824
It really did (reddthat.com)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 140 points 1 week ago

They are still being being painted by hand. On a graphics tablet, for example.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

It's not the same. Of course things can be beautiful if painted on a tablet, but differently beautiful.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I guess it's a matter of taste then. I really enjoy the vibrancy and fluidity of animation we get today. And I find them to be no less expressive.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Studio Ghibli stuff has, up until recently, always been done by hand and it's about as vibrant and fluid as it gets.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It is a matter of taste, I agree.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 105 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interestingly enough, 101 Dalmatians was the first Disney film to adopt the process of Xeroxing the animators' drawings directly to cels, rather than hand-tracing them. It's still a beautiful movie of course, but it's also an advance in animation technology that often gets over-looked!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My kid got into Lady and the Tramp, so I watched it about a dozen times in a row, and Holeee shiiit is that thing beautifully animated. The backgrounds are needlessly lavish, and look at this...

I'm in awe of the work done on Tramp's ears. The expressiveness, and the subtle balance of flexibility and internal structure is exquisite. You can find other examples of masterfully-done materials all throughout the movie.

Other movies might get more attention, but Lady and the Tramp is worth looking at for some peak Disney animation.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

It's one of my favourites!

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I am not a big fan of Pinocchio in general, but the animation is absolutely nuts. The part with the whale is truly remarkable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

I totally agree, Disney’s Robin Hood from 1973 is peak hand-drawn cartoon

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Eeeeeeh... Maybe not. It's pretty good, but there is so much recycled animation that you might aswell call the Jungle book the best aswell.

Forgot about Fantasia?

Lion king?

Don bluth cartoons?

Anything made by Miyazaki.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They used a lot of rotoscoping back in the day. Basically they filmed a scene normally with real people, then traced over every frame to give us those fantastic moments of fluid movement in things like Snow White, Mary Poppins, and Beauty and the Beast (which also used 3D by the way).

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Ralph Bakshi used it in the 1978 LOTR. It made the battle scene confusing.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Dude Ralph Bashki made things weird for fun. Maybe if I volunteer to watch the Bashki LOTR with my wife, who loves that movie, I can convince her to watch Wizards with me. I have been wanting to watch that.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Fun fact, some of the more impressive examples from that era (like Mary Poppins) primarily used the sodium vapor process to get perfect mattes directly in-camera, no rotoscoping needed. It's a fascinating and impressive bit of tech: https://www.historicmysteries.com/science/disney-prism/39484/

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

That is indeed a fun fact! I am somewhat obsessed with sodium vapor lights and the bandwidth of light they produce. I would love to have seen the original camera rig and their special prisms, but apparently they only made three and they've been lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Rotoscoping is quite old, too. I think it even predates ww1.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

Fun fact: 101 Dalmatians was the first Disney movie to be produced with the help of xerox. This was as a result of the financial flop that was Sleeping Beauty, that almost bankrupted the company and cut their budgets for future movies all the way from the 60s to the financial success of the little mermaid in 1989. This is why Disney movies within that time period has a rougher look when it comes to the characters' lineart and the more simple backgrounds compared to the very detailed, painted backgrounds and colored lineart of all Disney movies up until 101 Dalmatians.

The xerox was a cost cutting method to save time and money and while it absolutely killed Walt Disney to have to compromise on the art, it also paved the way for a new look and feel that, especially in the case of 101 Dalmatians, created a timeless look that still looks as fresh and modern today as the day it was made.

Without the invention and utilization of the xerox, there most likely would have been no Disney company today.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

The Disney corporation is a better person when it's poor.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Not arguing with you there xD I have basically boycotted Disney. Last straw for me was their Mulan remake.

Didn't watch it. Heard it was trash like all the other remakes, but the thing that did it for me was when I learned they had used actual concentration camp prisoners for free labor on the movie. That was it for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Actual, handmade art and films are why so many of us look back on the 80's nostalgically, whether it's the Muppets, or Freddy's handmade makeup and practical effects, or the Goonies' crew building a whole-ass pirate ship on a soundstage. Practical effects will always be 100% better than CGI or some crap spat out by an LLM.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

The reason why so many people look on the 80s nostalgically is because they were children or teens during the 80s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This was 1961 which is definitely not the ‘80s. However, I get your point; practical effects may have been — and were often — jank, but it was real and tangible and I loved it, warts and all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

My theory is that since practical effects ultimately rely on physics of the world we occupy, that despite their unpolished look, they feel more real. The hyper realistic, but completely reality breaking effects of today just hit the same way cartoons do.

Speaking of cartoons, I love finding the shortcuts that animators would take, there’s something so artistic about how they did it.

I am just so much more engaged when I can watch a movie while also trying to figure out how they pulled off an effect.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

I just recently rewatched 101 Dalmatians and actually cried multiple times just from really soaking it in. Just the way so much of it comes to life. The imperfections genuinely make it feel so much more alive.

Modern Hollywood animation is incredibly sterile and perfected. A major studio now would never imagine releasing something with visible sketch lines.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Sure it wasn't nostalgia? Sounds like the same symptoms

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

I don’t think so. I’ve been watching a lot of classics from my childhood lately and most of them weren’t hitting me that hard. Maybe it’s that the actual story and the horror of it sunk in properly for the first time as an adult. Hadn’t seen it since I was young. The voice acting from the pups is just incredible. That probably didn’t help.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

TBF it was also a time before the corporate entity realized maximum short term profit doesn't come from perfected products.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A lot are still "painted by hand", the use of vector graphics isn't as prevalent in other cartoon producing countries as it is in the US

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Same with the OG Lilo and Stitch:

https://youtu.be/uGVZFLukUZI

IIRC last film to use honest to god water colors. And it shows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I think animation, when the animators care, has improved. Yes treasure planet looks better fight me. But I think the problem is that there is more shit animation now, and we have forgotten the shit animation of the past.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

They were more interested in telling a memorable story than making a quick buck

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
824 points (93.6% liked)

aww

25334 readers
302 users here now

A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.

AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.

While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS