236
submitted 19 hours ago by xc2215x@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago

Duh, this is your party, Bobo.

It turns out that the Republican Party is chock full of Republicans.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 141 points 19 hours ago

Ahh fuck off. You were backing a dude who admitted on camera to walking in on teenage girls changing and was civily liable for rape. Don't act surprised hes protecting pedos

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 65 points 19 hours ago

Didn't she and her husband get together when she was a minor and he was 24 and had been convicted of indecent exposure to 2 minors at a bowling alley?

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 60 points 19 hours ago

She was one of the minors, IIRC.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 15 points 18 hours ago

True love, yo. /s

But let's let her keep going after them even if stupid, any opposition can be beneficial.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yeah, in the time honored tradition he pulled out his tiny hog in front of kids and then one of them married him. The one who became a grandma at 36. Said grandchild providing his dad with two separate charges of child abuse in 20 months.

The one who, as a US representative, was cranking hogs at the theatre while smoking the weed, before screaming at security who threw her out, denying everything 100% before security footage was released.

So yeah pretty much on the high ground.

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

He also admitted to Billy Bush and a camera crew that he grabs women’s private parts, and suggested that they let him do it because he’s famous. Additionally, during that same confession, he admitted to kissing women without permission, citing he can’t control himself.

You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.

When the tape was released, Trump said it was “locker room talk”. Which is literally not the point at all. The fact that you talk about abuse in only selective settings doesn’t absolve the abuse itself.

Additionally, in a 2023 deposition regarding a defamation lawsuit, Trump was questioned about the tape, and in response to whether stars can grab women by the genitals, replied:

Well, historically, that's true with stars.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

She protected a pedophile all the same

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 15 hours ago

She gives handies in public so yeah this checks out, very much against cover ups.

[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 51 points 17 hours ago

Boebert gonna be the next high-profile Republican to pull an MTG and start telling the truth to try and save herself?

Sorry, lady. Rats deserting a sinking ship are still fucking rats.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

True. But they can be useful rats.

She can’t redeem herself at this point but she can still do things to create a thorn in their sides. And I’m totally for that.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yeah, we should be supporting her for this move. Make her feel good about it so that she doesn’t stop. That doesn’t change anything about her past actions, but we don’t want to make stop. It’s like the police offering a plea deal for snitching. We aren’t giving anything up by regarding this as a positive move on her behalf.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 16 hours ago

MTG and Handy Boebert are just windsocks trying to stay in power. Both got elected just by telling morons what they wanted to hear.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 60 points 19 hours ago

Isn't Boebert the one who met her baby daddy by him flashing her while she was underage at a bowling alley and then she not only lied to to the cops to protect him, she made her friends lie to?

Like, she's right here. But she's been covering up for child abusers since she was a child.

How is she shocked the people who celebrated her also protect child abusers? That's likely why they liked her in the first place.

[-] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Also was supposedly an escort on a sugar daddy site prior to jumping on the MAGA grift.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Fuck Boebert

[-] rozodru@piefed.world 42 points 18 hours ago

ma'am you can't get on the MTG grift. your own kid(s) are a product of statutory rape. your own son has been charged what? twice now for child abuse?

you don't get a say in the matter.

[-] lmdnw@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

Why are the American people are so stupid? They literally vote for pedophile rapists and then complain that the pedophile rapists don’t agree to disclose their actions as sexual assaulters. That’s like buying a wasps nest and then complaining that they won’t stop stinging you.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Why are the American people are so stupid?

Propaganda works. Sometimes it takes a long time and sometimes it’s quick, but it always works.

Also, it’s coming for everyone, so head’s up.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

Why are the American people are so stupid?

my theory: high fat diets clogging brain blood flow. Also why RFK wants you to eat more fat.

[-] homes@piefed.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Takes one to know one, scumbag

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 17 hours ago

She's been consistently against pedo rings operating out of pizzeria basements, so I don't see this as an about-face.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Shaming the GOP is new for her.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

So is she startung to realize she was a useful idiot this whole time?

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 17 hours ago

OMG, imagine next elections are Kamala-AOC vs MTG-Bobert. And Republicans win again. How crazy would that be?

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

It wouldn't be surprising honestly. There are enough morons in America that it neuters any expectation of sanity I ever had for the country

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 17 hours ago

AOC would never VP for Kamala

[-] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 3 points 16 hours ago

Theater lady says not to cover up

Theater lady who was a minor that had an adult expose himself to her in a bowling alley

Theater lady who lied to protect said adult exposing himself to other minors

/ironic.jpg

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Theater lady who was a minor that had an adult expose himself to her in a bowling alley

i don't blame her for being the victim of a crime. i do blame her for her actions after tho.

[-] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 2 points 3 hours ago

Aye, I don't think there's an easy way to really express how a teenager's actions, even if they are at the upper end of that spectrum, carry a responsibility and culpability that are quite different than an adult's, and also different than a tween's, and especially different than a child of 7-10, and completely different than a child younger than that.

I do have to raise an eyebrow at someone who was caught giving a stroke at a high school play though.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

That was a high school play? I thought it was a movie. Til. Also, wtf who is aroused at high school plays

[-] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Oh, damn. I definitely was mistaken. It said denver theater (and some clarify that it was a broadway style production) in the news articles I just looked up. I don't even know how I messed that up.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It was a republican scandal, easy to assume she was being indecent at a children's puppet show (not a fun saucy adult puppet show or anything) so I get you

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Chicken Lady finally grows a conscience. Sure

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 3 points 18 hours ago

"Right after you slam the door and loudly yell "Daddy's home!" like you were Tucker Carlson in the middle of removing his belt."

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
236 points (97.6% liked)

politics

28762 readers
2759 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS