top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 107 points 5 months ago (3 children)

good linux phones can't come soon enough

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

    Unfortunately, Sailfish OS uses a proprietary (closed source) android compatibility layer, as well as a closed source UI.

    For the parts they have open-sourced, they implementrd a CLA that contributers must sign. It's the HA-CLA-I-ANY license, which specifically allows them a perpetual Copyright and Patent license, and permission to relicense your code contributions to a more restrictive license which enables them sell or package it into a closed-source proprietary app.

    Personally I'd be more comfortable supporting the development of PostmarketOS instead, since it is completely open-source with no CLA, meaning no chance of any rug-pulling in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 74 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    De-googled Android ROMs:

    • GrapheneOS
    • LineageOS
    • /e/ OS
    • Volla OS

    Linux OSes that (allegedly) work on Android hardware (please suggest additions):

    • UBPorts
    • PostMarketOS

    Non-android, non-apple smartphones:

    • Pinephone
    • Pinephone pro
    • Librem 5
    • Volla Phone 22
    • Jolla Phone
    • FuriPhone FLX1s

    And pretty much every feature phone out there (way too many to list)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 74 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    If some company did this with computers 20 years ago they would probably go bankrupt the next year. This is what happens when tech oligarchies are allowed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This is almost what apples infrastructure is....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    The main difference is they (Apple) have been clear with their design choice since the beginning and they had their own market. Google is imposing this change on many users who did not want such an ecosystem to start with. But I suppose the market share of people who won't care about this will be large enough that they will survive, because they are a tech monopoly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Totally degoogled graphene phones can't come soon enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 5 months ago (3 children)
    [–] 39 points 5 months ago

    Stolen from elsewhere:

    You are not getting screwed on this. Google is just applying lube.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    i have come to love just not owning a smartphone anymore.

    World is way more of an adventure when you out and about without internet connection on you.

    Wana know how to get somewhere? Find a map or ask someone.

    Pay something? There is cash for that.

    Wana take a picture? Just take a camera with you, because lets be real 99% of the pics in your smartphones camera roll wont get viewed ever again anyhow.

    Wana meet with other people? Well make out a time and spot before u leave the house...

    Wana be reachable to others while u out and about? Dont! Its a wonderfull feeling not to be.

    Wana pass some time while waiting for someone/something? Bring a book.

    Sure it may be inconvinient for others that you are not instantly reachable 24/7. But its a wonderfull feeling not to be. To comunicate on your own terms.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    Spoken like someone who isn't responsible for others. My kid is ADHD and autistic. She's high functioning, but that doesn't mean I get to just be unreachable. I'm several people's emergency contacts. I have to travel unknown places all the time and be there exactly to get the help my kid needs.

    I'm a single mother. I trade off whatever they are stealing from me for the ability to get cheaper versions of what my kid needs. My job is flexible, so it allows me to take my kid to what she needs with the understanding that I can answer questions when I'm away.

    Oh, I also have a deadly neurodegenerate disease that is only kept in check by this specific medication that I need to be places for a while to get. I like my phone reminding me to go get that and also being able to fill out the paperwork on my phone because of my shitty hands.

    A lot of people I see who are like, "Just live without a phone!" Are not the people who are actually responsible for people and/or things. I was like that when I was young, but then you know, I became a pillar of my family and friend network. People who are unreachable when needed are dropped from my network. I know several people who when I actually needed them and it was very dire, were unreachable. I left them messages and everything. Nope. Don't think they ever knew the issue. Dropped. Sorry even in the 90s and 00s, you were expected to listen to your voice mails promptly. I shouldn't have to mount a search party to find you, which is actually necessary for some people I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 29 points 5 months ago

    And then after doing all that you still need to confirm a scary warning every single time you install an app. As if it wasn't enough.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Openness was the primary reason I always stuck with android. Without that, fuck them. If I have no options I'm just gonna use Huawei.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Can anyone explain how this isn't an illegal monopoly? I'm genuinely curious

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Because there are more iPhones in America.

    Ignore that Apple also makes it impossible to side load apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Apple was the canary in the coal mine for this behavior in the EU. Apple was forced to allow third party apps, so Apple mandated that everyone had to register with them, and pay them their yearly fee, and then developers had to pay Apple another fee (core technology fee, still double dipping), and governments were completely fine with that. (And developers will happily jump through more hoops to develop on iOS).

    Google saw this and decided if they can, so can Google. And this technically is the easier of the two as at least this doesn't require every developer to register with Google this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Confirm with biometrics... WTF?!

    People should have the universal right to live a cellphone-free life. In my country, it is assumed that everyone uses an iPhone or a Google Android phone as if it was part of your own self.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I'd be interested in seeing a statistic of how much this reduces the impact of intentionally malicious apps. I know it's not the real motivation, but still.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Is this actually 100% true?

    I know Google/Android/Alphabet sucks but this seems over the top even for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Thanks. The xheet and this article are almost identical.

    protective waiting period

    triggers me. It only protects their business interests, because that's the biggest of the multiple hurdles that are all designed to disincentivize people from doing that.

    Also read: security theater

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    I wouldn't go quite that far. It doesn't only protect their business interest; it definitely does achieve the goals they claim—like helping non-tech-literate users to avoid getting scammed with malware—it's just they're only doing it this way because it also aligns with their business interest.

    To that end I'd contest the "Security Theater" label. All security measures are ultimately implemented in a way that defends the interests of the owners. It's just that people have forgotten or aren't aware that Proprietary Software means they're not the owners.

    Of course if it was just about users' safety, the most effective way to help people avoid getting scammed is to educate them, but that would make people less dependent on Google and less susceptible to vendor lock-in, and people may even start having dangerous thoughts like "it sure is weird how many identifying traits of a scam are also just standard business practices for large corporations like Google."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    All for a scam, that rarely happens...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Graphene os is a good alternative to android. Its privacy and security focused, and also does not come with google serviced preinstalled. The only problem is that its only supported on google pixels, and porting it to other devices is impossible.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Didn't I hear that they're planning to release graphene on Motorola?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    I mean, getting verified as a developer is a similar pain in the ass in other ecosystems. I recently got an LG smart TV and the developer mode there automatically runs out and deletes all unofficial apps after 9999h if you don't manually go into the developer app and extend the time.

    My hot take is that you shouldn't have to claim that you're a developer to sideload content. It should be allowed for normal users 🤷

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I am not 100% clear on this. Is sideloading different from installing an APK from unknown source by simply taping on it?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    No that is side loading, and they're making it more difficult

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago

    If I understood correctly, installing an app from any source that's not GooglePlay or the official app store of the device manufacturer is 'side loading' in that regard. Thus, this also applies to e.g. F-Droid or Aurora.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (19 children)

    So what's the user experience like on an alternative OS?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›