Friendly reminder that the reason we get funny headlines like this from Florida is that the state allows the media full access to their police records so they can find stories like this
post
Defendant: Nuh, uh. Everyone knows it’s called “DWI”—driving while intoxicated—which doesn’t really help me either, does it?
"Your honor, I was not being influenced by the drink I had. It did not say or act in any way such that my behavior would change. Secondly, I was not driving while intoxicated. Intoxicated as defined by the dictionary literally says 'stupefied by alcohol.' that cannot have happened because at no point was I stupid."
Judges LOVE smartasses.
Eh my assumption is that this woman doesn't realize she's being a smart ass to begin with.
and it doesn't matter when the drinking happened
"Checkmate, I injected it!!"
Lawyer: Dude, this defense is so rock solid.
In Germany, you are allowed to drink while driving if you stay below the limit.
You will 100% get pulled over for a funny test, though.
Interesting. In the US, most jurisdictions have open container laws: A drink needs to be either factory sealed or in a place where it is not readily accessible (such as a trunk) or the driver is in violation.
There have definitely been times when I was buying alcohol and carrying it in the front was most convenient, but I gave it a second thought. Definitely put it in back so it’s never a question
I hope this is the beginning of a new Sovereign Citizen style movement that uses hyper-literal misinterpretations of the law as a defense.
I feel like the law is not drunk driving but something more like "operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level above something something..."
Yeah, it's usually Driving Under the Influence (DUI) or Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), not, "Drinking and Driving." But its not like facts have any influence over the Sovereign Citizen movement, so I don't see why we should start here.
New? People being people I'm sure we must have been attempting this kind of defense since Hammurabi, if not earlier...
Yeah, the magic word in the law isn't "driving." It's "while intoxicated." You don't suddenly stop being drunk when you put your beer away. Human physiology doesn't work that way.
Listen up liberal MADD atheists! If you tell us to not drink and drive, then don't make shit up, when we drink when not driving. This is just like the IRS going after criminal fraudulent conservative religious groups. It's a witch hunt!!!!
Wait, her argument is it's the act of drinking (actually passing the liquid into your mouth) that's illegal?
I'm not driving, I'm traveling! 😁
(I used to hate SovCits, but honestly tho, now Americans need more "SovCits" more than ever, there's not enough resistance. I kinda sympathize with them now, they're just a little confused, but got the spirit. Where all the "anti-tyranny" people at? 🤔)
(Edit: And yes I see the article is from 2024)
making fun of people's mugshots is conservative slop
imagine finding it fun to humiliate people you've captured with your unlimited monopoly on state violence, seems pretty fash cucked to me
I agree with the sentiment but there isn't a single post in this thread commenting on the appearance of the mugshot.
Pointing out apropos of nothing, that it's an appearance to make fun of, is in itself a similar behavior to what is being criticized.
Im not seeing any other comments here talking about her looks?
And i think going after drunk drivers is one of the things im pretty okay with the state using its 'unlimited monopoly on violence' for.
Everyone knows the rules of Kario Mart.
Was about to say this. Excellent drinking game. I used to always shotgun mine at the start and drive uninterrupted and tipsy the rest of the race. Good times.
When I was like 4 I went nuts on my mom for drinking and driving. Nevermind that it was a diet coke...


top 50 comments