346
submitted 23 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A man who was believed to be part of a peacekeeping team for the “No Kings” protest in Salt Lake City shot at a person who was brandishing a rifle at demonstrators, striking both the rifleman and a bystander who later died at the hospital, authorities said Sunday.

Police took the alleged rifleman, Arturo Gamboa, 24, into custody Saturday evening on a murder charge, Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd said at a Sunday news conference. The bystander was Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39, a fashion designer from Samoa.

Detectives don’t yet know why Gamboa pulled out a rifle or ran from the peacekeepers, but they accused him of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo’s death. The Associated Press did not immediately find an attorney listed for Gamboa or contact information for his family in public records.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 22 points 16 hours ago

Oh look. A conservative traitor instigated the violence.

I am many shades of unsurprised.

Domestic terrorists folks. Every last one. Because they've all chosen to support it despite knowing. Time to start treating them like the terrorists they are.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Really? Come on man…

[-] [email protected] 29 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

What I'm reading is that the guy with a rifle, Gamboa, has attended protests armed before. It looks like the peacekeeper thought he was a shooter, but there's no evidence so far Gamboa did anything illegal.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yea what I read was that he was "pointing a rifle at protesters".

Don't aim a gun at a person if you are not ready to fight and die.

I would argue this is not only self defence, but public defence.

Edit: looks like its not completely clear if he was brandishing the rifle or just open carying, obviously my argument doesn't technically hold water if he was just open carrying.

I would also argue that open carying a weapon well know for use in mass shootings right next to a large crowd is probably a dumb idea even if it's legal to do.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah in another thread there's an interview of the rifleman from his time in a punk band talking about the system. This is likely going to be a shit show when the partisan pundits pick it up

[-] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago

It looks like the peacekeeper thought he was a shooter

As he should.

Brandish a firearm in public, you are attempting to intimidate others, so you'll get treated like the terrorist you are.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

Isn't this what the NRA wants? Sounds like a good guy with a gun stopped a potential mass shooting.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I just posted elsewhere, but in short, there's no proof that Gamboa brandished a gun, and I've seen a video which looked like he was pointing the rifle downward. Not saying it can't go the other way once more info comes out, but just like when you shouldn't automatically take the police's word when they shoot someone, we shouldn't take the word of private security.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

That's not the law, or reality in America. It's a regular occurrence at certain protests for people to open carry weapons. Not saying I would do it, but it's not sufficient cause to shoot someone.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Brandishing a weapon is not the same as carrying it. Brandishing is what you do when moving the firearm in a way that indicates you are threatening to shoot. In the worst case, it involves pointing the firearm at someone.

If someone purposely points a firearm at you, you have every right to fire in self defence. At least those were the rules of engagement we were taught regarding interactions with civilians at home when I was in the army.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

This gif isn't loading on my phone, but supposedly it's the same as a video I had seen earlier - it shows Gamboa walking towards the street but his rifle is pointed down. It also shows the yellow vested people pointing their guns toward him. If the gif also doesn't work for you, scroll further up in the thread to at least see screenshots. The op of that thread, Chad Loder, has been commenting on this shooting a fair amount. https://bsky.app/profile/nope-notnow.bsky.social/post/3lrp7xsx3vs22

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I was commenting on the general situation of "are you justified in treating someone brandishing a weapon as a lethal threat?", not the specifics of this situation. I haven't seen the video, so won't comment on whether this person specifically was brandishing or not.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago

Open carry and brandish have distinct legal definitions.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

This gif isn't loading on my phone, but supposedly it's the same as a video I had seen earlier - it shows Gamboa walking towards the street but his rifle is pointed down. It also shows the yellow vested people pointing their guns toward him. If the gif also doesn't work for you, scroll further up in the thread to at least see screenshots. The op of that thread, Chad Loder, has been commenting on this shooting a fair amount. https://bsky.app/profile/nope-notnow.bsky.social/post/3lrp7xsx3vs22

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Oh to be clear I wasn't arguing the reality, but brandishing is what he's accused of and that's legally very different from open carrying.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Also it wasn't open carried to the protest, it was retrieved mid protest from a hidden location

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

This gif isn't loading on my phone, but supposedly it's the same as a video I had seen earlier - it shows Gamboa walking towards the street but his rifle is pointed down. It also shows the yellow vested people pointing their guns toward him. If the gif also doesn't work for you, scroll further up in the thread to at least see screenshots. The op of that thread, Chad Loder, has been commenting on this shooting a fair amount. https://bsky.app/profile/nope-notnow.bsky.social/post/3lrp7xsx3vs22

[-] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

That is what I'm thinking. At first I went along with the speculation that Gamboa was intending to shoot into the crowd. But after reviewing the video, it looks more like he was just walking and open carrying with the rifle pointed down. It might not have been the best move in hindsight, but he had the legal right to do so.

Also after listening to his Slugmag interview I'm just not seeing the motivation for a mass shooting. Unless maybe he intended to shoot cops or something. He just doesn't seem to fit the profile & ideology of a mass shooter.

Edit: the interview if anyone is curious https://www.slugmag.com/soundwaves/episode-364-rade/

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Which video are you talking about? Please provide a link.

EDIT: I think this is it. The short snippet shows the barrel pointed down. Having a masked gunman in a crowd of people is terrifying af!

https://imgur.com/a/z3J25EB

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Dressed in all black with a mask and a gun walking briskly toward a crowd...

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Helpful link, thank you

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago

Maybe guns are bad, and maybe if you bring a rifle to a high tense situation and hold it in any manner that may seem threatening, you deserve to get shot. Super sad that an innocent died. Had the "good guy" with a gun hit the target only, then at least there would only be one less moron carrying an AR-15 today, not a sad casualty.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

Yup. If you brandish a firearm in public, you are clearly trying to intimidate others. You deserve to be shot down.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Does this apply to the people that open carry AR-15s when they go to McDonalds?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

Yes. Ammosexuals should be illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

I assume the national guard and marines will roam the syreets of SLC now.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
346 points (99.4% liked)

News

30241 readers
4051 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS