top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Counter question; would it make any difference?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    That's the point - it wouldn't. People seem to expect that things would be different or meaningless if we did but I've never understood that logic. Even if we do live in the base reality it could just as well be a simulation and nothing would need to change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Exactly. Even if it was definitely proven that this is all a simulation, there is exactly zero chance humans could ever break out of it or hack or exploit or even begin to understand the machine the simulation is running on. We have still not even figured out the rules for our universe and understanding what the real universe where this is a simulation is way beyond the scope of human understanding. We could not affect it in any meaningful way except maybe some laboratory tests or cause some hideous corruption. Yet we think and feel and experience living in the only way we know. Hence, I'd argue it would not matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    This is quite literally how many religions view their divine beings. They are so massive that they are beyond your comprehension and we would be powerless to impact them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I think it would matter if these simulations existed if we could interact outside or between them somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    If we'd manage to communicate with parallel universes, would it matter if they are all real or simulations along with ourselves?

    How could we possibly interact with any machinery sophisticated enough to be our entire universe or the parent universe where these machines can be conceived?

    It's like pacman breaking out of assembly language and figuring out how to sneak out of the arcade.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Just because we do t know something doesn’t masks it 50%

    I don’t know if there’s a gorilla in my upstairs bath at the moment but the odds aren’t 50/50

    On the question of god or a simulation, they aren’t 50/50 either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Belief in a simulation implies intelligent design of some sort, so this is, in my opinion, just a 21st century way of asking the age old question, does God exist?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    God is a loaded term though. Yes there would be a creator but it could be a completely passive observer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Same as the odds that a higher being (a god) exists.

    Can't prove it, can't disprove it. All arguments for it speculative and subjective.

    People claim that it is the most likely option because eventually tech will be so advanced that we could make a world simulation, and then we would make multiples, and therefore the probability of this not being a simulation is low.

    This claim assumes that computers CAN get that complex (no indication that they could) it also assumes that if they could, we would create world simulators (Why? Parts of it sure, but all of it?) And it assumes that sentient beings inside the simulation could never know it (Why?)

    It is as pointless as arguing about god.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    well, you're asking this question in a platform which has the sole purpose of presenting a digital representation of social interaction, so I'd say pretty fucking high.

    You don't need the matrix plugging needles into the back of people's heads for the world to be a simulation. smartphones and computer screens are more than enough.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    A simulation wouldn't be this stupid

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I figure that we are all definitely living in a simulation because, even if the world has real physical existence, consciousness is essentially a simulation created our brain to make sense of the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    I mean is there any proof we don't live in a simulation? Like I am not arguing for simulation, neither am I arguing against it just, personally, I don't see simulation theory as something life changing and important. Odds would probably be 50/50, but don't see how it changes anything. If I live in simulation, I live in a simulation and someone is either controlling me or someone predestined me to do what I do, and it would be their fault for bad things happening. That would actually raise question why didn't they gave us more clear understandings of morals so we don't do bad things to each others, also why did they make us kill, and get sick...

    If simulation is not real, then that doesn't change anything we still have questions about who or what made us, who or what was before our universe even existed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Greater than zero.

    You wanna tweak your melon a bit? Look up "Last Thursdayism." It's a thing — due to the way short term and long term memory work, the theory goes that anything before "last Thursday" is a lie. It's an arbitrary day of the week. The movie Dark City played off of this, when the — I forget what they were called — did their tuning and rearranged things and swapped peoples' memories around.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    it depends, can simulations run simulations inside themselves? because if so, i think this would increase the odds. if we were able to model reality, down to the subatomic level, with perfect accuracy, then maybe there's another world simulating us. unless we're in a pretty bad or locked-down simulation that doesn't allow recursion.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    In reality, simulations would outnumber reality. So that’s the ratio and therefore the chances.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    There is no sensible definition of probability that makes that question answerable.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    I don't know.

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
    [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    What are the odds that we are all in a simulation?

    What are the odds that every bullshit that you ever heard is actually true?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Well, until we see people randomly floating or chunks of the world disappearing, the answer will probably remain "who knows"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    If we are I want a word with the dev team. This shit needs a rebalance ASAP. Gravity wells are too OP, black hole mergers should not warp the fabric of spacetime.

    And don't even get me started on Gamma Ray Bursts or Vacuum Decay.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    I don't know about ya'll, but from my perspective, the simulation would only have to simulate my world.

    You all might not even exist.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I think this depends on how you look at it.

    In a certain way, we do live in a fictional world that is constructed of information. If you consider your daily routines, they're probably following instructions of some sort to earn money, besides other things.

    Both of these things - the instructions and the money - are made up. You can see this even more clearly with the money. Money itself is a piece of paper or not even that - a number in a database - that has no real value, yet people believe in it and that belief is what gives it value. In other words, the value of these numbers in databases exists in people's head more than it does in reality. Now, you could consider this a simulation, because it happens inside a computer and influences what people think.

    However, i truly doubt that such a view is meaningful. No matter what is written in the databases, you still have to go through your own, individual life. I feel the biggest question you're implicitely asking is whether there could exist some kind of cheat code or glitch, like in video games, to shortcut through the world and reach your goals easier. Again, depending on how you look at it, there both are and are not such cheats.

    You could consider human technology a sort of cheat. Instead of toiling on the agricultural fields ourselves, we use heavy machinery that is powered by fossil fuels, but more importantly mathematics, to do the work for us. Same goes for all other technologies. As such, the mathematics itself becomes the cheat code.

    If a true cheat code would exist in today's world, you can take solace in the fact that not only you are looking for it, but so is everybody else who has an interest in achieving their goals. Now, you see, the whole economy is simply based on the concept that people want to reach their goals, and to do so, they need resources, for which they need money. So, if a cheat code existed, every single company would have a high interest in finding it and exploiting it. Since the number of people engaged with these desires is quite high, you can assume that significant progress towards that goal is continuously made whenever possible. In fact, people research and invent new things and useful tricks all the time to help us with our daily lifes. If you really wanna know more about this, you should start by studying economics, physics, and society at large. Thank you for your attention, if you have any more questions, let me know :D (i studied philosophy, i might help you)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I want access to the dev console then.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I hope so

    Also, can somebody please turn it off? I think we took this one as far as it's worth

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Probably about the same as for whether a god exists.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    More likely than us being in the "real" base reality

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›