top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 275 points 7 months ago (20 children)

They aren't struggling with comprehension, they are being deliberate about misrepresenting the facts.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago* (10 children)

    Yeah, this. They don’t want to know facts. They are actively resisting reality. Doesn’t matter that ~40 people per million per two doses had adverse effects to the vaccine and most likely recovered just fine while hundreds of thousands got sick and died from the disease and who knows how many survived because they were vaccinated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    This is a hobby with flat Earthers, MAGA, and antivaxxers. They make weird shit up and then pretend to believe it. Numerology. Conspiracy theories. They dont think there is any harm in it and like to troll "the libs" and debate them to waste everyone's time. The bad thing is that you get a portion of them that start truly believing these tales ... we have a few dozen holding US offices now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 148 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    The sub's mods deleted the comment too. I see it's every bit as much of a cesspool as it always was over there

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You know the paradox of tolerance? The idea that if you believe in tolerance, then you have to be intolerant of intolerance.

    I think this general concept is applicable in many areas. Like, it makes sense to be nonviolent except in preventing more violence.

    And in this case, we should all make a giant conspiracy to destroy the places where conspiracy theorists talk to each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    The paradox disappears the moment, you handle tolerance differently.

    Handle it like a social contract that everyone is automatically part of. All are tolerated until they stop tolerating people who are also part of the contract.

    Whoever stops tolerating people who are part of the contract loses their "being tolerated privileges".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 7 months ago

    Top 1% poster and a top 1% commenter. Reminds me of the quote: "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes"

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    I made a post recently, wondering what we could do to get a larger userbase on lemmy. Many people kept saying "why larger? This size is good", even though I stated my reason for wanting a larger userbase in the OP.

    This post, right here, also shows a benefit of having a larger userbase and something I miss from reddit: actual research scientists coming to the comments explaining the paper and whatnot. I think decreasing the distance from research scientists to the general public is a good idea. And I want them on lemmy. I would love for lemmy to be a little bit less memes and a little bit more... Serious.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    But a larger community also means people like that conspiracy poster coming here and degrading the quality of the conversation. It's a double edged sword. I think we should encourage quality user growth over just quantity. Of course, that's easier said than done. But my point is that growth in and of itself is a poor measure of success: we want growth of competent users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    Funny, but probably not very fitting to this case, as luckily non of the children in the study pool died:

    Across all analyses, there were no COVID-19-related deaths, and fewer than seven COVID-19-related critical care admissions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (9 children)
    • Not a meme
    • Not a microblog
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    Here is the study under discussion:
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40985520/

    And here is the reddit comment thread:
    https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1qdxa5z/17_million_children_were_studied_the_results/

    And just in case anyone wants it - not that there is much value in it - here is the link that was posted on reddit:
    https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status/2011141377095246302

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Why hidde the usernames? It proven the if someone wants to find it, they will.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    If one person wants to find it there's no problem. It's when a whole bunch of people all think they've been given license to brigade a thread and start cyberbullying someone that things get unpleasant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago

    Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    I was in the hospital with myocarditis after recieving the first shot. Got better after a long recovery. Got the second and third shot as soon as I could. A little hospital times seems worth it when the alternative is permanent brain, lung and heart damage.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Why are dates removed… to make sure this can still be posted in 2056…

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    And in general myocarditis in children many cases resolve completely all on its own

    https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/health/m/myocarditis

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    It's a top 1% poster too, so you can be sure that entire sub reddit is overflowing with bullshit theories made up by the feeble, unable to understand what they're looking at

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    1.7 million children were studied.

    No they weren't. This is statistics.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    I think this could also be generalized into something like "Conservative struggles with colors other than black, white"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    i had covid-19 recently , in sept the extremely painful sore throat, i believe it partially triggered my background atopic dermatitis an early flareup.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I read myocarditis as my comida at first and got really confused as to why fictional mushroom people were being referenced in a study

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›