The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @feed@404media.co

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 293 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Admittedly, this is cyberpunk as fuck. 

Should not be needed… but it’s a fucking cool solution. 

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 160 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    Wasnt there a ton of outrage and such incl people not being allowed on planes, back when google glass was released?

    Why is it all OK now?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 6 months ago

    Same reason our governments suck ass. Something unpopular tries to get passed again, and again, and again, and again, and eventually people get desensitized and worn out from trying to fight against it. That or it hits on the right time when people are distracted by something else bigger or more important.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 6 months ago

    Many years of indoctrination. When Google glass was introduced, it was just 'a neat idea'. Now it's a product, and therefore it's clearly more trustworthy because someone is profiting from it. (/s)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    There's a window of attention for public discourse and there's fatigue. We, as a group, can only be upset about so much. It's a tried tactic to just try to distract us with some crazy shit, like Trump did with the alien files. If one crazy thing comes up in the news, other stuff will drop from our radar. And that's why people try shit again and again and again. Always in the hope that this time people are distracted by other stuff or are finally worn down enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 106 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (13 children)

    Paywalled article. Here's the link to the app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.pocketpc.nearbyglasses

    Edit: it's licensed under a license I never heard of. I'm curious, I don't understand why it was needed.

    "Why draft new licenses? Until now, there has been no standardization of this kind of source code license, even though it has become increasingly common. This has resulted in confusing and overlapping licenses, which need to be analyzed one at a time. Lack of standardization has used up the time and resources of many in the software industry, as well as their lawyers. The objective of the PolyForm Project is standardization and reduction of costs for developers and users."

    Seems like that exact XKCD about standards.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    That license looks like Creative Commons Non-Comercial, which is not an open source license.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    This is an unpopular opinion, but using licenses to actively prevent commercial exploitation of voluntary communal labor is not a bad thing. I would even argue that allowing commercial exploitation of free, communally-maintained software is downright unethical. I don’t tolerate this pejorative “it’s not open source unless the rich and powerful can exploit it” bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Thank you, I see this so often and it always irks me.
    "oh but you're limiting your reach with this license because companies won't want to us— boo fucking hoo, maybe not everything is about market-share and having a morbillion downloads.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 95 points 6 months ago (43 children)

    You know what sucks?

    In that AR glasses, in theory, are such an interesting technology with lots of potential, and certainly a piece of tech I would love to have and work with and on. Not to secretly record people, but to, well.. augment my field of view with whatever digital tools or displays I would like. It would be so useful

    It's honestly kinda saddening to me that it most likely will get completely ruined by our current toxic relationship to technology. A step towards our ever increasing cyberdystopia, and not towards enchanting our limited lives

    Obviously either way I don't trust Meta, but an open-hardware device running a FOSS AR system? It would be nice..

    I still hold out hope that this somehow could be resolved, and I would love to contribute to open software for these devices. Maybe one day soon-ish I will. My expertise should be well applicable, after all

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    It would be incredibly useful in construction. Having a digital overlay telling you exactly where to put up the framing for a separating wall, or an overlay showing the correct distance between screws, or where wires and pipes are inside a wall? There are so incredibly many awesome possible uses for AR in construction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (8 children)

    Drop the cameras and microphones and replace them with a couple accelerometers and gyros. Paired with your phone's GPS tracking, the glasses can tell where you're looking without actually seeing anything. You can get handy features like a floating 'turn here' sign over your exit while driving with GPS navigation without recording anyone or anything at any time. Better battery life, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 51 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Open season on meta wearers when?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 50 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (18 children)

    I agree but the biggest defense for this is to always assume you're being recorded when in public even if you're not. You never know.

    The issue becomes relevant in private spaces, to me. Nobody with smart glasses is coming into my home.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 24 points 6 months ago (12 children)

    Doesn't work 😮‍💨 push "start scanning" and nothing happens.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 23 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    I know next to nothing about the glasses, but would they be vulnerable to anything the Flipper Zero is capable of doing?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 20 points 6 months ago* (9 children)

    Now you need a powerful laser pointer to ruin the glasses camera. Careful not to blind the wearer.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago

    meta is all about surveillance cant expect anything less

  • source
  • [–] [S] 19 points 6 months ago (1 child)
    [–] 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I'd fork this just to name it more appropriately: "Glasshole radar"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    I just re-watched Ghost in the Shell SAC Laughing Man last night, and wouldn't mind seeing these things get hacked with the Laughing Man logo replacing any face it was looking at, re-writing signs, etc.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    I wonder if you could run it on a dedicated piece of gear like FlockYou...

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Now if they can just notify you that some asshole is recording you on their cell phone instead of reading reddit. probably 0.001% of people out there stalking are using smart glasses.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›