They are not anti-LLM, otherwise they wouldn't have said about running llm the solarpunk way.

I agree on your point, if they just stated "I think that making it with an llm is a problem because xyz" I wouldn't have answered that. Identity politics is very much in the how not in the what you believe in.

We are on a solarpunk forum, if we don't talk about technology and politics with nuance where the hell can we do it? The rest of the internet is already full of low context low effort answers; OP tried to improve the funding situation for supposedly good orgs, we should be criticizing if the approach is right etc, not just shooting a "oh traces of llm then why do u use llm?"

Edit: actually asking "why" would have still been better instead of the lowkey "llms pollute"

A datacenter can be a way to optimize load (even balancing with sun presence with solar panels) and also can be made environmentally fine. Can you make "war" and "fossil fuels" the right way? Nope, at all. There is no good war and no good burning fossil fuels. And to be honest even lithium extraction is not exactly fine right now.

Also, your choice of language makes you sound like a regressive neoliberal.

Again, don't bring identity politics into solarpunk. Keep it confined to USA, you are doing great.

I would suggest not calling it "tinder for" because tinder nature is strictly predatory :P

But I do have your project in my lists because it's for sure a nice application even if I think that the mean is not enough to drive the mission. Basically having a much easier interface to vote (instead of other democratic interfaces) is cool but the hard part will still be to have people thinking that it's worth to donate to a fund

Said that, do you accept donations and projects and votes from all over the world or there are geolocalized only sides?

Don't bring identity politics into solarpunk spaces please.

Instead stick to criticizing the approach to the problem if it creates more troubles than helping, please :)

what would you want to see

Decisions via Loomio or a forum software. Absence of the tyranny of the internet call meetings to decide. Async, written, centralized. Obviously can be made a call for people who have hard time reading long text on a screen but main discussion and main votes should always be async and not mic quality etc gatekept...

Does it add them to "hidden posts" like voyager does or just hides them via app? Because I don't like to put to hidden posts every post I read, I just want to not visualize them in the client

Lobsters and hackernews.

Lemmy and piefed can be deviated into being used as a single sub instance as an alternative but it's just not the same.

Other than this, we are pretty fine with the basics, it would be nice to have more people working towards letting mods be mods with proper tools without involving CLI.

Also some combo like local first acting as a PDS being able to be written by different softwares. (Basically atproto or solid yes)(yes silverpill and holos are working on this but 2 different people working on 2 different implementation of the hardest thing in the fedi doesn't seem optimal for a network made of devs lol)

Protocolli diversi.

Atproto spacchetta un server mastodon in praticamente più parti:

• identità
• dati
• aggregazione
• feed
• moderazione

Questo permette di avere una singola identità con una singola fonte dei propri dati ma usando diversi servizi senza preoccuparsi che vadano down.

Eurosky sta iniziando a tirare sù diversi servizi che copiano l'infrastruttura di Bluesky ma ad essere onesti non ce ne sarebbe bisogno. Se anche morissero grandi parti della rete finché ci sono i PDS e chi risolve l'identità il resto sticazzi

Problema di atproto rispetto a activitypub: per ora è tutto pubblico

Ma stanno lavorando diverse persone a permissioned Spaces etc

Oh wait, apparently not on Lemmyml but yes on slrpnk

@poVoq@slrpnk.net is it something about us? Lol

Ellipsis get rendered as flying points...

Originally, solarpunk was to talk only about solarpunk itself

Basically solarpunk theory

Why do you think this is a solarpunk approach to governance? Are there examples that work like that? What could go wrong? And so on to give it more depth and not just be a "news" link

Only half agree here. I get the low effort posting issue but it's not like I expect every solarpunk to explain every win every post. It's like saying "add why do you think it's solarpunk if someone stops Israel". Anticapitalism is one of the basic values of solarpunk as much as not liking genocide, racism and so on.

It's also true that it's much easier to spot a genocide rather than the practicalities of capitalism...