45
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The contents of the law, according to the article:

The bill introduces prison sentences of between one and five years for the illegal spreading of AI-generated or manipulated content if it causes harm.

There will also be harsher penalties for using the technology to commit crimes, including fraud and identity theft, and stricter transparency and human oversight rules governing how the technology is used in workplaces as well as in a range of sectors such as healthcare, education, justice and sport.

children under the age of 14 will need parental consent to access AI.

When it comes to copyright, the law stipulates that works created with AI assistance are protected if they originate from genuine intellectual effort, while AI-driven text and data mining will only be permitted for non-copyrighted content or scientific research by authorised institutions.

The law authorises up to €1bn (£870m) from a state-backed venture capital fund to support companies active in AI, cybersecurity and telecommunications, although critics argue the sum is small compared with investments being made by the US and China.

I don't know the italian legal system very well, but I would have expected that laws regarding fraud, identity theft etc would already be sufficient so no special treatment of AI in this context should be necessary.

The copyright related data mining part is interesting though. Wouldn't that hinder the development of commercial AI applications or is there a licensing system in place?

Furthermore I wonder how "genuine intellectual effort" is defined. Even before LLMs, image generators and alike, a lot of stuff has received copyrights that one might not consider "genuine intellectual effort". Where is the line drawn?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The line is drawn on ~~how much you bribe us~~ how much can be copied without ever looking at it.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The limit of data mining to only legal sources will kill any AI use. US has a huge line of lawsuits in SDNY against AI companies scraping stolen data.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

The copyright related data mining part is interesting though. Wouldn’t that hinder the development of commercial AI applications or is there a licensing system in place?

That's the EU-wide situation. You can tell that the EU is just not building an AI industry.

It's not just neo-fascists ruining their countries. Though, at least for Germany, there is quite some connection between overreaching copyright and its dictatorial past.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

AI industry....good one. How's that working out so far? Maybe we will watch AI movies on our 3D TVs.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

You're one of those people who think AI is just a fad that will disappear? What do you think of when you write "AI"?

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7347 readers
1097 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS