527
Ruel (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] lime@feddit.nu 182 points 1 month ago

don't vandalize wikipedia :( editors work very hard for no pay

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 205 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can confirm as a longtime editor that:

  1. I find this shit funny as hell in the short term, but

  2. It does make our work harder.

  3. If you really need to take a screenshot for the meme, please at least just use the VisualEditor, which is a what-you-see-is-what-you-get (WYSIWYG) editor that will allow for a near-identical screenshot without actually publishing. If it's not perfectly identical, you can go to the source editor and click 'Preview', which will actually render an identical page without publishing.

  4. We really do take neutrality seriously – not primarily for our image but because, empirically, not doing that destroys the quality of the project.

[-] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 1 month ago

Alternatively you can also right click, press Inspect, and then edit the HTML, which will look perfect and also not actually change anything.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago

right click? what is this the stone age

  f12
[-] morto@piefed.social 33 points 1 month ago

the right click method goes directly into the selected elements

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

I always favored ctrl-shift-i.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Inspect will be fine for basic text edits, but it'll get annoying compared to the VE or source editor if you're adding a lot of text or trying to do something semi-elaborate.

On the other hand, Inspect will work where the editor won't if the article is protected and you lack access.

[-] Phantaminum@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago

I just want to say, thank you for your efforts!

[-] waigl@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

you really need to take a screenshot for the meme, please at least just use the VisualEditor, which is a what-you-see-is-what-you-get (WYSIWYG) editor that will allow for a near-identical screenshot without actually publishing. If it’s not perfectly identical, you can go to the source editor and click ‘Preview’, which will actually render an identical page without publishing.

Or just press F12 and edit stuff right there.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

And it only further emboldens the idiots who think that Wikipedia is biased (largely against conservatives).

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia is biased against conservatives. Wikipedia requires citations.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago

Reality has a well-known liberal bias

[-] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia is biased. In favour of white western men.

But it's important to remember that there are projects working to correct all three of those, and you can help.

[-] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It might also be an HTML edit or something

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 month ago

yeah i hope

[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Not vandalism if it's a verified fact

[-] lime@feddit.nu 11 points 1 month ago

it's not a verified fact if it doesn't have a citation

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

What a time to find myself wishing there was a hell.

[-] iamdisappoint@reddthat.com 28 points 1 month ago
[-] lena@gregtech.eu 19 points 1 month ago

Vandalizing Wikipedia is for the weak

[-] Slashme@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

As a massive Wikipedia fan and a longtime editor, the comments in this post make me very happy. You're my people, Lemmy!

[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 16 points 1 month ago

Only losers vandalize public good

That said: fuck you, Scott. rot in piss, bigot.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

is it vandalism when it is true?

[-] Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

I only ever knew the cartoonist for Dilbert. What did he do that's got folks hating on him? Were there some messed up comics that he published?

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's been on the clearly wrong side of bad takes numerous times at this point.

2006: "were the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust exaggerated?"

2010s: racist shit about black people

2019 on: anti-masking drivel

2020: stop the steal

2023: livestream, a poll says 25% of black/brown folks feel a bit weird about if someone were to say "it's ok to be white", Scott says "best advice I can give to white ppl, get the hell away from black people, there's no fixing this."

Almost every newspaper was already close to breaking, they all basically drop him and syndication cancelled.

Me: Healthy, alive, & pointing and laughing at his dead, dumb ass.

[-] Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Yuck! Thanks for sharing, it's good to know these things

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The cartoonist for Dilbert was kind of fun, then he started to be kind of weird, then he became really odd, then he turned into a total weirdo, then he died. The end.

[-] Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Short and to the point explanation. Nice!

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

What a way to discover this dickhead finally kicked the bucket 😌

2026 off to a good start. Let's keep the ball rolling on shitty evil people dying.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

The obituary I'm looking for will be on the front page.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

I have never wished for a man's death, but I have read certain obituaries with great pleasure.

Ah, who am I kidding? I've wished for a lot of deaths. They'll all come true, eventually.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Hey, a fair number of them get paid to vandalise it.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
527 points (96.0% liked)

196

5834 readers
2060 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS