Gay sex is limitless compared to straight sex because they don’t stack infinitely.
196
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.
You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain 'straight' by the condition 'sufficiently kinky'.
OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?
I'm mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.
If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men's butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed...
The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.
A 'constraint' is very loosely in set theory / math terms ... basically a way of saying... these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we 'constrain' some of the factors.
So I am 'constraining' the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.
Unironically, that doesn't involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.
EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling
Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?
I'm giving you Lemmy gold
Beans please.
We do beans around here, apparently, rofl.
i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.
I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.
Picturing the resonance of the human sexipede is funny to me.
The human sexipede
I wonder what would happen if they made a loop.
Would they be stuck like that?
A risk I’m willing to take
Ah the mythical Ouroboros of Pegging.
for science!
Now this is science I can get behind! Let's get someone behind me!
How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our ~~top~~ switch scientists researching this at once!
Maybe we haven't heard of successful attempts because it's like when ants get stuck in a loop.
It's 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.
I'm the guy and the other guy is the guy whose wife we are DPing
You keep saying that but I told you I don't have a wife. It's just me and you, buddy.
Drugs take you to some crazy places.
What have we been putting our dicks in?!
Good question! I guess I'm the other guy. No way I would be the main character!
That's really rude! What if I'm having sex with a trans woman? That doesn't make her "the other guy", not even if she penetrates me with her gigantic girl cock that dwarfs mine.