183
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago

Protesting is cool and all but have you considered that 1000 people is more than enough to drag him out of his house and give him the no-fash treatment?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

And then get mass executed by the national guard

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

They should sacrifice themselves for me, the brave poster

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Or you know: the mother and children that were kidnapped. And everyone else.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The issue that I have is with people who sit back and say "WHY AREN'T YOU DOING [CRIME]" without doing crime themselves. And I know they aren't doing it because nobody is killing ICE agents.

If you have a criticism of the insufficiency of action, it better be made from within the movement, and you better be building the sort of structures that can actually carry out more radical action.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago

These people in power forget that they, too, have names and addresses. They’ll likely have to send the whole town to El Salvador.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Which is why you've got to make them too afraid to. Which waving signs doesn't do. So, then...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Names and addresses call for a sternly written postcard. Or something.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

this will be the most lib thing i will ever comment here (for now) but intimidation is power too. knowing the vast majority of the population of your hometown is ready to stand around in your yard shouting at you, to the guy being shouted at, can be pretty scary.

it's the implicit threat of violence that comes with those kinds of overwhelming numbers. it's a first step to the application of such.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Demonstration and rally are military terms, even if libs have forgotten

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yep. it's a show of force. it's saying "imagine us all here but we brought weapons instead". you don't have enough bullets to stop us

the ruling class, especially this current one (and the last) are legit terrified of even these shitty lib protests.

there's a reason Clearview is trying to catalog everyone there for eventual elimination by deputized death squads, Luckey's murder-drones, and ICE black bag teams.

they understand that even if it's just a bunch of sleepy boomers with brunch signs there is that implicit threat behind it

Fun Fact: during the Insurrection of 10 August 1792 in France elite, heavily armed Swiss Guards (the best of the best, equivilant to modern SOCOM) were literally overwhelmed and torn to pieces by bare hands, cleavers, and picks. they fought with the best tactics available to them, had access to unlimited stores of ammo, and each regiment covered one in front as they did an orderly retreat in a familiar, fortified palace.

it didn't help them.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Fun Fact: during the Insurrection of 10 August 1792 in France elite, heavily armed Swiss Guards (the best of the best, equivilant to modern SOCOM) were literally overwhelmed and torn to pieces by bare hands, cleavers, and picks. they fought with the best tactics available to them, had access to unlimited stores of ammo, and each regiment covered one in front as they did an orderly retreat in a familiar, fortified palace.

awesome

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

French wave tactics

[-] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

Protesting does nothing. Do something more you damn libs!

[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

Just based on the numbers, it seems like there would be a solution that would, historically, be enacted by the large group of people against the lone, evil, tyrant.

Oh well. Fun Sunday, see you at brunch tomorrow, we really made the world a better place today.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

I am of similar opinion, but not so harsh - what would you suggest they do?

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

At a minimum? burn the house down.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What's stopping you from going and doing it?

I just don't think it's fair to scorn liberals for attempting to do something, then suggesting something you realistically wouldn't do yourself.

Realistically their options are to bombard ICE inboxes, blockade the house, maybe get away with some vandalism, but I don't think you can realistically expect people to burn a senior government official's house down - as much as it may be deserved.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

What’s stopping you from going and doing it?

One person is significantly easier to kill or imprison than a thousand. What I would hypothetically be willing to do [in the video game World of Warcraft] as part of a 1000 person raid is very different than what I would be willing to do as an individual.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well, true, but that's an enormous hypothetical, and not really a realistic course of action. Even in that hypothetical, if a mob of 1000 people started firebombing government officials house, the police and then the national guard would deploy and start shooting. And who begins the raid? There needs to be someone to make the first move, without surefire knowing that 1000 people are about to back them up.

Next time you're at a protest see how you feel about throwing a Molotov - let alone throwing one at a government official. I've been in crowds where people have done so little as lobbing bottles, and that crowd immediately got kettled by armed and mounted police, and the people who threw it got singled out, dragged out, and put in the van.

Militancy happens when people's lives are made utterly miserable. That's why militancy happens in exploited countries. That's why trade unionists and anti racist groups were militant in the 20s-70's in America, but not anymore. The conditions don't necessitate it right now, and it's not yet a rational response to risk your life. It seems like those conditions will come back, but it hasn't happened yet. If that time had come already, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

idk i think the crowd of 1000 is the bigger ask, if you've already got the numbers might as well do the cool thing

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Paint bomb ICE windshields if you see them. Gives more time to gather crowds at attempted abductions.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

An Ocean is stopping me. Don't tell me what I would and wouldn't do. What about you? What's stopping you?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you're willing to sacrifice everything and end up in prison in the US for a long time, a one way flight is no barrier. If I were to get an 'on-the-day' flight, it could cost me less than $400, which is not a hard sum to make if you don't plan on having any future commitments or a need to save up. Its an ocean between me and the US too, but it's not the ocean that's stopping me, it's the fact that I am not willing to ruin my life for a cause that would forget me in no time at all. That's the case for you too. Stop larping.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

If you're willing to sacrifice everything and end up in prison in the US for a long time, a one way flight is no barrier.

I have talked to a lot of people who are, perhaps not by their own words, but to some degree of self admitting, they are basically one financial hardship away from having nothing to lose. They might also be struggling with alienation of daily life working pointless jobs. Some people know that, statistically speaking, the financial mishap is coming, that the current regime is actively removing safety nets. Some people may want to reclaim some autonomy in their lives and get ahead of the bleak future. Some people already have nothing to lose.

For somebody in such a situation, in mainstream populism in the US, Luigi sits at the right side of the throne, and the left side is an open seat. It's perhaps delusional to think someone could successfully pull off an act that would earn you the left seat in the court of public opinion, but people have gone to prison for dumber reasons. But there are a lot of people who are ready to commit a crime, they just lack knowledge of an opportunity to commit one.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Sure, but it's not happening yet. I think there's still some ways to go before adventurism years begin.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Okay, Good luck changing nothing then, bozo.

I will be over where I am, doing stuff in the meantime.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Big words coming from someone evidently not engaging in the acts of revolutionary terrorism that they advocate others to do...

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

You won’t and wouldn’t do a thing. safe an ocean away typing on your little keyboard

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Awww, such a strong poster you are! Feeling the need to weigh in with your very important opinion, are we? Good job! Good job posting! Such a good poster you are! Yes you are!

There, more love than you deserve. Now go away and don't be a bother.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

lol more tip tapping on your little keyboard all safe what a surprise

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

What’s stopping you from going and doing it?

gas prices

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
183 points (100.0% liked)

news

24157 readers
676 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS