this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
212 points (92.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4808 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Thursday dubbed the House Freedom Caucus the “burn-it-all-down caucus,” a swipe at the conservative group that ousted her from its ranks over the summer.

“I’m not a member of the burn-it-all-down caucus anymore,” Greene told reporters. “I’m a greatly, very happily a free agent and I want to do my job here.”

Members of the caucus voted to boot Greene from their ranks over the summer after the Georgia Republican supported the debt limit bill that Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and President Biden crafted to avoid a default, which drew ire from many in the right flank — some of whom are members of the caucus.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"I'm a free agent, and I want to do my job for the highest bidder."

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

I mean, can we pay her to do it right? I know we're already doing that, but can we pretend to bribe her and yoink away the giant check right before she takes it? Like this
Lucy van Pelt makes Charlie Brown trip by removing the football at the last moment in comical fashion

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the 'Sinema Doctrine'!

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... says the woman seeking a retaliatory impeachment of Biden...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

And telling states to secede. It doesn’t get much more “burning it down” than that.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

When you’re too crazy for the crazies…

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I really hate every picture of her. It is so frustrating trying to square how weird she looks with how much power she holds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Her eyes are too close together and her cheek bones are too big and high, which only embellishes how close together her eyes are. That's why she looks so weird.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She's a capybara in fancy clothes.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Whoa, whoa! That's extremely offensive! Capybaras are the most chill, and lliked creatures on the planet!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Capybaras don't give a fuck if you're trans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Janice apparently had quite the personality change after she left the Electric Mayhem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there is no effective therapy for her personality.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shock Therapy has entered the ring.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The shock of being pushed into a wood chipper therapy has entered the room also.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

She needs to seek resignation

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Therapy? She needs institutionalized mental healthcare. Where she is supervised 24/7.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

There's no fixing that level of malignant narcissism. The people of the world need to be protected from her.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does she think free is a synonym for Russian?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's not a member of the Burn It All Down Caucus. Now she's a Burn It All Down free agent. Much better, right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She's an equal opportunity burn it downer now. Hate for hire, if you will.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...because they kicked me out. Seriously, who thinks she wouldn't still be a member otherwise...?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Exactly. She's being rejected because she's MTG.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She's close, but the Republican party is the burn it all down party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

What "job" would that be, Marge? Pretend you're on The Jerry Springer Show? Do and say the most offensive, repulsive, and provocative things you can think of for attention?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is there a single more stupid bitch?

Genuinely, I want to know, because I don’t think there is

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I genuinely did not realize this wasn't boebert.. Apparently it's easy to conflate the amount of stupid going on...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Right, this is the one who got into an argument with Boebert about which of them got to file impeachment charges. And, somehow, both of them got reelected after their first term where they were... them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well. yes. Yes it is. I have to constantly ask myself "which one is this again".... and then I find myself asking, why do I even care. They're both idiots. they're both annoying, and they're both both a symptom and a cause...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Can we criticize even shitty people without resorting to sexist remarks please? Lemmy feels like it should be above that kinda language. Call her a turd or whatever 💩

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s always disappointing to see people who think themselves reasonable delighting in the usage of slurs when given the opportunity to tear down someone they perceive as disliked by their community. It is much more damning to them than the object of their ire.

Greene is a symptom of the cancer metastasized on our civilization, but deploying gendered slurs against her is counterproductive and pitiful.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the attacks on appearance for me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pointless ones. She looks like a normal person. That she's got an infection of fascist brain worms is something you can call out directly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know... she looks like she has crazy eyes to me. I don't think that's sexist. I can think of plenty of crazy men with the similar look in their eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

She knows exactly what she's doing. She's telling the stupid and hateful exactly what they want to hear, and she's getting all that fantastic attention she craves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they doing a human centipede and eating each other alive, asshole first?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That would be an oroboros.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

She’s part of the “I’m tryna not get arrested for the next step of craziness” crowd publicly but still part of it privately.

They’re realizing they don’t actually have backing and are hiding again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Burn it all up then?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

A free agent of Russia she means

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Nah, don't be fooled. Still a terrorist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Members of the caucus voted to boot Greene from their ranks over the summer after the Georgia Republican supported the debt limit bill that Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and President Biden crafted to avoid a default, which drew ire from many in the right flank — some of whom are members of the caucus.

Greene called Boebert a “little b—-” after the Colorado Republican unexpectedly forced a vote on her articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

Greene criticized Boebert for not explaining her decision to the House GOP conference, and she said her Colorado colleague copied her articles of impeachment targeting Mayorkas.

The Georgia Republican came to Congress in 2021 as a rabble rouser, quickly becoming a conservative thorn in the side of GOP leadership.

Greene on Thursday suggested in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that she would not support the spending bill because it includes funding for Ukraine, which she opposes.

In July, after news broke of Greene’s ouster from the Freedom Caucus, the congresswoman called the group “the drama club.”


The original article contains 489 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›