this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
271 points (85.9% liked)

/0 Governance

138 readers
6 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The Lemmy Club is currently suffering from "The Nazi Bar" problem. All of their top communities are run by three right-wingers as illustrated below.

The Lemmy Club instance admin doesn't seem to want to ban them, for the reasons mentioned below:

This vote is on whether or not we should defederate from this instance until they address their Nazi Bar problem.

Upvote = for defederation. Downvote = against defederation.

Edit: As others have mentioned, happy to treat this a only a temporary measure until the problem is resolved.

Edit 2: The Lemmy Club admin has said they will implement a rule against right wing communities, and has taken action on some problematic posts and users (see original comments below).

I'm willing to extend the benefit of the doubt to the admin here, as they have responded in good faith:

If you implement those changes then I’d be willing to withdraw the defederation proposal and consider the problem resolved.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 days ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago) (7 children)

Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591 Early Bird: a parrot, orangered colors Jolly Roger: an icon of pirate jolly roger skull wearing a hat, in orange-red, black and white colors A book with a loaf of bread in the cover  in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color

This is a simple majority vote. The current tally is as follows:

  • For: First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color (4), Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors (3), Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors (1), Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color (8)
  • Against:
  • Local Community: +0.8
  • Outsider sentiment: Supportive
  • Total: +16.8
  • Percentage: 100.00%

This vote will complete in 1 days


Reminder that this is a pilot process and results of voting are not set in stone.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

These images are insane on my mobile Connect app. it's eight screen lengths of scrolling to get to the reply button just for this one comment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

yo need to contact the developer of you app and ask them to handle and resize lemmy emojis properly. They can be identified by their markdown code as they all have a special emoji string assigned like so "emoji vouched"

This is how they look on tesseract:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is how it looks like on the web-UI via Tor Browser (Android)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Alexandrite (zoomed out to 0.25%):

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bdonvr 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If I have to choose between this user and federation with db0 I would side with db0.

However I must comment frankly that moving immediately to defederation over a thread in which the subject - @[email protected] - has never been the subject of db0 moderation action (with over 4k combined comments and posts over 6 months) in some attempt to strongarm me into action is, at minimum, distasteful.

Trust me, I'm a card carrying Communist party member. I do not care for conservative views at all. But I did not create The Lemmy Club to be a partisan instance - but a general instance to replace reddit. I do of course have limits, however in reviewing the posting history of @[email protected] I do not find anything worthy of banning. I do not like some of the sources they post. But they also post non-conservative stories and sources as well and generally conduct themselves in a reasonable manner in all posts and comments. They do not appear to me to be some wild-MAGA idiot, although they do seem to be conservative. They post unfavorable things about Trump fairly often. The fact that it has come to this is to me, a bit bizarre.

Thanks for having this open to outside comments, though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The problem is all your top communities are run by these right wing guys. I know you probably don't want to have to trawl through every post, and neither do I. But shit attracts flies.

You should be made aware, for example, that the user who posted this https://thelemmy.club/post/23635160 and this https://thelemmy.club/post/23387257 in "Right Wing Videos" is a literal neo-nazi (see his Mastadon post profile here: https://friends.ravergram.club/@Bernard). I'm sure if we dig around some more there will be many more examples.

Unfortunately we can see where things are headed because we already had to deal with instances like exploding heads. I think that, while the mods themselves seem well behaved enough to not get reported, they are effectively acting as cover for the more unsavoury characters that right wing instances invariably attract.

Unless you want to spend all your time checking those communities, I just think you're better off without them. You are right that jumping straight to a defed vote is a bit harsh maybe, but I think if we just blocked the communities then there would be no real pressure on you to take any further action, and personally I think it would be better for the fediverse to not have right wing content platformed.

[–] bdonvr 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Okay now see this stuff is actionable, Forgive me for not noticing this earlier, I did not know about these documentaries by name, and being that they were zero point, zero comment posts with no reports I had not seen it. The (non Lemmy Club) user that posted them has been banned with content removed. Additionally after some investigation site user Marathon started posting some stuff of that sort recently. Also banned them for apparently being a ban-evasion account and using their alts for vote manipulation. The communities that they moderated have been removed.

I would much prefer a report over a post like this one to fix these kind of issues. If they're posts like these were - essentially zero interaction posts that go nowhere - it's possible I may miss them.

I think I will have to make a new rule against "right wing" communities. I don't think I have the capacity to moderate them due to my own viewpoint, and I can't be hands off without risking them devolving. I won't be banning the previously mentioned user, but I will remove their communities that are conservative-themed and not allow them to moderate in such a way to only allow such sources.

I think this will address the issue.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Honestly, that all sounds quite reasonable to me, and seems like a good faith response to my original complaint. Thank you for responding in the way you did.

If you implement those changes then I'd be willing to withdraw the defederation proposal and consider the problem resolved.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bdonvr 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

@bdonvr, admin of The Lemmy Club here. I'd like to provide an update and some comments.

What went wrong:

One prolific user (realcaseyrollins) of my instance has created several communities and is usually one of the only submitters to their own communities. The posts in them generally garner very little interaction but once in a while hit some main feeds and get a few comments. One such post by this user to the (relatively) largest community, /c/[email protected], was a link to a Breitbart article. The content and headline of the article was not particularly objectionable, but as one user pointed out, Breitbart is a terrible news source whose use should be discouraged. The aforemenioned moderator of the community removed the comment citing a rule they had: "Using the Poisoning The Well fallacy to attack sources shared in a post is presently not allowed (this rule may change in the future, and isolated instances will not subject you to a permanent ban)". This sparked a post to /c/yepowertrippinbastards.

I have previously checked into this user's post history and comments and although I don't agree with them politically (or in the way that they moderate), they did not appear to me to be an extreme MAGA/neo-nazi type and was otherwise reasonable in interactions with others, so I did not ban them. I saw it like this - if you don't like their little news community, use one of the many other communities on the fediverse. Such is the strength of our platform. The one moderated by this user would continue to languish in obscurity.

After some interaction with db0 staff in that thread it was pointed out to me that many of my instance's "top" communities were right-wing or adjacent to that kind of thing. This is something I was aware of and not at all fond of. I had already been debating removing several before this. The only reason I hadn't was that all of these communities were essentially dead. The posts in them barely ever got more than 2-3 votes, and comments even rarer still. I was more hoping that some more normal communities would take hold here and just drown them out. We are a very small instance. But seeing my defense of not immediately banning realcaseyrollins and the community list a db0 admin then moved to open this thread.

As realcaseyrollins was the only point of discussion so far, I made a comment saying that the issue presented thus far were not worthy of defederation talk. After some more discussion it was pointed out to me that there were two videos posted to my instance which were very much explicit neo-nazi propaganda. I had not seen these posts because they were made to the very much dead (no more than a dozen posts in it's six month history) because they garnered basically no votes, no comments, and had not been reported to me until now. I also would not have known by the title of the videos without looking into it further. The posts were made by an outside user.

What I have done to address it.

I do not tolerate nazis or their ilk, nor will I ever. The moment I was made aware of this the two posts were promptly removed and the user banned.

Furthermore I had discovered one user of my instance - @marathon - who had been posting things that weren't so explicitly awful but trending that way. After careful inspections of their posts and comments I discovered that they were ban evading from other instances and upvoting their own posts with alts. They were also banned and all of their communities were removed.

After further consideration of some of the commentary here by users and admins I decided that I could not be host to any communities that were conservative/right wing. Even if they did not reach the level of neo-nazi. I am very much a leftist. I was never comfortable with these communities but I did not create The Lemmy Club to be a partisan instance. I had not removed them to date because they were small and dead and was hoping they'd amount to nothing rather than having to foray into actively moderating on an ideological basis. Some of that is definitely naivety on my part. In theory I don't have too much of a problem with communities that aren't politically aligned with my personal views existing on my instance (to a point, of course). I made The Lemmy Club as a general instance. But I now realize, as sole admin of the site, that I can't effectively moderate any such community centered around politics that differ from my own to that extent. I can't be hands off in case it becomes more extremist either. So I have implemented a new site-wide rule: "Users or communities that, in the view of the admin team, jeopardize the good standing of The Lemmy Club with other instances may be removed.". This allows me broader, more generic power than a rule explicitly banning "right-wing" communities, and entirely avoids the debate of what constitutes "too right wing" while accomplishing the same thing. After implementing this rule I moved to remove all communities that are themed around these kinds of politics.

In addition, after seeing this thread - and with no prompting from me - realcaseyrollins has decided to voluntarily close /c/[email protected], /c/[email protected], and /c/[email protected].

I hope this addresses any concerns that you might have.

A few comments on the situation.

I started this instance because I was excited by the fediverse and wanted to contribute. I pay, personally, hundreds of dollars a year to run this site and provide space to some users in the fediverse. With the generosity of a few of my users half of my costs are now covered by them. This is something I think both the db0 team and I share, though their operation and contribution to the fediverse have been far larger than mine, which I commend. We are a very small instance. We are not pushing for growth for growths sake. I think with this in mind and the interactions you've had with me thus far have shown that I'm a reasonable person who is more than willing to engage in dialogue.

With that said I really am not fond of the way this whole situation came about. I would have very much appreciated a PM or message on Element before taking such a drastic step. I don't think that this strongarming was at all necessary. I believe such actions should follow an escalation process. The scope of the issue should be taken into account in this as well, as far as actual neo-nazi posts we're talking about two, to a dead comm, that got no interaction. A quick report and I would have immediately banned the user and removed the posts, and probably have just went ahead and removed the community as well. Or we could've continued discussion on /c/yepowertrippinbastards. Not that I have an issue addressing issues publicly, but the title of this thread will make it seem to many users (and let's face it, we're mostly ex-redditors here. Most of us read way too much into headlines and don't read further) that The Lemmy Club is some right-wing instance full of unsavory crap. I mean the governance comm on db0 has only ever had seven total posts and this is one. Gotta be pretty bad right? And that impression will not go away very easy. Just the suggestion that db0 should defederate would signal to most people that the instance is toxic and the problem quite serious and that the admins had probably already attempted dialogue that went nowhere. And that upsets me because that is not the case at all, and does actively harm this small little project that I've put in a lot of time and personal effort into. We all want to help build the fediverse. Let's work together in a constructive manner, that's all I ask.

Thanks for reading,

@bdonvr, sole admin of thelemmy.club

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for making this post. It was great to get your side of the story.

I acknowledge I pushed pretty hard on this topic, mostly because in the related YPTB post you didn't seem very open to taking action initially. We are trying to practice open governance on this instance with direct input from the community, so I thought the best thing in this case was just to ask the community to weigh in. What is telling is that, even without providing much context other than the top communities list, the vast majority of our instance members clearly already knew it was a right wing instance judging by the voting.

But to be honest, I think your reputational concerns are mostly unfounded. The way I see it, your instance already had a bad reputation for being a right-wing instance simply because of the communities and mods that set up shop there. That's kind of how this all came about. However, the way you responded to the situation has been great, and anyone reading this post would be able to see that the problem has been dealt with, and that you seem like a genuinely nice person. That can only help your instance's reputation in the long run, I would think. And now hopefully you have a fresh start.

[–] bdonvr 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm confused by your voting system. Did these not count or does that symbol mean they don't have voting rights?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

See the sidebar, specifically About voting rights and flairs. Those flairs mean those members mentioned a pirate in their application, and their votes count towards the "local community" sentiment. 100% of members with voting rights voted for defederation.

What I'm planning to do is to edit the very top of the post with a short TLDR so that anyone stumbling on the post later can see at a glance that the problem has been dealt with, and that we are not defederating from your instance. Would you be happy with that approach?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I read the comments here, starting from the perspective that merely being a "conservative" was no reason for defederation (I have a 1990s idea of what the word "conservative" means), then it turns out we're talking about people posting Nazi shit at will and it staying up, which definitelly justifies defederation and the "Nazi bar" label, but apparently (from his own participation here) the Admin of the instance is willing to ban the Nazi types and possibly the groups in that instance which were ok with Nazi posts.

If the admin does this, then I'm against defederation, if not then I'm in favour of defederation. Sadly I can't encode such a view in just a Yay or Nay metric (i.e. upvote/downvote), hence I will neither upvote nor downvote and instead am leaving my rationale here as a post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't let Nazis/Fascists into anywhere that I frequent. Defederate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago (15 children)

I'm in vote of a temporary defederation, until they address the problem. This shit is not okay, and is not a matter of just "different opinions".

[–] bdonvr 8 points 5 days ago

These users were not pointed out in this or the prior post and have now been banned. I don't tolerate that kind of stuff but these were basically zero point, zero interaction posts that had not been reported to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Firefox Fork LlibreWolf Declares Self "Very Wole"

Based.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Defederate. Zero tolerance for Nazis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Defederate.

I understand why the owner of the instance finds our reaction distasteful, but unfortunately, we have no choice but to defederate from an instance whose largest community is run by this individual.

This is a governance community, meant for decisions (such as, should we be federated with a specific instance), not a diplomacy community. We don't vote on "should we ask the owner of this instance to actually moderate in ways we find tolerable"? The unfortunate truth here is that instance is currently mostly this kind of garbage, so until it isn't, defederation.

(Also I spent an hour trawling this individual's comments to make sure of my opinion because I have ADHD and can't stop myself, and while my normal reaction is surgical, this is too conveniently a case where every individual involved could have been acting in bad faith. Better to be thorough here than not.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Defederate.

Tolerance of intolerance isn’t good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For a culture of tolerance to flourish then the intolerant must be purged. I love freedom of speech but Nazis should be given no quarter for their ideologies to metastasize into the rest of the fediverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

I would have preferred a vote first to see if we should just ban those comms, or defederate. If we ban those comms and the right-wingers, we can take a more "surgical" approach. Personally I will vote against, in favour or B&B (block & ban). But I am open to be convinced otherwise if the problem is worse than I thought.

Edit: After the revelation that there's literal neonazis posting neonazi videos in there already, I switch my vote to defed.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We don't abide by no Nazis. Defederate. Take away their bullhorn.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm for temporary defederation if the admin does not react to an ultimatum to clean house. Being federated means increasing the reach of their message, and the message is hate. If Xitter was worth banning, then this is too.

The admin seems caught in the tolerance paradoxon, and doesn't realize that his inaction is an indirect endorsement of the content he's hosting. Seems to be too nice for his own good, maybe a warning cannon salvo is in order.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

yeah, i don't want our bar connected to a nazi bar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don’t recall seeing them when scrolling through All so I wouldn’t miss them if we defederated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Defederate until the problem is solved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm from Buenos Aires, and I say defed them all!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Defederate. If they get better, they can have a second chance. If they don't, no skin off my balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I think temporary defederation is sensible.

Sure, you dbzer0 admins could play whack-a-mole with the right-wingers attracted to that instance, and your users could play it too... but come on, too much effort. Specially because I expect your users to gravitate heavily towards anarchism, so this sort of "democracy doesn't work!" muppet will likely rub them off the wrong way.

Also, didn't dbzer0 ban Twitter links? I remember you guys were voting on something like this. If you did, then defederating thelemmy.club is even more sensible, as it's consistent with previous decisions.

(Just my two cents. I'm not from this instance, I don't even know if I can vote [I probably can't].)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Voting against defederation. I’d prefer we have a clear protocol of escalation: let people block those communities, if it gets egregious and we start seeing hex style brigading or continuous support for bans, consider an instance wide community ban, then go for full defederation

Haven't seen enough of it on main to warrant hair-trigger actions IMO

“Keep a weather eye and steady as she goes”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

never heard of the instance before, never seen any of their content or posting. If it's problematic by all means, defederate them, but then i would also think the instance admin would ban them as well.

Otherwise maybe we should watch with apprehension until something happens?

The nazi bar problem is a real problem, but so much as the nazi bar problem is real, there is also the anti-nazi bar. The bar that invents and creates nazis, just to kick them out of the bar, to ensure there are no nazis. It's not really an easy problem to solve.

i'd be more concerned if they were doing the hexbear thing where they started infiltrating other instances and causing problems there. Personally, don't really care if they exist in a vacuum though. Assuming they don't cause any problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think this is a Nazi bar problem just yet. I have not really seen any heinous comment on Lemmy so far and I spend too much time on here. We can always defederate later if this instance gets out of hand.

Voting against defederation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If I understand federation in lemmy correctly, we wouldn't see comments and posts from the users from lemmy.club in communities on other instances too, right?

I'm absolutely in favour of doing something about it, but defederation as a first step seems to be a bit too much, even if it is temporary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Having not actually run into any of the mentioned nazi content myself, I don't feel personally invested in defederation.

I personally prefer for the nazis to be clustered together in one corner so that it's easy to mute or block them without their knowledge, and I do have some apprehension against defederating this early and causing them to scatter into wind on other instances.

If any of those comms they're moderating actually have nazi content, it should be an easy decision to cut them lose since we have a vested interest in keeping that shit off our servers, but if the fear is simply that the right-lean of the comms may create a place for nazis to gather then I might be on the side of waiting for signs of infection before amputation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›