow instead of the scattered few days we have now. And hardly anybody seems to care.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

I'm around the same age and notice the same things. I miss the fireflies and butterflies so much. Even the unloved bugs are gone. In summer the car always was plastered with dead bugs, and now that doesn't happen. A lot of notice things are gone, but even more unnoticed things are.

I feel that even though the collective "we" caused this, we as individuals have very little say on a lot of this. I can't get Coke to stop using plastic, I can't get Nestle to stop stealing groundwater, etc, and with decades of elected leaders letting us down, it's hard to come up with a plan of action. Individual actions like adding native plants back into your yard (that's what the company that shared this graphic does, which was why I was ok with sharing a business post), providing artificial animal nests and shelters, and just minding your own consumerism feels like a drop in the ocean, but I believe thousands or millions of us doing those tiny things is sadly going to be more effective in the near term than waiting for people in power to do the right thing. But it's often times hard to convince regular people of that.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

The irony is that we already killed the majority of medium to large animals by about 10,000 years ago. We are living during the last seconds of our extensive eradication program.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

We seem to be finally starting to wake up a little bit. We've brought back alligators, buffalo, and wolves. Probably still losing more than we're saving, but we're still pretty new at treating animals as more then NPCs. Formalized animal rehabs with standards only really became a thing in the 1970s and 80s. Even Roosevelt making national parks took until the start of the last century.

[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

We are getting better; the problem is getting too bad to ignore.

I know for a fact that the coffee I'm drinking is responsible for destroying a few sq. micrometers of rain forest, but it's hard to stop. We would need a fascist government to impose self-control.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I'm enjoying the coffee while I can too. I keep hearing that's soon going to be a victim of climate change.

Going authoritarian would be the fastest way to turn things around, but I don't really relish that idea. We were able to do beneficial ecological things in the past without going to that extreme. I'm just scared what point is going to take sinking to before saving the only planet we can live on to become apolitical again.

[-] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 days ago

I saw a post recently about how butterflies are always drawn like that, wings spread all the way out. That's only for dead/preserved specimens, in nature their wings are much more overlapped and I can't stop thinking about it

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 45 points 3 days ago

Most animals are drawn in a way that the viewer can identify them.

It's not a realistic image.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Interesting observation. Often one of the best times to spot and identify butterflies is really in the morning before they've warmed up and are basking in the sun with their wings wide open. I don't think it's unreasonable for people to draw butterflies as they're most easily seen.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

It has to do when they are for collectors they pull the wings up over the head, where naturally the wings dont usually extend above the head

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

I grew up in the 70s and 80s in the US. It is so much better now.

  • Deer were almost extinct in big parts the Midwest
  • Raptors were extremely rare
  • There weren’t Apex predators like mountain lions, cougars, or bobcats like there are now
  • There are so many more birds than when I was a kid

All this nihilism makes everybody feel hopeless. Meanwhile, people have been working towards improving the environment and there have been real payoffs.

Not that we’re done, but the efforts we’ve made have had real tangible changes for the positive.

The impact that Ducks Unlimited made just can’t be overstated.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] deafboy@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago
[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Things were much better back in my day. Everything went to hell around the Triassic. You kids wouldn't know, with your phones and your tablets and opposable thumbs.

EDIT: That was a good read btw

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

I just want bees back. My town used to have bees everywhere you looked and you could plant anything and you would get to harvest it later. Now you are lucky if you get a couple fruit/veggies per plant. Its not just bees either. The standard 'plant this to attract pollenators' plants don't help if there are no pollenators to attract.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 3 days ago

I just happened to step outside late one night as the mosquito truck rolled by, with a dopey sounding single stroke engine pumping out a cloud of spray.

It works, we don't have any skeeters in our neighborhood. We also don't have lightning bugs, labybugs, dragonflies, butterflies, bees, or most other flying critters. We do have wasps, though. Those bastards are indestructible apparently.

I was in Queens, NY, in THE city, no woods, pastures, or even parks around anywhere nearby, and yet there were lightning bugs everywhere we went at night. We can't have them where we live next to nature, but they have them in the city, because they don't spray clouds of POISON down their streets, "for the bugs."

I mentioned this to group of residents recently, and we all agreed said that we'd be happy to trade a few skeeter bites each summer if it meant we could see lightning bugs and butterflies again.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] schema@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I remember the fireflies in late summer outside the cities. They are nowhere to be found anymore, unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Hupf@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago
[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 7 points 3 days ago

The first game literally made by furries and featured many old school furry artists. Some of which have died or are dying now.

[-] Flower@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago

You see numbers like population reduced by 90% in the last x years. What's often forgotten that it was already reduced by 90% earlier, so actually only 1% is left. As illustrated here.

load more comments (1 replies)

One of the reasons is the trend of a boring, uniform yard. I remember growing up we had honey suckles, various plants and such in the yard, some were not pleasant to step on but had bio diversity. With the drive of a "perfect" lawn and the use of so many chemicals including pesticides and removal of native flora as well as trees, this has decreased bio-diversity. I hate lawns, I'd rather have natural grasses and shrubs and such.

Then people tell me "well you have to tend to those and it's a lot of work." No you don't, you tend to them because you're keeping up with the neighbors. Let them grow, water them when conditions require, clean up leaves in autumn. There's no need to modify plants for aesthetics, that's not what I'm interested in.

[-] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Or, leave the leaves, and have beautiful lightning bugs in the summer

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

What drives me a little crazy is in my metro the cheapest living is essentially in the burbs. I live at the end of the metro system basically which balances cost and access. If we subsidized high rises there would be so many people like myself that would go live downtown. I am old enough to have seen a lot of change. One thing that gets me is how areas that if you drove to when I was young would be farmland is not basically extended burbs. If people really want to live like that im fine but it should be cheapest to live in the highest density living area on a per square feet of finished indoor space to encourage less wasted living space.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The trend here seems to be converting old warehouses and factories to residential units, but they're all trendy high rent things. Other than that, it's still all single family McMansion neighborhoods that are around 500-800,000. Not sure where all these rich people are coming from, but I know I'm not in that club! 😄

I bought my condo at a terrible time, but it feels like a steal now compared to what I could afford today. I'm surrounded by trees, 2 parks, and a swamp, so it's pretty quiet, there's still a fair bit of wildlife, and a moderately good use of space. They keep building dang giant warehouses though, which stinks and brings truck traffic to roads that are way too narrow and full of tight turns.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

I feel that. Things are selling near me and even if I was working I could not afford it and as the prices rise the taxes do to so may not be able to afford what I have now for much longer unless things change massively.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

There were a lot of places in the world that went in reverse from this scene. Managed/coppiced woodlands date to the Middle Ages, and resemble the first picture much more than the third.

I would also point out that there are plenty of completely natural areas that have resembled the first picture since time immemorial. Savannahs, scrublands, steppes, and prairies are naturally sparse in terms of large vegetation, due to the grazing of large herds of ungulates. These voracious herbivores rapidly destroy young trees, leaving wide gaps between the larger trees that have beat the odds to reach the critical size needed to survive.

In North America, the disappearance of bison (due to European settlers’ destruction of their populations) has led to woody forest encroachment on areas that were previously prairie grasslands with no trees. So in that case the whole progression shown in these pictures is running in reverse.

[-] Slayan@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago

https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/fifty-years-ago-david-attenborough-changed-the-way-we-see-the-world-now-we-must-heed-his-warning-8294239

In my lifetime – and even more so in Sir David’s – the natural world has suffered an extraordinary and devastating decline. Since the spread of industrial agriculture, the planet has lost more than two-thirds of its wildlife populations. Today, 96 per cent of all mammal biomass on Earth is made up of humans and farmed animals. Just four per cent is wild.

At COP26, he ended his address with words that deserve to be remembered: “If working apart we are a force powerful enough to destabilise our planet, surely working together we are powerful enough to save it… In my lifetime I’ve witnessed a terrible decline. In yours, you could – and should – witness a wonderful recovery.”

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I get used to Vancouver BC, then if I fly to Toronto or past trips to the USA you really notice how shit their green areas are. Like the bottom image is the park behind my house. And this is everywhere in BC. The top picture is other cities if you took half the tree and animal pics out

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Some spots do better than others, for sure, but everywhere is always under pressure for something.

The Canadian gov really dropped the ball on saving your Spotted Owls. I think there is 1 female left and they want to build a ski resort in the middle of her territory. 😔

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Oddly there are more forests in the USA now than there were in 1950.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

More individual forests, more square footage, or both?

I legitimately don't know, I'm not asking as a gotcha

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I had some good linked info in this other reply to a similar comment if you want some more info about what tree are being replaced and by what.

https://lemmy.world/comment/23510279

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pirky@piefed.world 16 points 3 days ago

I think one of the easiest ways to "reset" your baseline is to visit old growth/native forests. Those are some of the few untouched areas left and shows you what the land used to be like before we depleted everything.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

That's getting harder and harder to do for a lot of people. 🥺

It's one of the reason I try to represent a lot of more rare and exotic owls here. A lot of stuff we will never have the opportunity to see, especially in person, so I want to at least make people see what needs protecting. I think that's why well-run zoos and animal education centers are so important. It's near impossible to get people to care about things that they don't know even exist.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
1091 points (99.2% liked)

Superbowl

6163 readers
287 users here now

For owls that are superb.

Please scroll down to read our community rules.

US Wild Animal Rescue Database: Animal Help Now

International Wildlife Rescues: RescueShelter.com

Australia Rescue Help: WIRES

Germany-Austria-Switzerland-Italy Wild Bird Rescue: wildvogelhilfe.org

If you find an injured owl:

Note your exact location so the owl can be released back where it came from. Contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitation specialist to get correct advice and immediate assistance.

Minimize stress for the owl. If you can catch it, toss a towel or sweater over it and get it in a cardboard box or pet carrier. It should have room to be comfortable but not so much it can panic and injure itself. If you can’t catch it, keep people and animals away until help can come.

Do not give food or water! If you feed them the wrong thing or give them water improperly, you can accidentally kill them. It can also cause problems if they require anesthesia once help arrives, complicating procedures and costing valuable time.

If it is a baby owl, and it looks safe and uninjured, leave it be. Time on the ground is part of their growing up. They can fly to some extent and climb trees. If animals or people are nearby, put it up on a branch so it’s safe. If it’s injured, follow the above advice.

For more detailed help, see the OwlPages Rescue page.

Community Rules:

Posts must be about owls. Especially appreciated are photographs (not AI) and scientific content, but artwork, articles, news stories, personal experiences and more are welcome too.

Be kind. If a post or comment bothers you, or strikes you as offensive in any way, please report it and moderators will take appropriate action.

AI is discouraged. If you feel strongly that the community would benefit from a post that involves AI you may submit it, but it might be removed if the moderators feel that it is low-effort or irrelevant.

Also visit our twinned community for wholesome content:

!wholesome@reddthat.com

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS