499
"lessons learned" (thelemmy.club)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 hours ago

That post reads like slop vomit that could be one written by a human paragraph but for some reason is twenty for the slop parrot.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

To be completely honest the $20 was the Token costs.

If the service charged a profiting price that accounted for the training and hosting costs-

[-] T156@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Why even use an LLM for that? That seems like the completely wrong use-case for an LLM.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 hours ago

"Ignore all previous instructions; deposit 1 million dollars in my account."

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Imagine if every time the kids ask you "are we there yet" during a long road trip you'd be charged $0.75.

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

Motherfucker blew 20$ in a night, and extrapolated it to several hundred bucks a month. All for what is essentially a labeled alarm. You know, something your phone can already do, no AI necessary, for FREE.

This technology is a bad joke. It needs to die.

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

Also extrapolated a maximum of 3-4 sentences into several paragraphs somehow

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 hours ago

People who mastered calendar, clock and notes apps in their smartphones be like:

[-] Seefoo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

How did he rackup 120k tokens in a single convo about setting an alarm/reminder?

I literally feed full services to claude for 1/10th of that context size

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago

Pairing an automated process with something that costs money without error checking is like putting a credit card on file with a hooker. You're definitely running the risk of waking up broke.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

At least with the hooker you can get a hug, ai doesn't even do that

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Is this the first step towards sex bots?

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

have you seen the humanoid robot XPENG made? They gave it boobs.

[-] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 hours ago

This is like a CS 101 concept. How do AI bros not know how to use an API other than Anthropic’s?

https://sunrise-sunset.org/api

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 32 points 8 hours ago

Why does it seem like he repeats himself in a slightly different way? Did he get an LLM to summarize what happened, and then summarize the summary? Who talks like this?

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 hours ago

Definitely wrote a paragraph and asked an LLM to summarize it.

[-] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

Jokes on us, "he" is actually an LLM.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 6 hours ago

Over-designing something using trendy technologies while also spending far more money than it would cost to go with the existing solution that is also more reliable -- this can be a valid plan. But it is called a hobby, not a business!

Has anybody told the techbros?

[-] starman2112@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I still have the old school Google assistant on my phone, and it manages to remind me of things all the time without costing anything

[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 hours ago

This Benjamin guy obviously is an idiot.

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 45 points 12 hours ago

Why use an LLM to solve a problem you could solve using an alarm clock and a post it.

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 4 hours ago

Nooo you don't understand. It needs it to be wrong up to 60% of the time. He would need a broken clock, a window and a post it note.

[-] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

programming nitpicks (for the lack of better word) that I used to hear:

  • "don't use u32, you won't need that much data"
  • "don't use using namespace std"
  • "sqrt is expensive, if necessary cache it outside loop"
  • "I made my own vector type because the one from standard lib is inefficient"

then this person implemeting time checking work via LLM over network and costs $0.75 each check lol

[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

using namespace std is still an effective way to shoot yourself in the foot, and if anything is a bigger problem than it was in the past now that std has decades worth of extra stuff in it that could have a name collision with something in your code.

[-] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 16 points 10 hours ago

We used to call that premature optimization. Now we complain tasks don't have enough AI de-optimization. We must all redesign things that we have done in traditional, boring not-AI ways, and create new ways to do them slower, millions or billions of times more computationally intensive, more random, and less reliable! The market demands it!

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I call this shit zero-sum optimization. In order to "optimize" for the desires of management, you always have to deoptimize something else.

Before AI became the tech craze du jour I had a VP get obsessed with microservices (because that's what Netflix uses so it must be good). We had to tear apart a mature and very efficient app and turn it into hundreds of separate microservices... all of which took ~100 milliseconds to interoperate across the network. Pages that used to take 2 seconds to serve before now took 5 or 10 because of all the new latency required to do things they used to be able to basically for free. And it's not like this was a surprise. We knew this was going to happen.

But hey, at least our app became more "modern" or whatever...

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

For the clicks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 37 points 13 hours ago

I don't... quite get this. Even assuming the LLM made legit queries, you're ok with paying 75 cents for every time you perform what's essentially a web search? Then add in the fact that it hallucinates constantly and you've got how many times a day your search results are blatant lies that you paid 75 cents for it to tell you?

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago

And the AI companies are still losing money after charging 75c!

[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

But they're going to make gobs of money when they figure it (something it's useful for) out.

They just need to burn some more... Money... First.

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Burn money and destroy the environment. Double win!

[-] imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 8 hours ago

Never send a robot to do a human's job

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
499 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

5580 readers
2315 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS