376

Dilara was on her lunch break in the London store where she works when a tall man walked up to her and said: "I swear red hair means you've just been heartbroken."

The man continued the conversation as they both got in a lift, and he asked Dilara for her phone number.

What Dilara did not realise was that the man was secretly filming her on his smart glasses - which look like normal eyewear but have a tiny camera which can record video.

The footage was then posted to TikTok, where it received 1.3m views. "I just wanted to cry," Dilara, 21, told the BBC.

The man who filmed her, it turned out, had posted dozens of secretly filmed videos to TikTok, giving men tips on how to approach women.

Dilara also found out that her phone number was visible in the video. She then faced a wave of messages and calls.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 125 points 1 month ago

Fuck TikTok. And fuck smart glasses. What the fuck is wrong with people who would even design glasses with a hidden camera?

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago

Fuck the assholes who would do this.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Absolutely. I cannot believe such a creepy product would be made to begin with though.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Glassholes are making a comeback, fuck.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 21 points 1 month ago

They're desperate to get data about human activity. They wanted data about what people do online and they've got all of that. Now they need to move into the human world as much as possible. It used to be just for selling to advertisers, but now they also need to feed it into AI.

They already try to force these into every area of our lives..... all phone data, all online content, dating apps, phone keyboards, browser fingerprinting, internet connected fridges, cars, door bells, home cameras, etc etc. Now they will try to find new and novel ways to put more data collection devices (camera, mic, GPS, gryo and movement trackers, any physical parameter they can think of, etc etc) into more insane devices.

They will push "smart" clothes, wearable AI devices, furniture, toilet, etc etc. They will say these are absolutely essential and add value to our lives. People will eat this up immediately and fall over themselves to incorporate these into their lives and celebrate how amazing this is.

It started with the initial days of Facebook when I didn't want to be on Facebook, but people I know would still upload my pictures and tag them with my name. They need more and more ways to get information on people not in their ecosystem. This shit will only get more and more invasive.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

And then they'll call anyone who thinks "smart" devices are stupid a luddite...

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Billionaires are the mistake.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Both can be solved with a daneaxe.

[-] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They're being built into earbuds and headphones now too. Let me see if I can find links to the products again, saw them while browsing articles about CES

Edit: https://www.soundguys.com/razer-project-motoko-ai-headphones-150707/

The headphones were real, the earbuds were just a concept image though

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Jesus. Black Mirror is all coming true.

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

That woman who smashed an idiot's glasses in New York a few weeks/months? ago was ahead of the curve.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

It's all good until she breaks someone's plain old real prescription glasses thinking they are smart glasses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

This dude deserves nothing less that an ass beating then criminal charges.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Criminal justice system: Best I can do is a 300$ fine and 60 hours community service.

[-] Decq@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm fully ok with punching these people in the face and break their glasses. If their nose gets broken in the process, that's just something we have to live with.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mjr@infosec.pub 25 points 1 month ago

And now TikTok is advertising itself on UK TV as an educational tool. I expect everyone on here recognises them as evil already, so don't doubt it!

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Until there's a law against it, a law that requires an obvious flashing red light, this will continue to happen. I know the Meta glasses have a light that supposedly can't be covered without covering the camera. But, that's there only because Meta chose to put it there to head off complaints, à la Google Glass.

But, I think those lights will go away, and I believe that is what the billionaires who make the choices want to happen. Because, being in public, not knowing whether you're being filmed is a great way to keep the masses in line. Fear and division in the populous is how those in power stay in power, when the people want them out.

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

I don't have a link right offhand, but the indicator led is defeatable. There's people on ebay offering the modded glasses for only (iirc) like $100 more than msrp.

[-] potatogamer@ttrpg.network 2 points 4 weeks ago

How exactly should a law like this work? Should it be obvious to anyone being recorded in public that they are being recorded and who is doing it?

That wouldn't be very beneficial to the surveillance state.

[-] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago

This glasses should not be allowed. We need clear indicators of recording not that tiny light meta added.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

I think we're reaching the point where "anti smart glasses" glasses should become a thing, that is, a type of electronic glasses that can detect whether the person you're talking to is wearing smart glasses and warn you about it.

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

I want a device that makes it explode on their face and melt their eyes.

[-] fort_burp@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Israel can probably make you one of those.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Better would be glasses (or some other device) that would selectively disable smart glasses. Extra points if the device causes the glasses to catch fire.

[-] scholar@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Infrared leds should be able to overexpose the cameras unless they have IR filters in them.

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 5 points 1 month ago

God i hate the idea that you have to wear glasses just because other people are total cunts.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 month ago

This is so fucked up, and the guy who did this needs to be doxxed and have his whole life made hell, but...

Back when the ubiquitousness of smartphone cameras was still fairly new, and the prospect of being secretly recorded and posted online at any given moment was still unthinkable yet real, I tried raising the concern whenever/however I could.

Like, I would tell people "this is fucked up, and we shouldn't normalize this." And you know what they told me, nearly without fail? They called me a creep and said if I wasn't doing anything I wouldn't want people to see online, then I wouldn't be worried about being secretly recorded.

It was like this pseudo "women's empowerment" sentiment where they thought this gives them the ability to ruin men's lives (often over short clips out of context that only look bad based on how it's spinned in the caption), thus "protecting" women, and they didn't think it would ever turn back on them and blow up in their faces.

Unbeknownst to them, one of my main concerns was the danger this poses for women. But of course, no one would believe that, because I was a man, so of course the only reasonable assumption was that I was a misogynist and only concerned with privacy so I could get away with predatory behavior. So of course, if I raise a fuss about this then I must be a creep. Of course.

Well, look what's come home to roost. Amazing. Who could have predicted this?

[-] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

The 'if you not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to hide' argument is a logical fallicy.
Any time someone throws that at you ask them why they have curtains/blinds on their windows, doors on their rooms and fences around their house.

[-] scholar@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

The problem isn't the recording, this was in a public place where there is no expectation of privacy, the problem is covert recording.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago

Exactly. But fascists want privacy for themselves, and if they don't get it then they'll call people commies. But if anyone else wants privacy, then fascists say they're acting suspicious and must be guilty of something.

Make it make sense. (Yes I know, conservatives are self-contradictory and have no ideological consistency; rules for me not for thee, we get it...)

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

They post dudes from the gym just trying to work out to shame them for attention and it's all fine because 'safety' but if they get posted or recorded it's suddenly an issue. Women's empowerment has always been hypocritical and self-serving.

The average consumer is stupid as a bag of rocks and care more about doing what they feel like doing than doing what is wise. They've helped build a consumer product surveillance state and will never admit any fault for it, even when ICE now uses it to gestapo them. They shamed anyone that dared suggest maybe don't invite tracking and surveillance technology into every inch of OUR lives, or posting everyone's shit on Facebook all day. Fuck these ppl for helping usher in the techbro fascist dictatorship we're now suffering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

She didn't deserve that, and these glasses are so problematic. Too problematic for society, just like so much of the AI products being introduced.

Yes some of the glasses are supposed to have lights, but if you search online you can find plenty of ways to cover or conceal them.

Also myself and my significant other wear prescription glasses that have a similar shape to these. At what point do we have to start being anxious about people starting to slug anyone wearing glasses out of paranoid concerns for their privacy?

I don't want to deal with any of this. We live in such a dystopian world.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 weeks ago

Do these stupid companies actually think that any of these products aren't just going to be used by perverts?

There are legitimate professional use cases: for example, imagine a consulting doctor looking in on what another surgeon is doing and offering opinions as the operation goes on. Or same thing with engineers.

But I can't think of a single consumer use case that isn't designed for perverts.

[-] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 4 weeks ago

I'm 90% on-board with disliking these, but I can see uses for 'Augmented Reality' glasses. I just wish they worked the way they do in Sci-fi and video games.

Lots of interactions we have on our phones could be done hands-free on a HUD

automatic translation of text or voice when traveling navigation/directions and similar guidance, like automatic subway/train maps instant access to biometric data trends like heart rate, glucose levels and more

I've also been part of a pilot to get a HUD to provide AR data to a manufacturing operator, showing things like line speed, temperature and other kinds of data they would otherwise have to go to a computer for. This was around the google glass era, though, and the devices were too pricey to justify and the tech wasn't there yet.

I do think these devices need to be more obvious. We called them glassholes when google was starting this wearable computing trend and people were using them inappropriately; and we've seen how any internet-connected camera like Ring and Flock can be abused.

The concept of the personal HUD is useful, but it still needs workshopping to make it socially safe. Also, the ones like the Meta/Rayban glasses are just pervert tools. No AR, just a camera has no value other than creeping.

[-] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

Even if these companies try to create a technology with the express concern to make its use ethical, clean, safe, private, and pragmatically useful, perverts will still manage to gunk it up with pervert slime.

Not holding out much hope on either of these things right now. Maybe we'll end up in the star trek universe somehow.

[-] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Straight up, that guy needs his knees bent the wrong way - no way in Hell is he too stupid to not understand that he was putting her in genuine danger by splashing her digits and face online.

I can still remember years ago when the prototype 'smart glasses' (see image below), or whatever they were called, were new. Some fucker tried to pull off a demo in a small community pub, but someone noticed his gigantic weird frames and caught on. MFer got bum-rushed out the front door under threat of a serious ass-kicking, and anyone who's seen a crowd of pub regulars work someone over knows what I mean. They should be too scared to pull this shit on women.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
376 points (99.7% liked)

World News

54101 readers
3258 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS