302
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

"We don't have any evidence and we're not telling you who the suspects are, but we're going to fuck them up."

And when it happens, most Americans won't bother to turn off Netflix.

[-] [email protected] 82 points 1 day ago

The Toddler-in-chief throwing a tantrum because he got caught in a lie.

That's just so 2025.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

The only thing that would surprise me in 2025+ is if even one god came forward and revealed themselves. Beyond that? Cthulhu teaming up with the Atlantis navy and a space alien air force? "I wonder if they're looking for additional pilots"

[-] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago

You mean like his own National Security advisor leaked information on previous operations?

As Hanlon's razor goes:

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Incompetence in the white house is easy to see.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

MAGA's razor:

Just assume it's both malice and stupidity.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly. With the regressives, it absolutely is both.

[-] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago

Sounds about right for where we're at now.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Yup if this is the move, it will literally not matter who was told what. Let's just see if schumer is on a plane out of the country in the next week or pledging allegiance to the orange

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

Was it not Pete Keg-breath?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

keg breath 😂

[-] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago

How would one "leak" "fake information", exactly?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Whatever guess they liked best. That way they don't have to make up their own lie

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago

I heard it was Brock Turner that leaked the info.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago

Brock turner? The rapist Brock turner? The Brock turner who rapes?

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Indeed, the convicted felon and rapist Brock Allen Turner.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

This Brock Turner?

The caption reads:

Brock Turner, a Stanford student who raped and assaulted an unconscious female student behind a dumpster at a fraternity party, was recently released from jail after serving only three months. Some are shocked at how short this sentence is. Others who are more familiar with the way sexual violence has been handled in the criminal justice system are shocked that he was found guilty and served any time at all. What do you think?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

I had to check what cabinet position he held and was shocked he wasn't in there. He seems like he has all the qualifications they look for.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

He? You're referring to Brock Turner, the rapist? Right? They Brock Turner, who raped someone,?

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Deranged paranoid fascist liar. Loved by tens of millions.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Always has been.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

Has any reporter asked him, or his bimbo mouthpiece, why "false" information was classified?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They'll just be called nasty and told it's a stupid question and that will hurt their feelings too much to risk asking it.

With competent media when the question is not answered and they try to move on the next person would say "I would like an answer to [previous question]" instead of asking their own sanitized government approved question. But then they wouldn't get invited to the president's Big Boy Birthday Party.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

Smells like a witch hunt. I wonder who he will select as the witch hunter general.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

What if the "low trust" members need to know the information? This reeks of a power grab, to me

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Acting like a real communist there trumpy

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Patel: "I'll get right on it, boss."

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Far be it from me to protect this idiot, but wasn't the whole ruse he was trying to do aimed at getting the wind out of Israel's sails by claiming he destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities?

And I really don't know who leaked the BDA pics, but it would benefit Israel and the regime change band for his lie to fall apart, right?

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
302 points (98.7% liked)

politics

24382 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS