top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 44 points 1 year ago* (63 children)

We'd have a lot of empty houses and maybe cheaper houses.

Look. Personally, I love renting. Its fleksible.i can move whenever i want to and not think about selling. Also i can live in places where houses are practically unsellable and not worry that I can't sell once I want to live somewhere else

Also, I don't have to worry about repairing and maintaining the house. If I window breaks, I call the landlord. If a pipe breaks a leak, I call the landlord. For me, renting is great!

  • source
  • hideshow 63 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    @cosmicrookie @stabby_cicada you could still have rental houses in a system with no landlords

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    My brother in Christ you're the one paying for those repairs and more yourself, it's not like the landlord does it personally. Some might to save a buck, but you're still paying the bill.

    Oh and all those repairs are tax deductible so they will pay less than you will on taxes usually.

    Oh and if they would have to pay taxes, you're paying the taxes for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd be happy to rent if the value of houses didn't double every decade.

    Here in Australia you really just work so you can pay your mortgage. The wealth you accrue through your life is mostly the value of your house rather than the money you save.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    you really just work so you can pay your mortgage.

    Of course. Why would we work so hard to keep jobs that most of us hate if we didn't have mortgages and rent to pay? This is how the machine keeps itself turning. If only there was a motor that wasn't so exploitative in nature...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Saying that you add nuance with that comment, is like saying anti-vaxers add nuance with their views.

    It is proven time and time again that when something is done against landlords the normal people benefit. See Vienna for example, or the early ccp or the whole movement of and views of Henry George.

    You can also see full video about the topic in Britain here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Thing is, someone owns those houses and it's certainly not poor people like me. Also we need more housing in most western countries and private entities are definitely not going to build it if they can't rent it out. We need to figure out a way to force public entities like the state to build more housing.

    A communist (or similar) revolution might take care of it, but that's a lot more involved than "all landlords disappear".

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Mortgage payments are often cheaper than rent. The barrier for poorer people to owning is usually downpayment requirements and credit. There are many reasons for the "housing crisis;" most stemming from real-estate being treated as a speculative asset or "investment," which incentivizes all kinds of phenomenon harmful to society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If all those people that have money to build houses were forced to give it away (taxes), we the people (the government) could just build the houses and not charge exorbitant rent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    There's a lot of smug "well actually" commenters in this thread, who have completely missed that the meme is making a rhetorical point about the nature of rent-seeking rather than sincerely advocating for the sudden disappearance of all landlords.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We'd have more houses, they gotta live somewhere too

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I could go on vacation twice a year if I didn't pay rent.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    All y'all need to read about Georgism.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Yeah Henry George is a true American treasure. I've been a Georgist for about 17 years now. Seems like the movement is finally gaining a little bit of momentum. Or at least people are talking about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Let's some to simplify every person gets to buy only one home and this is only for them and their families to enjoy.

    Now they still have more money than you. They just won't invest in a house but somewhere else instead. Now nobody can rent, great all the banks now get a ton of revenue for all that money they lend out because everybody needs to buy. (Making them insanely rich)...

    Inequality is the problem, just peddling a simple solution like getting rid of one symptom is not gonna fix this. Also changing the system has historically done nothing in that way either.

    Taxing the rich would. ;)

    Landlords are easy to hate, but they are necessary. Having them paying high taxes and having strong protections for renters will keep them honest and contributing and the market balanced.

    Let's start with some constructive work instead of hate flaming memes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›