the same democrats who have stopped.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NOTHING?
That's not true.
They stopped the budget that enabled the murders of Luis Gustavo Núñez Cáceres, Geraldo Lunas Campos, Víctor Manuel Díaz, Parady La, Renee Nicole Good, Luis Beltrán Yáñez–Cruz, Heber Sánchez Domínguez and Alex Pretti. From not NOT passing.
Just like they 'didn't let' the GOP cut Medicare benefits by caving during the last shutdown? Oh wait...
A strongly worded letter?
Weeks later after a bunch of headlines and sound bites… “Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer has agreed to Trump’s federal take over of mid term elections. In return republicans have agreed to pinky promise that the election will be fair and to walk by a room that has the latest proposal on extending ACA benefits.”
Soooooo go on MSNBC and say "Hell no" and "over my dead body!"
And then Jon Stewart smash-cuts to a report revealing you actually voted "Yes"? Like always happens? Cool great awesome


Put schumer in a nursing home.
Send his ass to Israel since he loves it so much. Never seen him more animated than when he's on his knees for em.
Well, that confirms Trump is going to successfully nationalize the midterms.
(To be clear: we need to fight this every step of the way...)


Haha! Yeah, sure.
Just like they stopped the child rapist from doing all that other criminally evil shit last week/month/year?
Hey, Dems, you should really try to keep your controlled opposition performance at least somewhat believable. If you guys try to overstep your boundaries daddy tRUMP will bitch slap you.

Schumer is typing up that stern letter as we speak
That decrepit, useless old bastard needs to be put out to pasture.
The party will replace him with someone that protects the status quo like he does, the exact same way they did in the House by replacing Pelosi with a black Pelosi.
I know, but that won't stop me from bitching about it.
Okay. So Democrats calling for a general work and tax strike until Donald Trump and his Cabinet step down. then?
Nationalizing the US elections would require amending the Constitution to take that power back from the States, which would require a Constitutional Convention, which would require either a 2/3 majority vote in the House AND Senate OR a call for a convention by 2/3rds of the State legislatures.
None of those dingbats are willing to waste that much time and effort just to shoot themselves in the ass. And Trump can't just "Hereby Doo Dee-clare" it.
Believe it when I see it.
has anyone checked to see if Jeffries is an actual player and not a bot account?
If Trump tosses the Democrats out of Congress, Democrat congresspeople won't be able to collect their bribe money. They have a strong financial motive to stop Trump here.
I hate that this is true...
Doubt it
Last week, Trump called on Republicans to “take over the election in at least fifteen spots” and “nationalize” the ballot box. Trump is accusing specific Democratic cities of corruption, such as Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta.
“Trump is already trying to cast doubt on the states’ ability to organize elections and count votes fairly,” says Elaine Kamarck. She was involved in campaigns by Democratic presidential candidates and is now affiliated with the Brookings Institute, a think tank.
Under the constitution, the states are responsible for organizing elections and counting the votes. “When the constitution was drafted, the states were very powerful,” explains Kamarck. “They didn’t want a strong central government. That is still a key feature of the U.S. state system.”
White House spokesman Karoline Leavitt nuanced Trump’s statements. According to her, the president wants Congress to set new rules. Parliament has the power to do so.
Trump later reiterated that the federal government must intervene in what he calls “serious corruption.” “If a state can’t organize elections, then the people who stand behind me have to do something about that,” he said.
In March, Trump tried to impose rules through a presidential decree states. Federal judges then ruled that only Congress, and not the president, is competent to establish nationwide election rules.
The president still states without evidence that the 2020 election has not been fair. Last week, the FBI seized ballots and electoral rolls from that period in Fulton County, in the state of Georgia. Trump then spoke by phone with agents involved in the action. This was done via the telephone of Tulsi Gabbard, who, as director of national intelligence (DNI), directs all national intelligence services.
The fact that the DNI is present in a police action is highly unusual. Gabbard writes in a letter to Congress that Trump personally ordered her.
“It’s unheard of, the Trump administration has nothing to do there,” says Elaine Kamarck. “I expect the president will try to show that there was something wrong with the ballots.”
From Dutch state News NOS
My bet is Trump will have ICE surround the voting spots and will make them do something if it turns out he lost, lol.
Okay...fuckin prove it.
Thats a relief
Better arm the fuck up
Especially since ICE will be "monitoring" swing districts.
I feel like I've heard him say those words before, but I don't remember seeing him follow through on them... strange...
Bet
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News