1401
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @feed@404media.co

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MBech@feddit.dk 47 points 4 days ago

It would be incredibly useful in construction. Having a digital overlay telling you exactly where to put up the framing for a separating wall, or an overlay showing the correct distance between screws, or where wires and pipes are inside a wall? There are so incredibly many awesome possible uses for AR in construction.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

I always wanted to build an AR app for inside data centers. Imagine looking at a server and being able to open a terminal or desktop that you can immediately interact with on the floor. or have it display resource information like hardware utilization, temps, network throughput and configuration, etc.

it would make a difficult job just bit more manageable.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 9 points 4 days ago

I really like the special tagged tape that could bring up AR tags and details about it. Organization and directions are so more useful.

[-] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It would be so cool to have something like this integrated into your monitoring platform. Imagine being able to "tap" on a switch in a rack and be able to view it's mac table or port assignments

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure that already exists.

But it is mainly used for solving hardware problems where a technician can film whatever they are working on with their phone, and a remote technician can "draw" in AR on the image in real time to point towards the things that need manual interventions.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

I'm in the AEC industry. Almost any implementation of on site augmentation sucks ass most especially because the tech nerds making them have a really hard time truly understanding the needs OF tradespeople and installers.

Almost all of them are top down implementations meant to assess tooling and field quality rather than actually acting as an overlay aid in construction (which, like, 90% of tradespeople worth their salt don't actually need FYI).

Also, I've found, most of these tech nerds making this shit don't know how to actually put a building together and are constantly flummoxed by the methodology.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago

I've worked in construction, and now work as a CAD specialist, so I know your pain, but the problem with "how to actually put a building together" is a very wide issue, also present with engineers and architects.

[-] scala@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Sure, that creepy 48 year old on the subway is just looking for a Charmander.

[-] HobbitFoot 6 points 4 days ago

It's already used in construction as a documentation device. Photos are big as a documentation tool and some inspectors already use wearable cameras as a tool.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

ok, but they don't try and hide them do they?

[-] HobbitFoot 1 points 2 days ago

I know one engineer who bought the Meta glasses due to the form factor. For others with the Go Pro, they usually mount the cameras on their hard hat, which makes it easy to see since black hard hats are rare.

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

They are used for that kind of applications already. You put one of those on, and some technician remotely guides you in doing some maintenance while looking through your eyes. They can mark things in your fov, show you diagrams, whatever. Pretty neat actually.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Unneeded. We already have a tool for that it's called blueprints, they haven't failed in over 3000 years.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 3 days ago

Blueprints don't fail, people really really often do though. People measure wrong, or build on the wrong side of the line they've drawn. It's not a question about "Is it essential", it's a question about "Will it make it easier, faster and less errorprone".

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
1401 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
3645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS