Indeed. Or charge them fees for their power consumption that would pay for the construction of additional generating capacity. This is how it is with any new expansion of industrial demand, there's going to be a need to build up the infrastructure to match. This is normally considered a good thing when you manage it properly.
These headlines are getting truly hysterical.
Robots don't eat soup so that was the first layer of defense. The label is the second layer.
On federated platforms like Lemmy, a small number of highly active users can also create the impression of a broader cultural shift.
And bear in mind that this goes in both directions, it's possible for highly active anti-AI users to flood the discourse.
Community opinion is often a bistable state. If 70% of the userbase has opinion A and is constantly downvoting and browbeating anyone who says anything positive about opinion B, one would naturally expect the userbase to soon be 80% opinion A. Then 90%. And so forth. The few holdouts who continue to say positive things about opinion B get labelled as "bots" and "trolls" and are dismissed.
Maybe it's just that the world isn't as uniform in their anti-AI opinion as you imagine it to be? Social media inherently forms bubbles, smaller platforms like the Fediverse even moreso than most. As the Fediverse grows opinions are likely to become more diverse.
Give it a few months and the gold leaf is flaking off, and they start fixing it with spray paint. It's all so poetic.
They were already pretty hard to defend.
They would also stone you to death for wearing clothing of mixed fabric.
Religions always pick and choose which rules to apply and how to apply them.
He hasn't actually managed to secure that deal yet. He might easily get something worse.
view more: next ›
FaceDeer
0 post score0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
Prosecute everything.