News

The issue with institutionalization (besides SCOTUS ruling it violates the ADA in 1999’s Olmstead v LC, rendering it illegal for anyone with a disability), is that it’s expensive. That’s why Reagan defunded them all.

To be clear, deinstutionalization was a good idea, but unlike JFK’s push, Reagan pushed for it without replacing institutions with well-funded community services. Which would be cheaper than institutions, most of which sit unoccupied and decaying, so there’s also the question of where Trump wants to put these people.

Republicans made a deal with JFK to phase out mental health hospitals and replace them with community based facilities that had a more home like atmosphere.

They did the gutting part.

Then JFK was assassinated.

Republicans decided that they didn't have to do any more after that, and LBJ used most of his political capital to get the voting rights act passed.

That's why our mental health system is so broken.

If republicans wanted to fix the system, they could start with funding the VA. Many of our troops wind up with mental health conditions due to their time in the service.

Driving the news: "When I am back in the White House, we will use every tool, lever, and authority to get the homeless off our streets," Trump said in a video posted on his campaign site in August, saying that he'll work with states to ban urban camping.

• Trump said his administration would offer treatment and other resources for people who are "just temporarily down on their luck" or have less severe mental health issues.
• "And for those who are severely mentally ill and deeply disturbed, we will bring them back to mental institutions, where they belong," he said, "with the goal of reintegrating them back into society once they are well enough to manage."

So "every tool, lever, and authority" except building shelters and affordable housing. Because, of course, the homeless themselves are the problem that needs to be fixed, not a symptom of a society that needs to be fixed.

A Democrat proposes a way to help the mentally ill: HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR IT?

A Republican proposes a more expensive way to punish the mentally ill: NOW THIS IS GOOD POLICY

Yesterday, browsing wikipedia, stumbled on articles that talked about this very thing, on how Russia took advantage of mental health systems. They started to classify nonconforming, rebels as mentally ill. A frequently used diagnosis was sluggish schizophrenia. Anyone who was socially awkward, thought differently got this diagnosis. Cuz if someone is questioning our government, they must be sick in the head

They used this heavily for decades to discredit political rivals, forcible confinement, lock them away, work camps. Think gulag archipelago.

I agree that we should take care of our mentally disabled instead of letting them roam the streets.

I do not think that's what cheetoman would do with those institutions.

This is how it begins. Trump and his idiot sidekick fascist moron Mike Johnson will try to do a 1939 round 2 against all the gays, transgenders, stoners and while they're at it the jews again because fuck people.

He belongs in one, that's for sure.

That's a bit ironic, given that he should be committed to one himself.

we will bring them back to mental institutions, where they belong

As someone that struggles with mental issues, and has spent some time in a facility when I was at my worst, this line pisses me off to no end. Feels no different than what he would say about so-called criminals or immigrants. Wish he would go where he belongs.

But, that's SoCiaLiSM!

I get it, mental institutions are responsible for some of the most egregious human rights violations of the 20th century.

But that's an argument to REFORM those institutions, not ELIMINATE them.

We should learn from the lessons of the past and, at the same time, make sure people get the mental health care they need.

If they can be successfully treated and released? Fantastic. If they need to be held for the rest of their lives? It's better than allowing them to roam the streets posing a danger to themselves and others.

We see it in Portland ALL THE TIME.

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/crime/portland-psychiatric-facility-unity-center-behavioral-health-lawsuit-attack/283-81de7a64-3a80-4b3d-8968-53b10f9a1d95

https://www.koin.com/local/washington-county/tigard-police-patient-assaults-ambulance-crew-on-mental-health-call/

https://katu.com/news/local/hatchet-attack-in-portland-a-sign-of-a-bigger-problem-mental-health-advocate-says

I’m sure he’d love to revive the tradition of putting “troublesome” women into them.

For himself?

One of Ronald Reagan's gifts to California was a homelessness problem. He closed down the state's asylums and never built the community based netowrk that was supposed to care for the mentally ill. The homeless caused an increse in petty crimes, which meant you needed more police and jails.

It worked so well he took it national when he was elected President.

Why should he get to pick his prison? Just assign him to one and move along.

It's very American to struggle greatly and fail to solve issues other countries don't have.

Only if we can stick Malignant Narcissists in there.

Next prison ships

Careful what you wish for Donnie...