cyberblob

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it irrelevant though?

Lets take it to an extreme: Imagine in Gaza there would be a Nazi regime. Nazis who hate trans people and want them dead. Nazis living there with their families, innocent children etc.

I Understand that it would be worthwhile stopping war actions on all those innocent souls, but would I actively advocate for the Nazi party ruling this imaginary Gaza strip? Certainly not.

Hence, get your act together. Support an end of the war on Gaza, support innocent people. Dont support Hamas!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Wow, keep your emotions at bay, will you?

Not even sure what to respond, except for what I wrote previously: A lot of discourse is broken by calling people whatever and not listening.

You are somewhat setting an example of what I am talking about, since I am not even disagreeing with the opinion that I am infering from your writing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Voting is boring. Just comment yourself. Thats much better. We want content and discussions, Not just numbers;)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I totally agree with your message.

These days everyone who is not ultra-left easily gets labelled as Nazi, similarly everyone who brings up any rather left argument will be called a woke snowflake.

Thus, any dialog is immediately shut down. Listen, understand, exchange arguments.

That is what unites everyone who believes in liberal values.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Well they did not want to and they evidently did not.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I am not even sure why as a trans person one wants to support an islamic-extremist and authoritarian organization like Hamas. Honestly, I dont get it.

I mean yeah I dont want to make a case of supporting the other side either. But just think would rather wants you dead, Israel, or Hamas? I think I pretty much know the answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

After Reading additional sources it seems very much certain that they were not just some innocent bystanders:

[…] Zu den vermummten Personen sollen Kasia W. aus Polen, Cooper L. aus den USA, Shane O. und Roberta M. aus Irland gehört haben. Die vier beteiligten sich an mehreren propalästinensischen Aktionen.

[…] The masked individuals are said to have included Kasia W. from Poland, Cooper L. from the USA, Shane O. and Roberta M. from Ireland. The four took part in several pro-Palestinian actions.

„The masked individuals“ refers to those with the axes.

(https://www.zeit.de/campus/2025-04/abschiebung-berlin-propaleastina-protest-usa)

Hence, I kindly decline your request. Obviously, I agree that there should be strong evidence for all of this. Lets see if they have any.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I agree from a moral standpoint but from the perspective of efficient rebuilding I disagree.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Surprise?

I mean, who else would have been able to run the government, when most people with the required skills were also associated with the Former system.

Americans deliberately counted on the expertise of former Nazis. Thats not news and actually not very shocking.

And discrimination against gays was more of a Zeitgeist thing. E.g. Being gay was a Crime in france until 1982.

 

Hey fellow humans,

I just recently discovered Lemmy. I had an understanding of the general existence of the "Fediverse" for some time, but never gave it much thought. Over the past months or so I read a lot on Reddit and by shear accident discovered Lemmy during that time, as a more federated, free alternative to big-corp Reddit.

Do not get me wrong. I am not per se opposed to big corporations. I am a bit more critical with those corporations that are mainly involved with information and data processing, so basically big-tech.

Now here I am, freshly registered to a german instance and I wanted to share my first impressions of Lemmy or the "Lemmy network".

First off, Lemmy seems great. It has a nice and clean UI and its easy to understand.

But, tbh I already had a bad feeling when it came to choosing an instance to register to. Will I be basically at the mercy of whoever runs that server (with what I am allowed to say at least locally)? What happens when that person or group decides to shut down the server over night? Will my account still be valid elsewhere? How does this work?

One could argue, well what happens when Reddit turns off their website; And of course on Reddit I am also at the mercy of moderators; From a single user perspective there always seems to be the single point of failure in both alternatives. But from my experience, "money makes the world go round", meaning: If there is a legitimate business case it is more likely that such a website or instance will stay online, whereas a lonesome enthusiast will likely loose interest after a while. And then its all gone (at least for that instance)? Is Lemmy than a sub-optimal Reddit alternative?

After registration I noticed something additionally "disturbing". There seems to be a big divide in the Lemmy community, as the instances are free to block certain instances. And I read here, about how big this problem apparently is. Hence, it is not about a big blocklist for unwanted instances, it is also about general focus of conversations across instances.

In fact, this puts me again at the mercy of any instance administrator what I am allowed to see or interact with. Is that not a contradiction of a rather free and open network? It appears anti-liberal in some sense. And a liberal digital society is what we would all strive for, I guess?

Ultimately, this would mean I would have to run my own instance to avoid the risk attached to this situation. But the extreme case of that would be that we are all running our own instances. That does not make sense at all. Then everyone runs and instance and we are all more or less blocking each other.

I guess there is no clean way of doing this? And in the end platforms like Lemmy are always formed by the people who drive them. Hence, personal opinions will always play a role.

But I think a liberal real life society goes to show how things should be: There are rules, but freedom of speech is very much emphasized. For me ideal communication involves that everyone can speak their mind. But then, there are certainly somewhere limits.

I am all against safe spaces, but I am pretty much for respectfulness, indulgence, fairness and constructive dispute. I do not fear any argument that is told in the pursuit of having an honest conversation, an exchange of arguments and ideas.

I would even say, when we are hindering ourselves of having this kind of honest dispute, we are loosing our developed societies.

On the other hand (like in the real world) simply insulting people should not be tolerated.

So, I wonder, is this place actually for me, apparently as a rather liberal person?

Is Lemmy liberal enough from your perspective?

Do you have insights or answers with regards to my questions or blind spots?

Thank you in advance and see you around!

view more: next ›