183
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Problem-posing education does not and cannot serve the interests of the oppressor. No oppressive order could permit the oppressed to begin to question: Why?

Indeed, the interests of the oppressors lie in “changing the consciousness of the oppressed, not the situation which oppresses them”; for the more the oppressed can be led to adapt to that situation, the more easily they can be dominated.

Implicit in the banking concept [of education] is the assumption of a dichotomy between human beings and the world: a person is merely in the world, not with the world or with others…In this view, the person is not a conscious being (corpo consciente); he or she is rather the possessor of a consciousness: an empty “mind” passively open to the reception of deposits of reality from the world outside.

https://envs.ucsc.edu/internships/internship-readings/freire-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed.pdf

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago

I've never heard an argument for anti-natalism that wasn't just an extremist expression of individualism brainrot.

Children are the future. We build socialism now so that they can enjoy communism in their lifetimes.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 2 years ago

I've always found "it is selfish to have children" dogmatic talk to be a sort of projection. projection

Not everyone must, but if no one does, there is no future.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

I would say in the current world not “it’s selfish to have children” but “it’s cruel to your future children to bring them into this world”

Idk if you’ve noticed this but the planet’s on fire and the people capable of fixing that are instead trying their hardest to ensure nothing is ever done about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

There's a difference between valuing kids as actual human beings, and wanting to bring more people into this world of suffering.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago

I personally really have problems with the "world of suffering" argument because my grandparents were born born while China was being invaded by Japan after years of civil war, and my parents were born during the Great Chinese Famine.

They all had or have had more than their fair share of suffering but never once did I hear them regret their lives.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just another misanthropic reddit edge lord. Don't mind them.

I didn't know lyrics were copyrighted. There are many sites that already release lyrics for songs without AI.

Got a real brain genius over here

"I didn't know lyrics were copyrighted."

I just... What?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

I guess that’s something that comes with the severe depression. I already regret my own life half the time and I’ve been relatively privileged. If my life had sucked more for material reasons my parents obviously knew about I’d be pissed at them.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Voluntary extinction is abdicating our responsibility to undo the suffering we brought on this world and the suffering that would likely only get worse if we just all snapped out of existence.

Anti-natalism is reactionary no matter how you try to spin it.

This is a problem we created and a problem we have a responsibility to address no matter how many generations it takes.

We have already set the apocalypse into motion. To bow out now is cowardice.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

and the suffering that would likely only get worse if we just all snapped out of existence.

Suffering for who?

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

All the shit we have dumped into the environment, the shit we would leave behind in the form of decaying factories and mines and oil rigs.

It is our responsibility to do something about that. It is still going to exist. All the forever chemicals. We can't just opt out and walk into oblivion with a clear conscience. That is the coward's way out.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 years ago

I have a somewhat tortured relationship with Freire as a teacher.

I think it's important theory, and really helpful for thinking about what education might look like under socialism. However, it's also big in "progressive" education circles (I first encountered it in my Masters program), and they are totally unwilling to grapple with the contradictions of what it means to practice a "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" while teaching under capitalism. Friere was writing about education in a revolutionary context and that's not easily separable from the theory. Very annoying to watch a bunch of libs fail to understand this in real time and be like "Wow, maybe we can have some more student-led discussions!"

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

That seems like entirely a problem with the reception of the work and not the work itself. Have you tried explaining to these teachers that he very explicitly means something more radical than the practices of some hippy liberal arts college?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Have you ever tried explaining something to a liberal?

But yeah this is not a criticism of the work itself

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think it's very significant that the dense core of Reddit's userbase hates children so much.

They do not want revolutions or positive change that improves society even somewhat. They want to persist as high as they can manage in the status quo, while hoarding toys.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

If antinatalists were sincere you would not be hearing from them owing to their permanent inability to post. Or do anything.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

owing to their permanent inability to post. Or do anything.

I'm not sure I'm following what you mean by that.

Lots of affluent and probably-single people around my current locale sincerely despise children and give them dirty looks just for existing in public, especially on roads at school crossings. I got to make eye contact with lots of them when volunteering as a crossing guard before and daring to slow down their commute slightly.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

I mean that they coat their mundane hatred of children in philosophical dress-up about how life itself is suffering.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

They do, they do.

No wonder so many of them want to escape into some ostensibly-better "simulation" promised by some nerd-rapture in the future and/or see the lived reality around them as some "simulation" already as an excuse to dehumanize other people and living things as "NPCs."

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

Western adults when I talk about communism: “but humans greedy Stalin giant spoon.”

Western kids when I talk about communism: “sounds cool sign me up.”

Leftists arguing with each other on the internet: “you’re so childish!”

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago

I will never have sex, you will not deceive me with your lies

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago

Yeah hating on kids per se is deffo reactionary. Unfortunately capitalism also produces conditions where the raising and education of kids is often extremely tiring, frustrating and unrewarding, and where you do not have the resources to deal with behavioral issues, above all if you are a worker who works with children, such as teachers.

Honestly though having taught mostly working-class kids I was shook when I then taught more bougie kids. There are obviously a bunch of behavioral problems in poorer schools for obvious reasons and I can sympathize as I was once one of those disrespectful working class kids whose environment was definitely not helping my behavior. But the disrespect and poor behavior is more disgusting from the bougie kids honestly. Like I really trip watching bougie kids being clearly shaped in shitty bourgeois people and knowing that it's not their fault but that there's also not much you can do.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

you do not have the resources to deal with behavioral issues, above all if you are a worker who works with children, such as teachers.

I know a handful of teachers, and they almost universally acknowledge that the problem with education is the insane bureaucracy. Standardized tests do nothing but ramp up anxiety for everyone involved. Administrators are constantly in CYA mode, as they off-load the actual labor of administration onto the lowest paid workers. VPs just run cover for the admins and exist to gaslight teachers and parents alike. Teachers are horrifically overworked and underpaid. Parents are constantly kept in the dark, except to hear how awful their children are and how every new draconian punishment is a singular remedy to keep their wretched spawn from becoming morality tales for the next line of parents.

The absolute last people at fault for all this shit are the kids. They've been commoditized and they are doing all that they can to struggle against that commoditization.

Like I really trip watching bougie kids being clearly shaped in shitty bourgeois people and knowing that it's not their fault but that there's also not much you can do.

I grew up in a wealthy Houston suburb. Had a science teacher in 6th grade - back in the 90s - who was the gold standard for middle-school educators. He had us doing real chemistry in a lab setting. He kept a menagerie of small animals in the class (mostly lizards and rodents) for us to inspect (and periodically play with). He was generous with extra credit, took deep dives into every subject, and made that class the highlight of my day.

He was also a loosely closeted gay man.

When one of the kids in a class started getting bad grades, he decided the solution was to blackmail the teacher by threatening to claim sexual harassment if his grades didn't improve. The teacher refused, and so the kid's parents filed a complaint. Guy was out of that school before the semester was over.

He got replaced with a woman straight out of college who had no teaching experience and mostly just played old 80s science videos for the class. The exams were a joke and everyone got easy As in a grade where As don't functionally matter. We didn't do anything fun or exciting or learn anything particularly useful in that second semester. Shit sucked.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

you hit the nail on the head. the job of a teacher is largely predicated on enforcing the behavioral norms of capitalism. my spouse just wants to teach kids math, not have to cop the ones who's material conditions make sitting in school for 8 hours a day a psychologically intractable reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wish I still taught my section 8 housing students. But I jumped districts and now teach in the burbs. I do not want to spend another second explaining to Tanner’s mom that, no, he cannot just call other students gay because they don’t have Teslas.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Christ alive yh the extension of the entitlement of bougie kids to their parents is actually really the thing that get's to me.

I remember telling one kid who'd just spent the class spouting insane misogynistic shit that it was unacceptable and that i'd be discussing it with his parents, and he told me he didn't care because he was getting picked up by his maid.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

It's reactionary in every configuration I've seen.

"They're going to suffer" is supremely individualistic, and by extension blames the oppressed more than the oppressor because the oppressor's children won't be the ones suffering

"Too many people" in the absence of a world order that responds to need is misanthropic Malthusian nonsense. It implies that our elite is somehow innate to humanity, once again blaming the powerless and excusing the people and system responsible for ecological devastation

And "I just don't like them, they're annoying and they don't know anything" is just depressingly small-minded and nihilistic

Kids good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

yeah but when you're sensitive to sound anyway being around (loud) kids can literally be torture. but that's my problem, not the kids

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

I'm a teacher, though for older (late high school) kids. I don't have any kids of my own, don't plan to, and don't particularly like being around them when I'm not at work. I really enjoy my job, but it is a job. Kids are exhausting, and while I don't hate them, I do find it kind of puzzling why people want to have their own. I also think that it's at least a little morally questionable to bring new people into the world considering what their lives are likely to be like over the next century or so. I'm not really an anti-natalist, but I think I would feel bad about consigning a human being to living through what we have every reason to think is going to be a very rough time, and I don't think that's a reactionary viewpoint. I do think we have a strong responsibility to do the absolute best we can for the kids that are here, and (as I said) I really like my job. I just also like being able to go home in the evening and not keep dealing with kids.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

I also think that it's at least a little morally questionable to bring new people into the world considering what their lives are likely to be like over the next century or so. I'm not really an anti-natalist, but I think I would feel bad about consigning a human being to living through what we have every reason to think is going to be a very rough time, and I don't think that's a reactionary viewpoint.

You can decide to not have kids, that's fine. At the point where you decide other people shouldn't have kids for whatever reason is where it gets real iffy real fast.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

iPad kids are a product of capitalism; ergo we should hate capitalism (shock revelation)

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

i just have lingering trauma from working at a restaurant

i see that plate of french fries soaked in root beer in my nightmares

edit now that i think of it it was probably the parents not being able to handle them more than it was the kids themselves

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Just because I don’t like kids doesn’t mean I won’t support free lunches.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

I just dislike people with sticky fingers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

I still find them annoying and want nothing to do with them out of personal preference

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Here’s my take. I am a Marxist-Leninist-Comedyist. Kids are funny, therefore kids are essential to the laughter revolution

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Daily reminder that anti-natalism is reactionary, and anti-natalists should be banned for adopting an extremely cringe reactionary Reddit ideology.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Kids being psy-oped into being annoying does not change the fact that my daily reality of kids being annoying still sucks.

Gen Z is a lost cause in terms of not being annoying. They're good people but suck shit with everything else. I am Gen Z and even people 4 years older than me are annoying and childish.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Gen Z is a lost cause in terms of not being annoying.

downbear

GenZ are poorly socialized, but otherwise cool and fun to associate with. The more time they spend with Millennials, the more they even out and develop as people. Millennials were the same way, back in high school / early college. Coming out of the suburbs, escaping other clueless dorks who aren't used to operating outside a niche, and then ingesting a bigger slice of the world matures you.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

What do you mean when you say it is 'reactionary'? Most traditional ideologies are very pro-natalist

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Kids need to be indoctrinated into communist thought then ill agree, because the american kids are as reactionary as their parents

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

because the american kids are as reactionary as their parents

Kids can and will share and usually be kind to each other (with some exceptions) until their parents push that tendency out of them.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
183 points (100.0% liked)

bloomer

7887 readers
2 users here now

A place for optimism, relentless positivity, anti-doomerism, and snuggle sessions.

We're all in this together, and a better world is possible!

This is now also a space for organizing tips for our collective survival as we confront climate change and everything else. Still no doom-posting. We're here to work together, support each other, and boldly face the future.

Rules:

  1. Familiarize yourself with the site-wide Code of Conduct

  2. No doom, no gloom, only bloom. There's plenty of room for doomerism elsewhere. This community is solely for having a positive outlook on the future and spreading good vibes.

  3. Be kind to your fellow users. This also means no arguing in the comm. Arguments and negativity are not conducive to blooming. Constructive discussion is good. No interest-policing. Support your comrades in their joy!

  4. Always share good news. We can't exactly enforce this one, but if you have good news, please share it with us! Keeping happiness and positivity to yourself is the twelfth type of liberalism.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS