this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1035 points (94.7% liked)

Political Memes

8074 readers
3338 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Missed a few.

Johnson: use war to win re-election

Nixon: fight hippies and commies

Ford: pardon Nixon

Carter: attain energy independence

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago

Now that's an infographic

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Rich people are richer than ever though, so at least the red party delivered.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I would point out that, objectively, Clinton did achieve a budget surplus, and Kennedy's program eventually got us to the moon (though he, obviously, didn't live to see it). Say what you will about the ACA. No matter what standard you take, that's at least a 2/3rds success rate for the blue party by your measure.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

ACA was a huge success in the millions of additional people with healthcare. This saved lives. Lots of lives.

The possibility of Universal Healthcare was dropped: this was not a goal of ACA. Most of us expected a follow up to ACA that would do that, but too many people voted for politicians fighting against it. Despite ACA being overwhelmingly popular, it hurt Dems in elections and they really haven’t had an opportunity to do much since

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Which let’s be real - the only reason there was opposition to the ACA was because Obama did it. It was basically RomneyCare. Most people (on the right) opposed to the ACA didn’t actually know why they didn’t like it - it was done by that uppity guy who wore a mustard suit.

My little brother has a genetic disorder - already had multiple, intensive surgeries by his tenth birthday. He would have capped out his lifetime insurance payouts around the time the ACA passed. He would probably not be able to get any form of insurance now because of his preexisting conditions, if not for the ACA.

The ACA’s problem was that it did not have a public option. We aren’t operating under a free market - insurance companies are colluding with each other and hospitals. There is no actual competition. Even if universal healthcare wasn’t a moral imperative (how the fuck do you keep up your insurance when you’re sick? when the company you work for fires you because you miss too much work?), it’s also not even being run by the rules of the “free market.”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

If I remember correctly a survey of people was done asking how they felt about "the ACA" and how they felt about "Obamacare." They approved of the ACA and HATED Obamacare...

Fucking propaganda man...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The ACA’s problem was that it did not have a public option.

That's still rationing healthcare by wealth. The problem with the ACA is that it was written by liberals and relies on capitalism. The best healthcare systems use central planning and are free or near free.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I mean, agreed, but at least having the public option would drive down some prices. Our health care system is a failure even by the standards of liberal capitalism.

Rolled my ankle a few weeks ago - probably fractured it, hobbled around and now I can walk on it without hurting. No medical care - I’m saving up $300 for my blood work for my routine check up and figured that even the Urgent Care would do nothing and charge me $100 for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

The ACA gave me affordable healthcare when I was young and poor and had none.

Republicans have never even come close to doing something like that for me. Quite the opposite actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago

Oops, all Heritage Foundation.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The two party system is cooked.

Nothing will get better till the two party system is a thing of the past.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

Gotta switch to proportional representation if you want to break up the two parties. I suggest Sequential Proportional Approval Voting for multi-winner elections, and pair it with regular Approval Voting for single-winner elections. Both can be implemented at every level in the US, and some places can do so by referendum. Lemme know if you're interested.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah let me ignore all the atrocities that blue presidents committed abroad, those don't count since its brown people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Weird cuz a lot of things Clinton did seem to be more money for rich people too

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That was always their secondary goal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Reducing the deficit by cutting things that benefit the working class coincides with money for rich people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

Theodore Roosevelt: Be a badass mother fucker

[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But but Donny gonna send us $5k by Febru-sprin-summer!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

It's not about the party or the POTUS, it's all about the oligarchs who are funding the parties and really make things happen. All of them were in debt to oligarchs and had to return the given money for the campaigns somehow. Don't be fooled, as long as the funding of political parties isn't reformed to prevent these oligarchs to grab everything there will not be much for the rest of us. Just enough to avoid revolt and riots as long as sustainable. Democracy in the USA is a mascarade.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Dems: More money for millionaires. Reps: More money for billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

And the Americans are dumb enough to fall for the red lies every time they run.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago

Nixon’s Southern Strategy

Winning elections for Republicans since 1968

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Maybe nobody actually gives a shit about "balanced budgets", imperialism in outer space, or sabotaged healthcare.

Whitey on the Moon

[–] [email protected] 125 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

This is not true. Trump's goal as president is to stay out of prison.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

That was his goal as a candidate. His goal now is to put everyone else in ~~prison~~ concentration camps.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That was goal 1, now goal 2 is excuting the biggest grifting world tour ever seen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Arguably, all were successful except Obama.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It was too partisan I think. The ideals of universal Healthcare were not fully realized but definitely did expand Healthcare access, which isn't enough.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There were a couple corporate dems that ratfucked progress

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

The dems could have kicked them off all committees, the president appoints the head of the IRS and the Attorney General, either of whom can fuck a politician up, or just removed the filibuster. Pelosi chose to let Liberman be the villain of the week. Same shit we saw under Biden where every week 1 dem or another or the parliamentarian or norms would stop the democrats from doing anything that might improve people's conditions (and get the dems reelected).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 141 points 21 hours ago (11 children)

they all got more money for rich people. did any of them impose term limits, stop insider training, or impose any meaningful penalties for those that already have a lot of wealth? they got wealthier and so did all around.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

They literally didn't, though. Clinton obtained surplus by raising taxes and by removing several caps which benefitted the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_Bill_Clinton_administration

President Clinton oversaw a healthy economy during his tenure. The U.S. had strong economic growth (around 4% annually) and record job creation (22.7 million). He raised taxes on higher income taxpayers early in his first term and cut defense spending and welfare, which contributed to a rise in revenue and decline in spending relative to the size of the economy. These factors helped bring the United States federal budget into surplus from fiscal years 1998 to 2001

raising taxes on the wealthiest 1.2% of Americans.[5] It also imposed a new energy tax on all Americans and subjected about a quarter of those receiving Social Security payments to higher taxes on their benefits.

The 28% rate for capital gains was lowered to 20%. The 15% rate was lowered to 10%. In 1980, a tax credit was put into place based on the number of individuals under the age of 17 in a household. In 1998, it was $400 per child and in 1999, it was raised to $500. This Act removed from taxation profits on the sale of a house of up to $500,000 for individuals who are married, and $250,000 for single individuals. Educational savings and retirement funds were given tax relief. Some of the expiring tax provisions were extended for selected businesses.

Clinton signed the bipartisan Financial Services Modernization Act or GLBA in 1999.[41] It allowed banks, insurance companies and investment houses to merge and thus repealed the Glass-Steagall Act which had been in place since 1932. It also prevented further regulation of risky financial derivatives. His deregulation of finance (both tacit and overt through GLBA) was criticized as a contributing factor to the Great Recession.[citation needed] While he disputes that claim, he expressed regret and conceded that in hindsight he would have vetoed the bill, mainly because it excluded risky financial derivatives from regulation, not because it removed the long-standing Glass-Steagall barrier between investment and depository banking. In his view, even if he had vetoed the bill, the Congress would have overridden the veto, as it had nearly unanimous support.[2]

What Clinton did was disadvantage income against capital gains further, thus preventing more people from the middle class and upper middle class to become rich through work, while making it easier for rich people to become even richer. Add to that the deregulation of banks so more "too big to fail" casino players could play in a more deregulated casino which then needed to be bailed out a few years later. By slashing and taxing social security benefits he also made it so that less people could lift themselves out of poverty, which would not only lead to more poverty but also increase spending long term as people kept relying on insufficient benefits instead of getting the means to gain self sustainability and subsequently contribute more to taxes than they needed in temporary aid.

tldr: Clinton fucked the poor and middle class and benefited the rich. He just was more clever about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago

And cutting the social safety net.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›