99
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 35 points 2 weeks ago

anakin-padme-2 “So that means the next Democrat president will charge him with war crimes, right?”

anakin-padme-3

anakin-padme-4 “Right?”

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Plugging Hegseth into war crimes to charge him to 100%.

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago

They don't care

They say these things because they don't care

They don't care if there are rules or anything

They don't care if they're warmongering, blood-spilling pieces of waste

They just don't care

A bunch of wild hogs who should be illegal-to-say sooner rather than later

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

The Iraqi people seem to have minded.

[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but we can all agree that the world would be a better place if Pete Hegseth were drawn and quartered, even if we forgot what that means.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago
[-] acab_means_cop_Dva@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

The law means something sweaty trump-kaneki

[-] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, even ignoring the illegality of it, if you're operating from the standpoint of keeping our troops safe (not that I am), this is a catastrophic message to broadcast because it means basically every single person you attack will fight to the death because surrender means death anyway.

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

Also, war crimes go both ways. They don't exist as a moral judgement. They exist as rules both sides agree to so war doesn't have to be worse than it already is. If you give no quarter, the cops aren't going to come and arrest you. Instead, the other side will give no quarter. You use chemical weapons? They can now use chemical weapons.

The one that will really fuck with the US if they do kill Iranian POWs is the Iranians have nothing stopping them sinking every American ship they come across and letting the survivors drown. That goes for civilian ships as well as military ships. And no one is going to risk their lives trying to move through the Gulf.

These ghouls think this posturing makes them look tough because they don't care about international law. That's a good way to find yourself in a "find out" phase.

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes but could you consider optics? Doing war crimes but saying otherwise is not as bad as doing war crimes and saying it was intended.

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

828 readers
650 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS