top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 159 points 5 months ago* (85 children)

What the fuck is "half a pickup truck" for a measure

  • source
  • hideshow 85 child comments
  • [–] 169 points 5 months ago (38 children)

    Americans will use anything other than the metric system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    As an american, I am 100% onboard on switching entirely to measuring things in terms of pickup trucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 5 months ago (8 children)
    1. Preheat oven to 1 pickup truck
    2. Bake for 1 pickup truck
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Since most automobiles are water-cooled, the pickup truck temp is probably about 110 f / 43 c, so you'd want to preheat to 3 1/2 pickup trucks.

    Similarly, since the mean life of trucks is probably 20 years, we'd measure casual time in a subdivisions of 175,320 hours / 10,519,200 minutes. One picotruck would be 1/10th of a minute, so you want to bake for 300 pico-trucks

    We will of course maintain this system once trucks become 50-year lived semi-autonomous drones that never get over 35 c, because the one constant in defining units is that rejiggijng definitions is preferred to technical precison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago* (14 children)

    This is a Canadian publication.

    EDIT:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Narwhal

    The Narwhal is a Canadian investigative online magazine that focuses on environmental issues.[1][2]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Unfortunately, a lot of Americanisms have infected Canada due to our historically extremely close trade and cultural relationship with them. Measurement ignorance is one example. Some Americanisms actually become arguably worse in Canada, because we are effectively rudderless, pulled in all different directions by both our own laws and customs and American laws and customs at the same time, resulting in an even less well-defined choice of units. Another example is dates. The US uses mm/dd/yy which is already stupid on its own, but Canada uses BOTH mm/dd/yy and dd/mm/yy seemingly without rhyme or reason, which results in complete ambiguity of many dates, or trying to figure out based on context, looking for other dates that might use a day number >12 to identify which one actually is the day vs the month.

    It's awful. I am happy we are distancing ourselves from the US right now, but I'm not sure it will ever be enough to totally escape their shadow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    Two of them is roughly the size of a pickup truck...

    Like, it's volume, they could say X gallons, but it would be hard for people to visualize. So people use an example most readers would be familiar with.

    Have you honestly never wondered why journalists use random things? Or has no one taken the time to answer before?

    It's been common literally for centuries before either of us were born, but most likely all of human existence. Just with animals like buffalo instead of pickup trucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (23 replies)
    [–] 67 points 5 months ago (23 children)

    falling from the the sky and burning is a good thing, bigger concern is them staying up there for too long

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    falling from the the sky and burning is a good thing

    Jury is still out on this one.

    “We’re really changing the composition of the stratosphere into a state that we’ve never seen before,” said John Dykema, an applied physicist at SEAS, who warns that scientists today poorly understand many of the impacts.

    https://salatainstitute.harvard.edu/burning-satellites-in-the-stratosphere-emerging-questions-for-climate/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    falling from the sky onto things is a problem tho

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 57 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    As was always the plan for these satellites.

    The article raises a vague concern about Kessler syndrome. This is exactly why these satellites are designed to deorbit once their useful lifespan is finished. I don't see what the point of this article is at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Yeah, they actually design them with reentry in mind to maximize the burn-up and ensure no pieces hit the ground. I recall they had a bit of difficulty when they first introduced laser data links to the design because the lenses the satellites used were large pieces of glass that would make it to the ground on reentry, they had to redesign them to fragment more easily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Then read the article. They found debris from starlink satellites on the ground, which is horrifying if you consider they want to increase the number of satellites by a factor of 100x and make them much bigger to build datacenters in space.
    That plan would lead to one re-entry every three minutes, depositing insane amounts of plastics and metals in the atmosphere even if they would burn up completely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 44 points 5 months ago* (10 children)

    How awesome would it be for Donald Trump, Joe Rogan, Dana White, and Elon Musk himself to get smashed by a Musk satellite during a photo op in the octagon at the White House UFC fight.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 5 months ago (10 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 31 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    r/AnythingButMetric

    or whatever the Lemmy Syntax would be

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    I don't understand what kind of capitalist pig you need to be to allow private companies access to low orbit.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    It's impossible to regulate space. Even if your government put restrictions on putting things in orbit, the company could just launch under the flag of somewhere else. Blanket banning of commercial space programs would require a universal treaty or would lead to an act of war. Im not saying the US shouldn't try and do something about space trash, but it's not as simple as "just ban corporations from space"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 22 points 5 months ago

    Watch out, It's the trickle down economics ^tm^

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    I need a banana for size comparison.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    Once again, Americans will use anything except the metric system to measure things.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    and, is that half an F150 or half a Ranger?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    I yearn for the day Kessler Syndrome finally locks us on this rock with the billionaires that have ruined this planet for personal gains.

    Their hastily built escape rockets coming face to face with chunks of debris travelling at orbital velocity, would truly be poetic justice.

    Heralding the beginning of an actual civilised society, one without the people that spend their lives manipulating world governments and public opinion through lobbying and mass media.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    The syndrome is kind of already in effect it's just in very early cycles. It was a few months ago the ISS made emergency maneuvers to avoid debris and a few weeks ago some telecom satellite lost comms and they assume from debris. Won't be long as more debris multiplies that it becomes unmanageable and untraceable so bad that your scenario starts happening.

    Although realistically with the strides we've made in orbital liftoff weights they'll probably start armoring shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago*

    Given that they left the shuttle booster unpainted to save on weight, I doubt we'll be able to launch anything with armour that can stop anything but the smallest shards from doing damage, we also already amrour everything to protect against the constant bombardment of space debris, where even a spec of dust can create a 2mm hole

    https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/Hypervelocity_impacts_and_protecting_spacecraft

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Depending on trajectory, space debris in orbit can hit you with up to 10x the velocity of an armor-piercing sabot round (which is just a metal dart). So even tanks on earth aren't armored nearly enough to survive space debris.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›