101
submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/yEIp3

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 3 months ago

I will take one for the team and take $140k a year and report back. It'll be hard, since it's only 3 times what I make now, but it's worth it for science.

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

no please no..rethink how your family will survive the test of this strategist's poverty line.

where are the application papers? im signing up too we're in this together

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Green tested out his $140,000 theory, by looking at national average data on key costs — and calculated $32,773 for childcare, $23,267 for housing, $14,717 for food, $14,828 for transportation, $10,567 for healthcare and $21,857 for what he said were other essentials. Add in federal, state and FICA taxes, and it gets to a gross income of $136,500.

It makes sense, although people are still dumb enough to fall for means testing and declare the arbitrary line should be lower because they don't understand COLA

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago

That first number is why birthrates are at historic lows. Plus kids make up part of all the rest of the numbers.

Kids are far too expensive at this point.

It's not ideal.

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Who needs kids anyway? I can’t understand why some people want lots of kids, each and everyone of them is a significant long-term effort and responsibility.

Be child free and you could buy a brand new car every year with this poverty line.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

The problem is that somebody has to have kids, otherwise we have no more humanity.

If individuals decide they would rather be child free for their own reasons, that's fine. But if capitalism makes everything so expensive that people who want kids can't afford to raise them and never have them in the first place, that is an extinction-level problem

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Not just no humanity, but also it collapses almost every system we have economically. If people stop having kids, there won't be anyone to take care of the tasks required to support the aging population.

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I see it as a future Dubai, where foreigners with little rights make the whole of the workforce, and are the ones having the kids needed to prop the nation.

It’s a shitty future, but hopefully those migrant families are valued and treated better by democratic countries than the opulent Middle East does.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 3 months ago

The only place with projected population growth is Africa, and they're being industrialized too

I mean, maybe we could get the global south to abandon their elderly to take care of ours... That's probably what's going to end up happening if we can't get AI to do it

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Makes sense. About a decade ago it was estimated around 80k. With the post-covid world the way it is I think that increase is reasonable

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

87.5k in SJ, california. 100k is low income there now. now theres like a reverse white flight going in bay area now. the soccer mom karens have returned. signs of gentrification is the increasing amount of CAFES in the area.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

A lot depends on where you live.

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
101 points (96.3% liked)

News

36598 readers
1874 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS