389
submitted 13 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Climate change is making severe storms both more common and more intense.

First the river rose in Texas. Then, the rains fell hard over North Carolina, New Mexico and Illinois.

In less than a week, there were at least four 1-in-1,000-year rainfall events across the United States — intense deluges that are thought to have roughly a 0.1% chance of happening in any given year.

“Any one of these intense rainfall events has a low chance of occurring in a given year,” said Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at the nonprofit organization Climate Central, “so to see events that are historic and record-breaking in multiple parts of the country over the course of one week is even more alarming.”

It’s the kind of statistic, several experts said, that is both eye-opening and likely to become more common because of climate change.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

The weather this year is scaring me more than normal in south Texas. Not because the abnormal amount of rain but because the absolute lack of heat. Usually this time of year it’s 100+ for weeks on end.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

No, see, all this happened to maga coded places not famously queer places, do it's not the wrath of god.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 hours ago

Some are unironically already saying it's evil liberal cloud seeding.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 6 hours ago

Reply that it's God punishing the nation for electing a pedophile president.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

Some are already doing violence about it.

We tried to warn them.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 8 hours ago

Fun fact, the reason we all call it "climate change" and not "global warming" was because the George W Bush administration directed NASA to do so, as they deemed it less "scary" to the public:

In interviews, Republican politicians and their aides said they agreed with the strategist, Frank Luntz, that it was important to pay attention to what his memorandum, written before the November elections, called ''the environmental communications battle.''

In his memorandum, Mr. Luntz urges that the term ''climate change'' be used instead of ''global warming,'' because ''while global warming has catastrophic communications attached to it, climate change sounds a more controllable and less emotional challenge.''

Also, he wrote, ''conservationist'' conveys a ''moderate, reasoned, common sense position'' while ''environmentalist'' has the ''connotation of extremism.''

President Bush's speeches on the environment show that the terms ''global warming'' and ''environmentalist'' had largely disappeared by late last summer. The terms appeared in a number of President Bush's speeches in 2001, but now the White House fairly consistently uses ''climate change'' and ''conservationist.''

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/us/a-call-for-softer-greener-language.html

What drives me insane is how everyone on the left just... went along with it. Now we retroactively rewrite history and claim that they were always separate terms with entirely different distinct meanings. And knowing that so many highly educated, inquisitive, independent thinking people didn't think to question that or look into that, it frightens me.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 53 minutes ago

The left went along with it because they were tired of all the "then why is it so cold in winter?" comments from the stupid half of the family tree.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 7 hours ago

While the Bush administration certainly had (very obviou$) reasons for trying to downplay it, I also remember at least some scientists at the time arguing that climate change was a better term because people are particularly stupid about the term global warming when it paradoxically results in some places having a greater number of and more extreme cold events.

Ex: every time some dumbfuck Republican brought a snowball into Congress to talk about how global warming is fake because look here’s snow!!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

I also remember at least some scientists at the time arguing that climate change was a better term because people are particularly stupid about the term global warming when it paradoxically results in some places having a greater number of and more extreme cold events.

That's how I recall the term climate change coming into favor, too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

That snowball guy finally died last year, thank God. Too bad it wasn't from a flood or hurricane.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

Good to know! They should have been a little more creative and called it something familiar and snappy like Sport Utility Environment or Gas Guzzler.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 9 hours ago

So remember that tipping point we were warned about? Yeah, its happening. The deep ocean currents in the southern ocean have reversed.. TLDR: warmer saltier carbon dioxide rich water is now coming up from the deep ocean instead of being trapped there. It is melting sea-ice from below and could eventually lead to the reversal or stagnation of other ocean currents.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Even better, this occurred about a decade ago, and we didn't even realize it untill now.... meaning the global thermohaline circulation cycle has been collapsing for a decade.

Oops.

Irreversible. Can't fix.

No going back.

In all likelihood, we have Great Filtered ourselves.

Best case scenario, we get a century or so, starting basically now, of civilization collapse, mass famine and death, attempts at mass migrations that mostly get Holocausted, and of course wars, potentially nuclear wars...

...and then maybe in 100 years the remaining human population of roughly 1-2 billion can maybe figure out a new paradigm... if we have not just permanently broken the biosphere, and already extracted all the easily extractable natural resources.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago

Sure glad republicans are in charge of everything

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago

And none blasted that vile Maralago place... Fingers still crossed

[-] [email protected] 37 points 11 hours ago

They're not "1 in a thousand years" anymore!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

4 times a week now!

