Are there any more statements, public or not, about this? It really seems like the LOC could at least throw a dozen or so technical terms around to add some kind of believability to this whole thing.

If the SC decides to refer to the website as the only legitimate version things will get another interesting twist.

In any case, the Habeas Corpus does not get deleted randomly, this was intentional and should be treated as a canary red flag.

Pay Attention

Do they know if it’s removed from a website its still law?

Compare it to the Gulf of MAGA debacle (or was it Gulf of Trump? I can't seem to be willing to remember). It's not law to call it that (except gov employees), yet the administration shunted outlets that did not use it.

Anyhow, this is just the first step. Next step (probably already in progress) is to push that site, spread screenshots of the edited version, and at some point make the public believe that this is the correct version while some mad libs claim there's a fake piece of paper somewhere that says different.

Mind you, I don't think it will fly. Malcontent is growing even within their own ranks, and that makes people scrutinise things. But that is surely what MAGA want to happen.

And they're throwing so much shit at the wall, some of it sticks regardless.

They're destroying the country. Somewhere there's a cabal of tech bros led by Peter Thiel, and they're laughing like mad scientists, rubbing their hands in glee. "Freedom cities!!!"

Thank you for coming to my Second-Coffee-Rant(tm)

Do they know if it’s removed from a website its still law?

Yeah. If you can convince the relevant authorities that the text exists...