634
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Donald Trump was unhappy with his sparsely attended military parade over the weekend and blamed it on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, biographer Michael Wolff revealed.

Wolff told The Daily Beast Podcast that Trump wanted a “menacing” show of force to celebrate the Army’s 250th anniversary and his 79th birthday on Saturday—but got a “festive” parade instead.

“He’s p---ed off at the soldiers,” Wolff said. “He’s accusing them of hamming it up, and by that, he seems to mean that they were having a good time, that they were waving, that they were enjoying themselves and showing a convivial face rather than a military face.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 233 points 2 days ago

He's not happy they smiled and waved at the people they signed away their lives to protect.

[-] [email protected] 135 points 2 days ago

This is how Trump treats the US Army soldiers who were forced to march in front of Trump for a day that was supposed to celebrate them and their accomplishments.

Thank you to the US Army for trying to pit something together that would be fun for US citizens. If it weren't for Trump smearing his shit all over everything I'm sure plenty more would have turned out to show their support as real Americans celebrating real patriots rather than the fascists so many US soldiers have died fighting against.

[-] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago

Didn't see much of it but the uniforms and equipment from every era was hella cool. They actually made it about army history, not a goose-stepping show of force.

[-] [email protected] 61 points 2 days ago

This is precisely why Trump is so angry

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago

Frankly, it’s just about the best way the Army could have handled this whole thing.

Always remember: the vast majority of the US Army is very, very good at malicious compliance. I’m pretty sure the E4 mafia grants you an unofficial Malicious Compliance MOS once you make that rank.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are two types of people who survive decently in the military. Those who can find every loophole and can maliciously comply, and those who allow themselves to be completely broken and reshaped into perfect compliance by the system.

Many people believe the second group is more common, but it’s really not, since those people tend to be in lower ranking positions. Bullet catchers and the like.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Drumpf isn't a fan of history, or learning.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] [email protected] 189 points 2 days ago

This Presidential outburst is brought to you by:

Coinbase

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Trump Mobile would have been a better sponsor

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 67 points 2 days ago

"we aren't kings"

Cries when parade isn't dictator-y enough.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

Hegseth, you royally fucked it up. Leaking classified military in a Signal group chat? Excusable. A White Supremacist? Excusable. Drunken paranoia? Excusable. HOW DARE YOU FUCK UP THE PARADE!? Pack your shit up and go back to Fox News.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago

Goose stepping is actually incredibly difficult and has no military value

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

HAHAHAHAHA what a fucking toddler. Did they not have enough plain cheese pizza with ketchup for your bday party, you pathetic attention-hungry piece of shit

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

He didn't want PIZZA! He wanted FRENCH FRIES from MCDONALDS!!! He wanted RONALD to personally cut his burger up for him because it's EMBARRASSING when his MOM does it! He wanted to use the SLIDE but he POOPED on it before he made it to the bottom and that's SOMEONE ELSE'S fault!!!

[-] [email protected] 79 points 2 days ago

Dictators always blame others for their failings.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago

But hegseth is a failure too.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

Take it easy in the admins token DUI hire

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago

This is what you get when your hiring criteria is who is the best ass kisser.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

DEI. Dumb (and) extra idiotic.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

He’s trying to be a dictator damn it! Why won’t anyone take him seriously? Waaaaah

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 109 points 2 days ago

And only $46 million down the drain

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago

What's that really though - golf trip security and accommodation costs alone for Trump in just his second term thus far have already cost around that. For which he insists the secret service and other support staff use his own golf courses and hotels so that he literally gets paid handsomly to golf & stay at his own resorts (breaking the emoluments clause of the Constitution in the process).

At least none of that $46mil went to Trump & co and the whole affair embarrassed him by the poor turnout and mediocre parade. Money well spent it was not, but at least he hated it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 95 points 2 days ago

"He’s p---ed off at the soldiers,” Wolff said. “He’s accusing them of hamming it up, and by that, he seems to mean that they were having a good time, that they were waving, that they were enjoying themselves and showing a convivial face rather than a military face.”

The Disaster in Chief doesn't even know what the fuck "hamming it up" means. 🤦‍♂️

[-] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago

I think he somehow associates their behavior with a lack of discipline. He expected coordinated … 🪿 stepping and unwavering devotion to their CiC who has zero respect for them or something? I can’t wrap my head around whatever circles of logic he tries to use

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I'm going to say I 100% agree with you. The lunatic wants North Korean style marches and is angry that's not happening.

But I also want to say, what clips I've seen holy crap their marching was abysmal, like I've seen Civil Air Patrol flights with better marching. I'm not military so I can only talk so much, when listening to vets, their comments are along the lines of the people in the parade basically doing a shitty job because "Mandatory Fun Day" as apparently it's called.

Frankly I think that's funny myself.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Their marching was poor because there is almost no practical reason why anyone in today's Army should ever need to march. The vast majority of service people do very little marching after basic training.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago

that they were enjoying themselves and showing a convivial face rather than a military face.

If he didn't want soldiers that were excited to be there, then why did he have them screened for political association to make sure they were his supporters?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago
[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

In addition to screening for BMI, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 67 points 2 days ago

No one likes you bitch! That's why no one showed up to your backwoods shin-dig. You're a huuuuge orange joke. The likes of which the world has never seen before.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago

And this is why he will get the us involved in Iran. He needs something to boost his ego after this amazing by failure.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 69 points 2 days ago

It's so lovely to hear that he's unhappy!

Hopefully it really hurts his fee-fees that he's despised by anyone with a remotely functioning brain

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

So their only job is to walk in a straight line, and they pick Alchohegseth to train them? Never could have seen this coming.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago
[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

I wonder what Kim Jong Un’s reaction was when he saw the photos of Trumps dinky little parade

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

as a tangent we really need to take journalists aside and talk to them about the phrases they're coining to avoid repeating themselves every time they need to describe "talking shit" or "yell at" in an article title.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

I automatically down vote all posts with "slam" and "blast" in the headline. Doesn't matter what the actual news is

That shit needs to stop

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago

Awwww.... no one showed up to wittle Donnie's birthday party.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

I couldn't go. I have bone spurs

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Add "cause and effect" to the list of things he does not grasp or pretends not to. There wasn't some time lord showing people the parade would be too festive. It's a decision made by birthday party attendees in advance which reflects poorly on his ego so it needs to be blamed on anybody but him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

Guess he'll be trying to outlaw smiling and looking happy now

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

What a spoiled baby, whining about how his birthday party didn't live up to his dreams.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
634 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24228 readers
2940 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS