Source (Threads)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 133 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If you want a bunch of data no one else has, you’re entitled to charge for it. From looking at their site, they’re a historical/statistical map provider which is data that you won’t find through Google/Apple/OSM’s public data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Another modern example, back country and overlanding routes. There's a decent amount of work and danger that goes into it, and not enough public interest for the big dogs to warrant mapping out the paths-less-traveled.

    I get GPX routes and roll maps from TAT and BDR because these trails are not even on OpenStreetMaps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Yes, there's some old stuff archived out there for free, but it's very limited and hit or miss. People who have collected a decent digital archive of things you would have found in a library decades ago deserve to make some money for their service.

  • source
  • parent