blarghly

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Please tell me where this has been tried. I know of no major government entity which has enacted Georgist tax policy.

If you hate capitalism, you are missing the big picture - the enemy of the average person isn't the accumulation of money and respurces, but the accumulation of power - money and resources being but one aspect of this. Capitalism is good because it mostly occupies the psychopaths with becoming rich, rather than seeking seats of power in government. Capitalism is the best form of innovation and resource distribution we have yet devised, and works well for people with proper safeguards in place preventing accumulation of too much wealth and ensuring the welfare of the average citizen.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 14 hours ago

Then for people who are struggling & can’t afford to produce one “high value” child they make a logical choice to do it later when they have more resources. Since humans are complicated they can create other values they see are more valuable then children or decide to do something later until having children is no longer a possibility.

In your language, we would expect people in the first sentence to revert to K type parents. If they do not, they simply fall into the category described by your second sentence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

And in rich countries, who are the people still having many children? The poor, uneducated, rural, religious/conservative segments of the population, who believe in some way or another that raising a child struggling in poverty is preferable to not having children at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

I honestly wouldn't peg you as conservative, even with your "conservative" views. You sound like a reasonable moderate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

If that were true, we would expect richer countries to have higher birth rates. Instead, we see roughly the opposite trend. The richer a country gets, typically, the lower the birth rate. You can't tell me that a teacher and a data entry clerk in Virginia are less economically capable of raising children than subsistence farmers in Malawi, no matter how high the rent in Virginia is.

If you want to see high income places with high birth rates, then you end up in very traditional/religious cultures, like Mormons and the Arab petro-states, where women face extremely high cultural pressure (if not force/violence) to be child-bearers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Some books I enjoyed when I was a kid that didn't fit the trips above:

  • The Contender
  • The Tripod Series
  • Call It Courage
[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

Imma go out on a limb and say wanting someone to shove their cock up your ass is gay. Which is fine. You do you. But, like, it's gay.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

I'd really like to see the evidence for this statement, since it really seems like this trend is just an extension of the phenomenon we see in poorer countries: when you give women education, opportunities, and birth control, fewer of them will have children. It stands to reason that the more education, the more opportunities available, and the more freely accessible birth control is, the fewer women will have children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Me, but I have no dogs and don't play video games.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Tribalism. They'll find a way to think Trump is good, because that is a necessity for tribal membership for them.

view more: next ›