this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
739 points (99.5% liked)

World News

32353 readers
817 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 188 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I'd like to see a law where this immediately dissolves the company.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yep, there needs to be real consequences. In addition, no member of that board or executive team should be able to act in those positions in any company for like 5 yrs.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be a very effective way to keep them out of those positions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Can you not be on a company board from prison?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rich and powerful don’t live by the same set of laws, so there won’t be. Best they can do is a slap on the wrist with no further impact.

Amazon has remained untouched from their price fixing, AmazonBasic product rip offs, union busting, poor worker conditions, etc.

This too shall pass uneventfully

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Corporation - n.

An ingenious method for securing individual profit without individual responsibility.

  • Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Damn you for being exactly right!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I don't think the company needs to be dissolved, but I think that accountability for the law should exist at director level and up. For a company the size of Amazon, that's probably around 100 people that should face the consequences - and that's only the retail org.

The best description of Amazon is that it is a management company. It's not a retailer, or a tech company. It's output is its management process, and it's this that it uses to build products in different markets.

So, remove the source of those processes. Let people move up to higher roles, and let someone not breaking the law take the senior positions.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but then how would I be able to get that napkin holder that I ordered in my underwear delivered tomorrow! You don’t understand how much I need this thing right now even though I can’t be bothered to get dressed and drive my ass to the store.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

How about if the company is so large and sewn into the fabric of the modern world then instead of dissolving the company it instantly becomes a public utility, turn the shares into treasury bonds, and jail the executives?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 year ago (2 children)

wow, turns out that telling criminals that youre going to be looking for evidence in a few months isn't actually a good idea. who could have guessed?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you have the list of all documents before and after, you let the defendant do the discovery for you

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If you have some drugs in your home, police will do a no-knock raid.

If you steal billions, they let you know months in advance and also adapt to your schedule.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago (2 children)

of course they did, the penalty for getting caught destroying evidence is far, far less than the penalty for the price fixing they're accused of. the law is designed to incentivize them to do this.

we could make it so that the penalty for destroying evidence in a court case once its been subpoenaed is twice the penalty of the original case, but we don't. we could make CEOs responsible for the actions of their employees (after all, they're quick to claim responsibility for the actions of their employees when those actions generate money), but we don't.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

It's not though. It usually laxed but generally rules of procedure allow a judge to accept spoliation as proof of the crime they're accused of.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's not going to stop until we start holding executives physically responsible for their crimes in disfiguring ways. "Why is the right half of your face missing, Bob?" "Insider trading" he writes on an index card because he's been debarked.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I will only be surprised if someone actually ends up going to prison. More likely, the company will just get hit with a fine that's just the cost of doing business.

Although Romney said, "Corporations are people too, my friend" you can't throw Amazon in jail.

Closest they can do is a forced break up. A "Ma Bell" so to speak 🔔

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I am sure they hired a fall guy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Amazon now has to direct all managers watch a data retention video every year for the next five years, is allowed two years to roll this out, and can appeal in 3 years.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Just behead them all and be done with it, we know they're guilty.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to know that they'll be going to jail over this.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

oh wow crazy the capitalists are ghoulish liars who fucking knew

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like that would be illegal and they should be on trial. I wonder if I went into Amazon and started to destroy a PC or two would I be held accountable?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not if you destroy the evidence that you destroyed a PC! /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago