It was mentioned on the official podcast, Braving the Elements, I think. Or else at their comic con panel.
Obviously with Paramount being what they are, there's still the chance that they turn around and cancel it later, but at least right now the status quo would lead to 4 coherent seasons.
They seem to have already confirmed four seasons of Seven Havens, so they're in a much better position than they were with Korra where they thought season 1 would be the only one...then season 2, and then 3 & 4 could be planned at least partly together.
Huh? The fact that people are supposedly going to be "forced" to show this is the entire point of the meme. Like, there's no other content in the meme. If that's wrong, we're left with nothing.
Sure, maybe. Still doesn't change the fact that nobody has yet presented (or even attempted to present) an explanation for the bizarre description in the post.
Nothing I have seen has said anyone will be "forced" to host it. They'll find some platform that is specifically willing to promote fascism.
I don't think that addresses the question. At least not the question that led me to go "huh?" when I saw this.
Which is that...yeah, the US is going to be murdering a dude on livestream. But what has that got to do with "content mods" who now "have to host" a video?
Only Swans I know are Sydney AFL. Is there also a Swans in Melbourne?
They build it where they think it'll being them the most profit. Every denial reduces the profitability and thus reduces the amount they'll invest in data centres in the future. It's obviously a good thing, if you are opposed to increasing use of fossil fuels, to deny a permit to a building that will burn heaps of fossil fuels.
Your comment is the same kind of bullshit nonsense that leads some morons to saying things like "it's ok that we send weapons to aid Israel's genocide of Palestinians. If we didn't, someone else would." Or "we don't have to worry about our coal exports to other countries when accounting for our climate change impact. If we didn't sell it to them, someone else would."
It's obviously wrong, arrived at purely thanks to some incredible motivated reasoning.
Yeah you'd feel especially bad if, for example, it was parked there legally while you were out of town and never saw the "don't park here on this night" notice.
Here’s me trying the same for the uncropped version
Ok I'm even more confused now. That looks like it lines up pretty well, considering how the dirt & grass mess with things. I understand that you have an uncropped version now that you didn't have originally. Not sure where that came from because until now I've only ever seen the cropped version. But now I understand you do seem to know what you're doing, which makes me even more confused why your original version had those straight horizontal lines. What were those meant to be? Why didn't you have the lines following the direction of the path in that version like you did here?
Oof. Wonder what that's gonna cost them?
Bro what are you talking about? What are those horizontal lines supposed to represent? The photo is very obviously not taken straight on to the path, which is why it runs diagonally. The sign also appears to be facing roughly directly away from the path, so it runs at a similar diagonal.
More to the point…it's text on a sign. It's one of the easiest things to show is AI when it's actually AI. AI often does weird shit with characters even at the best of times, and try to get it to emulate the perspective on text that's askew and it's got no hope. But here there's nothing.
I'd say you're clutching at straws, but there aren't even straws here to clutch at. Not even paper straws that have sat overnight in a drink.
