this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
1091 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

7927 readers
2341 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Giving everyone 5k would more meaningfully improve birth rates than asking educated young people worried about their future childrens' standard of living to take a leap for the cost of one small medical emergency.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I can't tell if sarcasm or not. But no this won't do anything.

Russia/Asian countries do this already it has barely any effect at all. Again it comes down to both money and culture. Can't throw money at a problem without changing the culture you're just half assing it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

5000 is genuinely nothing when it comes to raising a child.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

How the fuck much are they making that it is still worth it after taking $40k off the top?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

It's probably in NYC or San Fran if that's for one kid. Both parents could reasonably make 100-200k around there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Sadly, I could see this convincing people desperate enough for cash...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

Those poor fucking kids.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I saw ads before Christmas incentivizing people to refinance car loans and get cash in hand :<

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Do we get to choose how it’s distributed? Here are some fun options I came up with.

  1. $13.69 per day for a year. (Nice). About $419/month. Maybe they could round up to $420 because they stale internet meme culture is hip

  2. $0.76 per day for 18 years. A guaranteed $22.80 per month for an entire childhood

  3. $5000 lump sum. I can’t find any widely accepted figures for average out of pocket cost of prenatal care, child birth, and infant health visits. I’ll wild ass guess it a at covering 20-75% of those visits for people who have insurance. For people without insurance, looks like an uncomplicated vaginal birth averages $14k. But again huge variations in price

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He is rich and has no reference for the price of everyday items

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

It's one year of daycare, Michael. What could it cost? $5000?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Think of how many bananas you could buy with $5k.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

What's a baby cost? $5,000?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Only among the very stupid

So half the population

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

But the orange leader said that tariffs will pay for child care

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (9 children)

What’s stopping communal childcare from becoming a thing again? This is how working parents did it for thousands of years.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The grandparents who would have been available to watch the children are still working at 65 because they can't afford to retire.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Well luckily this won’t be a problem since we won’t have the money, space of career stability to have kids until we’re 40 anyway. By then they’ll have no choice but to retire.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I imagine a mix of the already diminished size of extended family units, and the liability implications if it's outside your own family unit.

You're essentially just describing an unlicensed daycare if it's not a family member, and those exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›