this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
588 points (97.1% liked)

News

29393 readers
3263 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 44 minutes ago

almost every parent is irresponsible selfish trash. there's no need to put a person through a lifetime of pain just so you can have a few years of fun playing mommy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago

Thank goodness my second child isn’t due today.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I’m 42 and I’ve been told this like every 5 years or so.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And have you not seen things heading in that direction? I’m 57 and I sure as hell have.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Oh yes definitely I’ve seen it slowly going from bad to worse, I guess i meant to say that I’m tired and exhausted from it. And from no one in power actually wanting to do anything about fixing it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

Fun fact! The people who control who is in power!

The people don't want change. They want their luxury, their excess. Even at the cost of the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

That's on the people to vote for people who actually care.

Green parties rarely win, and that's on us.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

Bernie Sanders has been screaming consistently about it for decades.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is actually optimistic. They think kids are going to grow up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

They think people these days can afford to have kids.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's gonna be awesome when we're old and need end of life care and the younger generations are too poor to help us and too stupid to help us even if they weren't poor.

We're headed into a very, very stupid and depressing future. And it's 100% avoidable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago

*was avoidable, by taking steps 25-40 years ago. Boomers took us right over the edge of any cliff they could find, again and again.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Welcome to COSCO, I love you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So uh what do I call what we are living in right now?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 22 hours ago

The calm before the storm.

What we've got now is peanuts compared to what kind of future we're looking towards.

yay.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

And we're STILL not willing to reign in capitalism.

We doomed ourselves. My pity is reserved for all the species we're taking with us in this murder/suicide for short term profit for the avarice diseased. Those capitalists are by far most to blame, but no one that contributes to the capitalist machine, myself included, is without blame for the effectively permanent destruction of our COMMUNal habitat.

Unless you're an eco-terrorist who has been actively trying to destroy the capitalist machine, the precious few good guys as far as I'm concerned if your goal is a viable habitat for our species at all beyond the next couple decades, we've all been seeing this oncomming train heading towards us our entire lives and done nothing of note.

We can't keep living like we've been living, as gluttonous consumers with 78 kinds of plastic packaged cereal made a thousand miles away in any form AND survive as a species, and it's clear which choice we've made. We aren't willing to live closer to the land, to farm the food our community eats, to live small lives understanding we are subject to earth and not the other way around, so we gotta go so life can go on without us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Humans are pretty resilient. I don't think we're going to go extinct, unless we do the nuclear winter thing, which I personally believe is inevitable on a long enough timeline. Short of that, we'll see mass death and an extreme decline in quality of life, but we'll probably, unfortunately, continue on as a species. Either way, we'll end up destroying this planet eventually. We simply cannot exist in symbiosis with nature.

I'm not really on the fence about the bright vs dark future thing anymore, as you can see by my name. It's pretty much guaranteed we've chosen the dark future option.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blah blah ecofascist doomerism. We can live harmonically with nature and have for most of our history. Our current consumerist society isn't compatible with sustainable and responsible practices but that isn't a forgone conclusion or intrinsic to human behavior. That's not to say that we aren't on a bad path, we absolutely are and a great many organisms are going extinct because of us, but ascribing a moral value to our very existence is the wrong move.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not true. Humans always reproduced to the absolute limit (set by their agricultural technology and the bodies of women). The reason why this didn't wreck the environment is because that limited population was too small to turn 50% of land into farmland, they didn't know how to burn large amounts of coal and they didn't have the technology to produce harmful chemicals.

But i agree that humanity (or any other species) has no value. Saying humanity has value is like saying the white race has value. It's pure aestethics, it's not worth it to make anyone suffer for that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Humans always reproduced to the absolute limit

My understanding is that this is not true. The big factor seems to be infant mortality, as that drops so does the average number of children per breeding pair.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shit, just what I want to read while my girlfriend is in labour.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just tell her to try and hold things in until tomorrow, that should help.

Congrats!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Millennials been saying this since we were teens but were told to shut up and sit down

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

It’s why I’m not having kids tbh

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In an analysis of human exposure to climate change extremes — such as heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires, cyclones and crop failures — researchers found that children born in 2020 are two to seven times more likely to face one-in-10,000 year events than those who were born in 1960.

Why pick (great) grandparents as the reference point?

Wouldn't it be more practical to compare them with their parents?

Edit: the actual study does show comparative data for other cohorts (i.e. every decade since 1960). Unless the average LiveScience reader is in their 60s, they just picked a weirdly unrelatable way to describe the study.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

YES WE FUCKING KNOW

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Stop having kids. No, it won't prevent the climate from going to shit. Yes, it will prevent you from creating new victims.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

The only thing Evil (aka. suffering, disease, war,...) needs to exist is that 'good' people continue to have children.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

So, Blade Runner was a future documentary ? And then Blade Runner 2049?

load more comments
view more: next ›