100
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] teft@piefed.social 38 points 6 days ago

Man, sunk cost fallacy is really running rampant in silicon valley.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's not sunk cost fallacy at all. They see this as well worth the investment. They're making people put time into training their AI models. People are basically training the clueless intern who will take their job very soon. AI is done with training on all material that exists online. Now you have to force people to engage with it to give it more training.

[-] moustachio@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It’s not at risk of taking anyone’s job anytime soon. They have yet to even come close to LLMs being able to “know” what a right answer is. All they’re doing now is generating what their models predict you want to see. That’s why they produce slop that breaks down if you look closely.

[-] Shirasho@lemmings.world 20 points 6 days ago

It may be slower, but they think it is cheaper, thereby making it more profitable. These idiots only see short term profit and don't care about the long term health of the company or the economy.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Terminator 2 warned us that the future was humanity enslaved to robots.

What they didn't tell us was how stupid the whole thing started.

[-] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

I hope they go all in and then implode when the ai bubble pops.

[-] LLMhater1312@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago

They think its worth the gamble because the ultimate payoff is they won't need to pay humans

[-] moustachio@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I think they know they’re not going to have infinite humans at their disposal they have now, sometime soon.

They built their bunkers, now they need the subservient labor class they enjoyed.. in the form of AI.

[-] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

It’s their wet dream to be able to get rid of all their workers.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

Yeah, my company's like that too. I'm like, why are we spending tokens when we know what the fix is and the AI isn't listening?

I think they believe that we're gaining the skills to navigate the AI?

I get it because it can accelerate a lot of development in certain ways, but like, we're also losing the mental map of the codebase with this. I think it'd matter less for projects but for products ... it's weird to be like, "I never write code any more!" and be proud of it ... although to be fair, I haven't written much code after I became a lead.

[-] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

AI is expensive, slow and ineffective, but by Bezos bald head we'll use it!

Bezos is right Amazon has to adopt AI or die trying.

[-] Denjin@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago

Please let it be the latter.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
100 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6523 readers
831 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS