spoilerCalifornia Governor Gavin Newsom said he has directed his administration to "look at new opportunities to expand trade" as he tries to steer his state around President Donald Trump's sprawling import tariffs. What To Know

In a post on X, Newsom addressed the U.S.'s global trading partners, writing "California is here and ready to talk."

It comes after a Fox News report revealed that Newsom is directing his state to pursue "strategic" relationships with countries announcing retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., urging them to exclude California-made products from those taxes.

In response, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Fox News: "Gavin Newsom should focus on out-of-control homelessness, crime, regulations, and unaffordability in California instead of trying his hand at international dealmaking."

On Wednesday, the White House imposed a 10 percent baseline tariff on all imports, including those from U.S. allies and non-economically active regions, along with higher rates for countries with large trade surpluses against the U.S. on Wednesday.

The tariffs include a 34 percent tax on imports from China, a 20 percent tax on imports from the European Union, 25 percent on South Korea, 24 percent on Japan and 32 percent on Taiwan. Mexico and Canada, from which most U.S. produce imports come, are exempt from Trump's latest tariffs, but the 25 percent tariffs that Trump levied on both countries last month will remain intact.

Trump's announcement sent the markets into turmoil on Thursday, with Wall Street recording its worst day since 2020, when Covid-19 was in full swing. Meanwhile, China hit back with a 34 percent retaliatory tariff on Friday, in the first signs of an all-out trade war that could cripple imports and exports. Other nations are now also mulling over retaliatory tariffs.

Amid the turmoil, the Newsom administration is concerned that California's almond industry, a key agricultural exporter, could lose billions of dollars, as countries like China, India, and the European Union impose retaliatory tariffs, Fox News reported.

A Newsom official also told Fox News that the new Trump tariffs will hinder access to essential supplies, like construction materials, needed to rebuild after the Los Angeles wildfires. The U.S. currently imposes a 14 percent duty on Canadian lumber, with the rate possibly rising to nearly 27 percent this year.

State officials also expressed concern that retaliatory tariffs will cause significant disruptions to supply chains between California and Baja, arguing that taxing goods each time they cross the border will raise final product prices, ultimately impacting Californians.

Why It Matters

California, the world's fifth-largest economy, plays a crucial role in driving U.S. economic growth. As the largest importer and second-largest exporter among U.S. states, with over $675 billion in two-way trade, it holds significant economic influence. Therefore, Trump's tariffs could have a major impact, potentially increasing costs for California businesses, disrupting global supply chains, and putting pressure on vital industries within the state.

What Happens Next

Trump's tariffs are set to go into effect between April 5 and April 9.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 1 year ago

BALKANIZE LETS GOOOOO

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    doubt Gavin has no juice, he just wants to ride the line of "performatively defying Trump" and "pandering to transphobes" in the run up to 2028.

    If a Republican governor was saying this about a Democrat president, I'd believe it. They will flagrantly break the law if they can get away with it. There's nothing Newsom can legally do to get around tariffs, he just wants a headline. And Democrats will always follow procedures if it means that the poor will get hurt.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    legally

    liberals without power and liberals making excuses for not upholding principles don't break laws. liberals pursuing their interests will, they do not have a fundamentally different ideology from republicans. there are powerful capital interests in california that would love to be immune from the tarriff regime. let the grusome gentleman cook

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe, but the article title is misleading. He never said he wanted to skirt tariffs, he said he wanted to expand with trading partners. That's vague liberal speak and that usually means "do nothing."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    it's euphemistic but whether that's in service of being empty words, or avoiding the terminology that'd make it unconstitutional is unclear. he's a real ghoul's ghoul there's a chance he could've gotten calls on his CEO phones and is trying to deal on their behalf

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 63 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    See, this is the smart way to take performative action. Just go on TV and lie! Nobody will call you on it! You don't need to talk for 24 hours, or shit in a bucket, or anything!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    do-something c'mon balkanize

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago

    wtf i love states' rights now

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's hilarious that he thinks any foreigner loves California enough to exclude them from retaliatory tariffs

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think any foreign government would be ecstatic to undermine the current regime's dwindling legitimacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That would be really funny but I don't think China likes to meddle in other countries' internal affairs that way, and I don't think European countries have the balls to do that sort of thing (although I guess I could be wrong about that)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    California? You mean the progressive, melting pot bastion with the world’s 4th largest economy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    I liked it when the progressive state legislature didn't even bring a progressive single payer healthcare bill to a vote because they knew they would all have to publicly vote against it, progressively. That was very progressive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    "progressive" state which elected Arnold Schwarzenegger, the same "progressive" state which hates the homeless and has unaffordable housing, the "progressive" state with a Governor who invites right-wingers on his podcast like Bannon and Kirk.

    "4th largest economy" is also a stretch since most of it is in difficult to measure services sector.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    would love to see how much of California's "economy" is straight landlordism, VC bullshit/silicon valley scam banking, crypto, rent-seeking intellectual property licensing, and Hollywood accounting hoovering up tax breaks and public art supports from far flung geographies for filming on location for a week somewhere.

    they throw their weight around a lot as being some kind of engine of economic activity (or cradle of innovation LMAO), but I think if you pull back the curtain, it's like 10 guys standing in a circle reaching into each other's pockets, double counting every "trade" while looting every public dollar and stomping the guts out of the broke motherfuckers trapped in the vortex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago*

    would love to see how much of California's "economy" is straight landlordism, VC bullshit/silicon valley scam banking, crypto, rent-seeking intellectual property licensing, and Hollywood accounting hoovering up tax breaks and public art supports from far flung geographies for filming on location for a week somewhere.

    the remaining 20% is oil

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    I mean, if Texas is gonna take immigration into its own hands and ignore the feds, turnabout is fair play.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    states rights come and take them skeleton-guns-akimbo

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    the boys will soon be talking about paladins, HIMARs, and howitzers at their next fantasy football gambling sessions

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think we could have a legit secession movement in California if there were an organized group that could become the government. Newscum ain't it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately, while California does have one of the strongest economies in the world, there is something that global trade can't address: Water.

    Most of California's water comes from rivers that flow from out of state. It would be really easy to destroy a hypothetical independent California by disrupting water flow from the east.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    simply conquer or pacify those watersheds

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Yeah an independent California wouldn't allow this weakness to exist they would take it or lose independence trying. It's existential.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    California preparing for secession.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Critical support to Gruesome Newscum's balkanization efforts.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Send in the tanks, Donny.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago*

    Fuck yeah, you know what to do next newsom, secession from the union.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Cool and all, but uhhh…..I better see California fucking apologize for all the shit the Silicon Valley did to the whole country.

    As if one Wall Street was bad enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    The biggest treatler state to avoid treatler tax

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    My wish junk gonna be hitting clean

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›