[-] [email protected] 59 points 12 hours ago

This is gonna create some real bad problems for building codes. Lots of stuff is designed with statistical probabilities in mind, where they account for varying levels of rare extreme weather events. If the 1 in 100 years storm becomes a 1 in 10 years storm, then lots of stuff will be in trouble.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Uh yeah, actuaries have already determined the world GDP will be catastrophically damaged, forever, if we don't limit warming to 2C.

https://actuaries.org.uk/document-library/thought-leadership/thought-leadership-campaigns/climate-papers/planetary-solvency-finding-our-balance-with-nature/

We already blew past 1.5C, if you didn't know... and also, the trend in the last decade is continuously that the climate is breaking harder and faster than the scientific consensus broadly projects... so its probably gonna be actually worse than this.

...

US insurance companies have already figured out that roughly the bottom 1/3 of the US will be uninsurable in 10 years... which is why they're either massively upping insurance rates, or largely pulling out of the home insurance business in CA, FL, other southern US states and regions, which is causing all these states to bankrupt themselves as they try to offer a public/government version of home insurance, but refuse to tax people appropriately or fairly to be able to actuslly fund such an endeavor.

Generally, you can't get a home mortgage without insurance, you can't own and rent a place out if you don't have property insurance.

https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/homeowners-insurance-crisis-hitting-these-15-states-report-says-101524.html

https://theconversation.com/why-insurance-companies-are-pulling-out-of-california-and-florida-and-how-to-fix-some-of-the-underlying-problems-207172

https://abc13.com/post/farmers-insurance-companies-leaving-states-aaa-what-are-high-climate-risk/13518796/

...

tl;dr: You have no idea how fucked we all are.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 56 minutes ago

I remember when 1.5C was the threshold instead of 2. We're already living in yesterday's doomsday scenario.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Generally, you can't get a home mortgage without insurance, you can't own and rent a place out if you don't have property insurance.

So, Canada, then?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I am unironically moving to Minnesota ASAP.

Cheapest to live in decently blue state, all the climate risk assesments I've seen seem to show that, as long as you're not living right on the Mississippi, pretty low comparative climate risks... oh, and their housing market (thus economy generally) is fairly stable, compared to about half of the rest of the country, whose housing market is currently crashing harder than the 06-08 GFC.

Canada isn't a bad option at all, but its actually fairly difficult to legally migrate there.

Its gonna be really, really funny when the Canadians start deporting waves of poor Americans fleeing northward, in about 5 to 10 years.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

it's okay the trump fascists will dismantle NOAA and then we won't know any of this anymore :3

[-] [email protected] 25 points 10 hours ago

lots of stuff will be in trouble.

Like, civilization?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Depends on where you live and how smart the people there were about planning for climate change. Residential houses are probably not the biggest issues. Its the more extreme constructs like skyscrapers and bridges that might be in trouble sooner than that.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago

Or you know, the global supply chain and food systems. Breadbaskets will need to function throughout all this.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

Yeah ofcourse, there are going to be problems in every aspect of our lives. I was just specifically thinking about this statistical thing that is used for building safety considerations during construction.

[-] [email protected] 67 points 13 hours ago

Trump: See how it is? Even the best storms are in the USA now! Make Rains Great Again. Glory to the beautiful me!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 9 hours ago

Anyone remember this classic line from Trump 1.0 about hurricane Florence?

This is a tough hurricane, one of the wettest we’ve ever seen from the standpoint of water

[-] [email protected] 44 points 12 hours ago

Bullshit. Trump will blame this on Democrats.

Kamala Harris as seen by MAGAts:

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

Marjorie Trailerpark Greene is literally advancing a bill to ban chemtrails.

A thing that does not exist nor happen at any kind of scale whatsoever, beyond very, very limited and occasional scientific tests... decades ago, and were funded via programs and grants the Big Bullshit Bill and other Trump EOs have decimated.

They do, literally, unironically, blame made up, magic, conspiracy nonsense instead of even attempting to agree with the vast, vast, vaaaaast majority of climate scientists, and even corpo scientists that work for fossil fuel companies that broadly predicted all this would happen roughly 30 years before public science caught up with it (thanks to the lobbying and propoganda campaigns of the same fossil fuel corps.)

They will do literally anything other than admit that they are wrong, their understanding of the world is objectively delusional.

They're too good at magic sky daddy logic.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 12 hours ago

He already was blaming the Texas floods on Biden. The all powerful Biden, causing all kinds of trouble 7 months after he left office. Trump wishes he had power like that.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 13 hours ago

Ignorance is bad. Willful ignorance is deadly.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
389 points (99.2% liked)

News

30904 readers
3143 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS