363
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Context

Alberta is a conservative Canadian province that is rich because they extract a lot of oil. The Alberta Government opposes all measures that could reduce oil-production or oil consumption.

For instance, when the Canadian Federal Government tried to take measures to reduce plastics pollution, the Alberta Government publically protested.

Calgary is the largest city in Alberta. The city has a traffic violence problem. Data shows it has the worse road deaths and injuries rate of any major Canadian city.

Jyoti Gondek, the Mayor of Calgary, recently suggested building more safe bike lanes to reduce car dependency. A few days later, her office received this warning letter

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 31 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Dear Mx Dreeshen,

In regards to your last letter, I believe I wholeheartedly understand your concerns.

Your letter helped open my eyes to the error in our plans for the city and thus we shall no longer proceed to install our planned dedicated bicycle lanes.

You are correct that we must deal with the increasing demand for access to our great city.

Therefore we shall be announcing vast improvements to our road structure in the form of increased public transport services, dedicated bus-only routes, additional pedestrianised streets in major shopping areas, and even a couple of tram routes, on top of the bicycle lanes laid out in our original plan - all thanks to your wonderful letter!

Get wrecked you spineless automotive shill.

With love,

Jyoti Gondek

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

The Paris evidence is right there for anyone to look at. Everything works, people get to where they need to be on time, AND the air toxicity has plummeted year on year. Excess and avaoidable deaths reduced.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

It’s almost like being a conservative makes you a shitty and evil person and you fuck up wherever you are at.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Tomatoe, tomato.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago

Politicians sponsored by the fossil lobby are the norm, even outside pressure from USA (via ambassadors, state visits, bilateral agreements and extortions, or again lobbyists) is normal.

It's present all over Europe as well tho it's (gotten?) weaker.

[-] [email protected] 123 points 1 day ago

This is not mildly infuriating but an example of extreme stupidity or, more likely, the result of corruption.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

This is definitely to ensure continued reliance on oil and gas.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I hope she crumpled it up, then reconsidered, uncrumpled, took the photo, and then presumably recrumpled it before throwing it away.

Edit: Regendered

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

She built a paper plane out of it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

May she have used it as toilet paper

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago

As if increasing bicycle throughput isn’t increasing vehicle throughput. They’re vehicles, and can probably achieve a higher passenger density than individual cars can on a city street.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

No ,no, the letter specifically singles out motor vehicles. Burning gas is the point. This letter has nothing to do with transporting people.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

Wipe your ass with that.

As demonstrated in Montreal, Toronto, Paris (France), Netherlands (pick any city), Berlin, San Francisco, and every other place that takes transportation seriously, you have to degrow car-centric infrastructure to build people moving infrastructure, including bike lanes.

The growing urban population needs to find more sustainable ways to get around, because you can never satisfy car-centric infrastructure. "One more lane, bro" isn't an actual solution to anything.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Mayor should write back, "Thanks for the letter." And then continue according to plan.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This government has blown up one Calgary transport plan already (they're literally building two halves that don't enter downtown at all now), so that may or may not be wise. Cities don't really have constitutional protections in Canada or Alberta.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

They could use the inside lane of the four lanes on 4th Ave for a bike lane and a lot of their traffic problem would be gone without anyone missing anything. That would be constructive w/o construction tho.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

Throw in dedicated bus lanes with priority at lights and then you're cooking.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For Lemmings from other areas, it doesn't read like a warning, exactly, but in the context of what ~~the Alberta government~~ literally this minster has been doing it kind of is.

Edit: Didn't notice this is signed Devin Dreeshen.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

You don't need to know anything about Alberta or the region. This is just how politicians talk.

If this was about honest concerns he would have addressed why the city plans to build bike lanes. Instead he just talks about "tax dollars" and increasing capacity for "all citizens". Which shows that he has a complete disregard for the existence of citizens who do not take a car for every small move.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

increasing capacity for “all citizens”

The law, in its majestic equality, enables the rich as well as the poor to drive their luxury vehicles everywhere.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Shameful. Must have been a nice bribe!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Based on this I can only imagine they must have full throated support of the green line which would reduce intra-city traffic to allow for greater available capacity for provincial traffic.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Let's read this study about how adding more lanes and roads just makes more congestion, not less and how car alternatives are needed for the future of transportation to arrive. Like, oh I don't know, Bike lanes and increased Public Transit infrastructure. Now, let's throw it in the Garbage and go back to what we've been doing unsuccessfully for the past 75 years.

  • This Guy ☝️
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Such kneejerk.

WHAT DOES THE MATH SAY?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I assume that it's legal to ride a gasoline-fueled moped in the bike lane. Does this make everyone happy?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Dishonorable Devin Dreeshen.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
363 points (97.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

40799 readers
1711 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS