1026
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 123 points 2 years ago

I learned so much over the years abusing Cunningham's.

Could have a presentation for the C-suite for a major company, post some tenuous claim related to what I intended to present on, and have people with PhDs in the subject citing papers correcting me with nuances that would make it into the final presentation.

It's one of the key things I miss about Reddit. The scale of Lemmy just doesn't have the same rate and quality of expertise jumping in to correct random things as a site with 100x the users.

[-] [email protected] 62 points 2 years ago

The major problem with reddit is that you could never really trust the credentials of the person you were talking to. They might have been PhDs or they might have been 13 year olds who just learned to Google. It amazes me how many times I saw a highly upvoted comment posted about a subject that I knew a lot about, but was just so blatantly wrong.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Yeah voting on content has nothing to do with quality and everything to do with feelings.

People just vote for their side of any discussion, regardless of validity.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Only if it's something controversial. If it's something technical with no political affiliation, people vote for answers that sound right. Thankfully Cunningham's usually comes to the rescue on time.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

To be fair this is not a Reddit thing and it can be found in the fediverse too. I can remember some of such situations where a person just posted wrong stuff but in a very confident way. I was able to prove him wrong later but nobody cared anymore.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

cunningham's law is intended to be used recursively

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

As long as they provide appropriate sources then it doesn't really matter who they are

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

There's no clear winner between a 13yo who can use a search engine and a crusty old PhD who can't keep up with changing times.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Especially if you move 0.1% away from that PhD's particular specialty.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I mean, unironically exactly why people think LLMs are smart.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Unless the thing falls under non-commercial electronics or computing. The community on here is skewed towards that for obvious reasons.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

I always kind of felt like those voices began to be drowned out the more and more popular reddit became. You're correct about Lemmy's scale, but there is certainly a sweet spot. I'm happy knowing Lemmy hasn't yet reached its own, and reddit's is long gone. I'm happier here and it's likely only going to get better.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Errmmmmh achstually.., lol

[-] [email protected] 100 points 2 years ago

i do the same thing. its called Murphy's law :D

[-] [email protected] 135 points 2 years ago

I know what you're doing but I can't help myself. It's Cunningham's law.

[-] [email protected] 55 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

Cole's Law: if there's a salad, I want that one.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Brannigan’s Love is like Brannigan’s cole slaw, wet and chunky.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The spirit is willing but the flesh is spongy and bruised.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Took me a minute to realize this was a pun... shame on me.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Cole's law is best with a burger.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

I'll be honest you almost for me

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Ahem, it’s called Poe’s law

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Nah thats called laws of thermodynamics! And they were made up by Elvis together with is homy Obama (the guy without last name) who were known for their contributions to biology

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago

imo it's not that correcting feels better than helping but rather it's easier to correct someone than draft an answer of your own.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

Sometimes that's part of the issue (or the whole deal), but sometimes it's not even that.

Sometimes it's that someone asked something difficult and elaborate to answer, which has been answered a ton of times, and it's tedious to answer again and again. But if someone answers with misinformation or even straight FUD, then one needs to feel the urge to correct that to prevent misinformation.

I suffered that with questions in r/QtFramework. Tons of licensing questions, repeated over and over, from people who have not bothered to read a bit about such a well known and popular license as LGPL. Then someone who cares little for the nuance answers something heavy handed, and paints a wrong picture. Then I can't let the question pass. I need to correct the shitty answer. :-(

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I would say that if someone asks a difficult question it's often difficult because it's very general, so you don't have any specific point to answer that you know will satisfy the person asking.

On the other hand, if someone is writing misinformation then they provide specific statements which still may be difficult to correct but you have those anchor points you can refer to.

So I guess the thing here is that if someone, after asking a question, writes a BS answer they actually refine their question and narrow its scope, thus making it easier to answer.

I usually see broad questions about rather simple things unanswered, but very specific yet difficult questions answered

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago

ACTually, they're still helping you, so it would be better to say correcting = helping.

Sincerely,

Definitely not Gollum's alt.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Don't asks us, precious.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Nicely corrected, thanks.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

My coworkers had a hard time picking resturaunts, so I started recommending McDonald's for work parties, and then everyone else started chiming in with actually good ideas.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

This is like putting a $10 price tag on a free sidewalk item so someone will steal it.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

It's an older meme, sir, but it checks out. I was just about to upvote it.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Who post programming questions on Reddit? Are you looking for answers in meme format?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

reddit was/is much more than a meme site

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Honestly, meme communities' comments could have some of the best in-depth discussions. Memes tend to provide a great launching point for discussions. A sort of prompt that everyone can coalesce around to talk in a serious manner about the subject.

/r/dndmemes and /r/programmerhumor were two great examples.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

And they're still pretty good on Lemmy!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Omg I didn’t even realise which community I was in as I made that comment!

But yeah, this one and [email protected] are both great.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There are serious programming subs. However, I find that those tend to debate/discuss solutions/approaches moreso than the actual code itself, although that's not unheard of either. For actual coding questions, I want to say there's a "learn programming" sub that has those, but they're pretty strict about just doing people's homework for them (those posts tend to be pretty obvious).

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Where would you post them?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

DUPLICATED, CLOSED, etc.

Joke aside, for an open question I'd prefer posting on Reddit/Lemmy/forums to have an open answer.

SO is too strict on its policy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The validation system is extremely off-putting. I have been working on some specialized tools for years so I could have answered some very precise questions with good confidence. However, the system was always there to detrust me and I was not going to spend hours to go through their hoops for an answer that takes me 10 min to redact. So instead I'll post it on Reddit or a gist hopping people will be able to discover it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Almost like that xkcd joke...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I was trying to remember where I read this originally. Thank you.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1026 points (95.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

23711 readers
2186 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS