what would you want to see
Decisions via Loomio or a forum software. Absence of the tyranny of the internet call meetings to decide. Async, written, centralized. Obviously can be made a call for people who have hard time reading long text on a screen but main discussion and main votes should always be async and not mic quality etc gatekept...
Does it add them to "hidden posts" like voyager does or just hides them via app? Because I don't like to put to hidden posts every post I read, I just want to not visualize them in the client
Lobsters and hackernews.
Lemmy and piefed can be deviated into being used as a single sub instance as an alternative but it's just not the same.
Other than this, we are pretty fine with the basics, it would be nice to have more people working towards letting mods be mods with proper tools without involving CLI.
Also some combo like local first acting as a PDS being able to be written by different softwares. (Basically atproto or solid yes)(yes silverpill and holos are working on this but 2 different people working on 2 different implementation of the hardest thing in the fedi doesn't seem optimal for a network made of devs lol)
Protocolli diversi.
Atproto spacchetta un server mastodon in praticamente più parti:
Questo permette di avere una singola identità con una singola fonte dei propri dati ma usando diversi servizi senza preoccuparsi che vadano down.
Eurosky sta iniziando a tirare sù diversi servizi che copiano l'infrastruttura di Bluesky ma ad essere onesti non ce ne sarebbe bisogno. Se anche morissero grandi parti della rete finché ci sono i PDS e chi risolve l'identità il resto sticazzi
Problema di atproto rispetto a activitypub: per ora è tutto pubblico
Ma stanno lavorando diverse persone a permissioned Spaces etc
Oh wait, apparently not on Lemmyml but yes on slrpnk
@poVoq@slrpnk.net is it something about us? Lol
Ellipsis get rendered as flying points...
Originally, solarpunk was to talk only about solarpunk itself
Basically solarpunk theory
Why do you think this is a solarpunk approach to governance? Are there examples that work like that? What could go wrong? And so on to give it more depth and not just be a "news" link
Only half agree here. I get the low effort posting issue but it's not like I expect every solarpunk to explain every win every post. It's like saying "add why do you think it's solarpunk if someone stops Israel". Anticapitalism is one of the basic values of solarpunk as much as not liking genocide, racism and so on.
It's also true that it's much easier to spot a genocide rather than the practicalities of capitalism...
wow, that is ugly
Cannot seem to find it that spokesperson is still working for them tho
I don't have LinkedIn access so if someone can...
We kinda agree I think. But we see differently what I posted probably. It's true that it's not about the tech itself but the development of tech; at the same time, licenses and engineering won't build solarpunk alone...
I would ban news from almost the whole server to be honest, I just don't see this as one but more like a communication from me to other solarpunks to say "yo people we've got another tech foundation we can use to not give money to capitalism"
In the latest rework of lemmini before the shutdown I just reimagined the main community as a solarpunk hackernews to ease this
It's a lot more than domains and it's still a tech company turning more anticapitalist
Selfhosting should be more for mutual help
But again, you know I intended slrpnk kinda differently so maybe I'm wrong compared to present times lol
Everyone is welcome to discuss things on !piefed_dev@piefed.social , the Zulip or Matrix groups.
yes, but we would go back to having more sources of truth that are heavier on the devs, even because of the repetitions and scattering of the same topics
why do you take single part of my message and answer to them like they are not part of the whole message blaze :(
first i said that single source of truth etc and then i pointed out that the single source has not to be dev oriented, don't answer to my second point with the issue of the first point
Deactivitating issues there would hide visibility on the work being done and planned
that is not true, there are a lot of kanbans and ticketing software that can be used; to be fair, i should have said deactivating the possibility to open and comment except by mantainers
and in the system i proposed, you could still join and comment issues and features on piefed anyway (if you are not one of the piefed people)
