This isn't an AI problem. This is a "most humans are assholes" problem. How hard is it to say "Oh, you don't have what I need? That's too bad. Can you please cancel my subscription?"
post
Solution is simple. Since she doesn't seem to think that AIs hallucinate, just tell her to have an AI generate the maps she needs.
Ha! Humanity is cooked, not because the AI will take over, but because we'll just hand it control 🙄
The key constant with humanity is stupidity. Forever and always people are dumb af.
We already have.
Social media algorithms are already determined elections and have made Gen Z the first generation to get more conservative than the previous one.
Humanity isn't fucked. Some people are fucked. Imagine she asked an human agent to purchase it for her, and she blindly believing the agent.
She would at least blame the human instead of site owner.
Then we're double cooked because AI is dumb because we created it.
Fuck AI, but also... A subscription for maps?
Edit: to clarify, my then-precaffeinated brain thought this meant for a single map at a time (like a PDF), not something that gets continuously updated
If you want a bunch of data no one else has, you’re entitled to charge for it. From looking at their site, they’re a historical/statistical map provider which is data that you won’t find through Google/Apple/OSM’s public data.
Another modern example, back country and overlanding routes. There's a decent amount of work and danger that goes into it, and not enough public interest for the big dogs to warrant mapping out the paths-less-traveled.
I get GPX routes and roll maps from TAT and BDR because these trails are not even on OpenStreetMaps.
Yes, there's some old stuff archived out there for free, but it's very limited and hit or miss. People who have collected a decent digital archive of things you would have found in a library decades ago deserve to make some money for their service.
Worth noting that OpenHistoricalMap does exist: https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
Entirely plausible and even probable, though, that a commercial site has more historical map data than OHM does.
Not really a new thing. Before GPS was in everyone's pocket, you had to get specialized devices. The companies that made those generally gave you 1 free World Map download (or in some cases only your region for free), but future updates or expansions to it would cost a non-trivial amount.
I'm honestly surprised that one of the big players hasn't tried to offer some sort of premium map subscription now that I think about it, though.
ETA: also, physical maps and atlases could be purchased on subscriptions through mail-in stuffs before the internet
Mapquest was revolutionary for offering free driving directions where previously that cost money and was usually only worth paying for on major road trips. Google took that and supercharged it by offering free directions on your phone, joining a growing list of products where they took something that used to cost money and offering it for “free” in exchange for all your information.
I know a university professor who has had this kind of interaction with a student who claimed that they had graded an exam wrongly because ChatGPT gave a different answer. The STUDENT called the PROFESSOR a liar because AI gave a different answer...
When I was in school I called my teachers liars/misinformed/uninformed all the time. I just didn't have chatgpt to summarize why, so I actually had to read a book if I wanted to make that claim and back it up. There's nothing wrong with disagreeing with your professor, you shouldn't trust anything that anyone says blindly, ESPECIALLY FUCKING CHATGPT
Reminds me of a cartoon of two guys in a bar and one says, "Oh yeah, like you know more than the Internet!"
I remember reading about the same thing with authors being given as sources for papers they never wrote.
And now their site is down.
No it isn't. I just checked and it loaded fine.
FYI, the passage of time means both things can be true.
Sure, but what does ChatGPT say?
I'm confused, why not just refund her and be done with it? Then again, it's possible they offered but the customer was still angry they didn't have something.
top 50 comments