452
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 month ago

Idk I bet there are lots of beavers sluttier than me

[-] TeddE@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Conventions with tons of them!

[-] slowmorella@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 1 month ago

maybe a sheep that got cheated on wrote this article 😢

[-] Codpiece@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

And he even said “Ewe complete me”.

Ffs Rhys.

[-] bryndos@fedia.io 28 points 1 month ago

Surely there can't be that many sheep on Soay to come up with such an estimate.

I suspect the scientist got a bit lonely out there doing the fieldwork, tried something that he'd normally get away with on a domestic ewe, got rebuffed, and wrote this paper to slander the whole species as revenge.

[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Damn sexy sheep!

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago
[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I've been baaaaad.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 month ago
[-] Iunnrais@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

This is actually a more interesting statement than one might think at first.

When we describe the habits of various species of animals, it’s my understanding that once a description is obtained, you can look at more or less any particular member of that species and see pretty much the same behavior. Monogamy trends included.

Not so with humans. You can find an average, describe trends, but pick any specific individual human and they’re almost certainly not going to behave as that description.

Some humans pair bond for life and beyond, never seeking other companionship after one partner dies. Others sleep around constantly with dozens of partners in a lifetime. And everything in between.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 month ago

I don't think this is true. There is certainly a large degree of individual variation in animal behavior too, it's just not that well studied.

I had a professor who studied owls, which are usually highly monogamous. But there was one male who always tried to have two nests with two different females. It was hard for him because he had to hunt twice as much food, but for whatever reason that was what he felt like doing.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

Bro just liked to hunt & needed something to do with all that extra food.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also we have cultural layers on top.

You don’t see a sheep saving itself for marriage lest it fear eternal torture.

Likewise you don’t see a sheep putting its keys into a bowl at a party.

We are more than our nature.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Nope, that's not what it means at all

Genetically linked behaviors follow distribution curves. There is always variation in every population for any behavior. When a behavior is highly selected for, alternative behaviors become more rare...but they still happen.

A good example of this is homosexuality, evolutionarily speaking this behavior is highly selected against (reduced babies). It still occurs in all sorts of species.

What this means is that around 2/3rds of humans are strictly monogamous. Around 1/3rd of humans are promiscuous or partially promiscuous. These are instinctual behaviors that can be overcome somewhat by cultural norms. On an individual basis, for every 3 people you meet, one instinctually finds sleeping around to be their "normal" behavior.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

So you're saying normal humans are incredibly rare. Yep.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

And the culture they live in

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Jesus tending to his flock: "This is not what I meant when I said be like sheep"

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, maybe he actually did and a bunch of never-getting-laid now-pedophiles "edited" certain details to less expression recognition and then raped some kids to keep word shut. Just Sayan. Watch out for that Ram.

[-] Epp4@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

You don't know that! I like to believe that's exactly what he meant. Love one another.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Well sheep also eat grass; I think its more about the shepherding metaphor.

[-] degen@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

What does this say about the Welsh?

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Learning moment for me: does conflict of interest section not include known baises? why wouldn't the researcher being monogamous be listed there?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

I'm definitely putting that on my dating profile. Sluter than a sheep

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I don't understand the methodology at all. Genetic analysis of a mother's babies would show "monogamy" if the alpha male in the herd keeps their status in multiple seasons. The typical polygamy relationship counts as monogamous, afaiu. Could it simply be that sheep change their alpha male each season, instead of everybody fucking everybody rules?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

who wrote this list, idaho?

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oh I am SO happy you have an actual monogamy league table here

[-] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Gives new meaning to the term "sheeple."

[-] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 4 weeks ago

First, what it really measures is not the rate of monogamy (as in being with one partner at a time), but the rate at which animals only mate with one other animal throughout life, without contraception (which humans have).

Second, I wonder how culture shapes the score for humans. A lot of monogamous behavior in humans is shaped not by natural drive to stick to one partner, but by culturally defined repercussions for going out with someone else.

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

kelly Stop sheep-shaming

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
452 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

18958 readers
1682 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS